Re: [Fonts]Re: Adobe Glyph Names - Unicode 3.2 (was: Xft and MathML)

2002-06-10 Thread Berthold K.P. Horn
At 03:54 PM 6/5/2002 -0400, James H. Cloos Jr. wrote: Markus == Markus Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Markus It might be very worthwile to start updating the PostScript Markus glyph names in the various TeX Type1 fonts to match current Markus standards, as soon as Adobe has updated Markus

Re: [Fonts]Re: Adobe Glyph Names - Unicode 3.2 (was: Xft and MathML)

2002-06-04 Thread Keith Packard
Around 21 o'clock on Jun 4, Markus Kuhn wrote: and (from what I heared) about to revise the entire thing to add the Unicode 3.2 mappings for many of the glyphs that were so far mapped into the Adobe Corporate Use Area. In case he has already a draft of that, it might save both you and the

Re: [Fonts]Re: Adobe Glyph Names - Unicode 3.2 (was: Xft and MathML)

2002-06-04 Thread James H. Cloos Jr.
Keith == Keith Packard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Keith I'm more interested in discovering whether the existing fonts Keith used for MathML include these [adobe recomended] glyph names so Probably not. The (postscript versions of the) interesting math fonts I beleive all predate adobe's glyph

Re: [Fonts]Re: Adobe Glyph Names - Unicode 3.2 (was: Xft and MathML)

2002-06-04 Thread Keith Packard
Around 20 o'clock on Jun 4, James H. Cloos Jr. wrote: Probably not. The (postscript versions of the) interesting math fonts I beleive all predate adobe's glyph naming recomendations. (At least for the TeX-related ones; I cannot speak definitively on mozilla's other set of recomended math