On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Ondrej Bilka nel...@seznam.cz wrote:
My point is that you could just Object have methods true,false and nil
Any reasonably optimalizing compiler would replace them with bytecode.
As methods, you could override them. And since you don't know which
subclasses
Hi Chris... I finally had some time to address the points you made in
you reply.
Chris Warburton chriswa...@googlemail.com writes:
If I understand correctly then there's the potential for ambiguities
to arise if we differentiate WRT 2 different objects, and we're
calling the same method on
Jecel, thanks for your reply. Inline.
On Jun 11, 2011, at 4:38 PM, Jecel Assumpcao Jr. je...@merlintec.com wrote:
Casey,
Here's a fun thought: while staring at the Visual6502 visualization, it
occurred to
me that the likes of Verilog and VHDL probably represent a rather tall order
to
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 1:40 AM, BGB cr88...@gmail.com wrote:
The responsiveness of exploratory programming environments (such as the
Smalltalk programming environment) allows the programmer to concentrate on
the task at hand rather than being distracted by long pauses caused by
compilation or
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:05 AM, David Barbour dmbarb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Ondrej Bilka nel...@seznam.cz wrote:
My point is that you could just Object have methods true,false and nil
Any reasonably optimalizing compiler would replace them with bytecode.
As
On 6/11/2011 6:30 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 1:40 AM, BGBcr88...@gmail.com wrote:
The responsiveness of exploratory programming environments (such as the
Smalltalk programming environment) allows the programmer to concentrate on
the task at hand rather than being
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:19 PM, David Barbour dmbarb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:33 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote:
the majority of papers in academic compiler conferences (say, PLDI)
suddenly shifted away from purely static compilation.
True, if you use a
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:34 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote:
Even if you're doing pure static analysis, you should be doing
open/closed class analysis and specializing/inlining any class which
has no subclasses in the compilation.
Doesn't work with pluggable components.
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 12:13 AM, David Barbour dmbarb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:34 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote:
Even if you're doing pure static analysis, you should be doing
open/closed class analysis and specializing/inlining any class which
has no
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:36 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote:
This is discussed in the paper(s). Closed/open types can be
considered part of the type system, in which case they are perfectly
compatible with plugins.
If you make it an explicit part of the type system, I could
10 matches
Mail list logo
