On 17.08.2005 17:08:12 Manuel Mall wrote:
Just did my first FOP WIKI update. I added instructions for NetBeans to
http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/FOPIDESetupGuide.
Hope that's OK. Please yell if I shouldn't do this or should do it
differently.
Rest assured that we WOULD yell if we
I don't do native JDK 1.5 development (i.e. no generics etc.) but
regularly compile and test with 1.5 and so far absolutely no problems.
On 17.08.2005 19:31:14 Peter B. West wrote:
How's Eclipse with 1.5 nowadays?
Jeremias Maerki
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I don't do native JDK 1.5 development (i.e. no generics etc.) but
regularly compile and test with 1.5 and so far absolutely no problems.
On 17.08.2005 19:31:14 Peter B. West wrote:
How's Eclipse with 1.5 nowadays?
Thanks. When I tried it ( a while ago now) it was the
I can't talk for Luca, but I don't think we have explicit design docs
for that part. I think there is some useful content in the mail archives
(search for Knuth). Other than that, I realized that the algorithm
described in Knuth's Digital Typography is now in our codebase quite
literally (although
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36238.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I have yet to look at this more closely, but I have the impression that
it would not be the right approach to do URI resolution in the ParsedURL
area, but it should actually occur beforehand. As the name suggests
ParsedURL's job is to parse and provide access to a URL. A URI is a more
general
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I can't talk for Luca, but I don't think we have explicit design docs
for that part. I think there is some useful content in the mail archives
(search for Knuth). Other than that, I realized that the algorithm
described in Knuth's Digital Typography is now in our codebase
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35940.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35940.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36238.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15119.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I have just documented the rules with respect to determining the base
value for percentage calculations on the WIKI [1]. I also looked at the
fop-dev messages related to the code in this area ([2] and [3]).
If my analysis in [1] is correct we have broadly speaking 4 different
cases to
Peter B. West wrote:
Is there any design documentation about plain old line Knuth breaking,
as implemented by Luca? I see lots of stuff in the Wiki about page
breaking, but can't see the original.
As Jeremias told, there isn't much official documentation about the
basics of the new breaking
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36248.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
14 matches
Mail list logo
