Peter B. West wrote:
Finn Bock wrote:
[Peter B. West]
The alt-design property code was, back then, in my eyes, code written
by a person who did not intuitively create object oriented design.
...
It was, IMO, not a good fundation for further work.
Fair enough, apart from the
I just committed a fairly sizeable patch related to all the work on
inline objects done over the last weeks.
While I hope it hasn't broken anything, given its size and my
inexperience with the overall FOP software base, it is actually likely
that there are some unexpected regressions.
Please
Manuel Mall schrieb:
I just committed a fairly sizeable patch related to all the work on
inline objects done over the last weeks.
Great that you are finally able to commit .. welcome!
While I hope it hasn't broken anything, given its size and my
inexperience with the overall FOP software
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005 08:00 pm, Christian Geisert wrote:
Manuel Mall schrieb:
I just committed a fairly sizeable patch related to all the work on
inline objects done over the last weeks.
Great that you are finally able to commit .. welcome!
While I hope it hasn't broken anything, given its
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005 08:51 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Great work That's a lot of new functionality. And lots of new
test cases! You're a prime role model. :-)
I've got a comment and a question:
- I assume the change in StaticPropertyList was a mistake:
Jeremias has sent a most magnanimous email to me. It reflects as well
on him as my imputations as to his motives reflect badly on me.
My apologies to Jeremias.
Peter
--
Peter B. West http://cv.pbw.id.au/
Folio http://defoe.sourceforge.net/folio/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic
Luca,
I would appreciate if you could please have a look at test case
inline_border_padding_block_nested.xml. If you run the test case as
is you get a Expect inline sequence as first sequence when last
paragraph is not null message. If you comment everything out and
uncomment the last block
Manuel,
Congratulations on your new committership. And a hearty Welcome!
Regards,
Web Maestro Clay
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://homepage.mac.com/webmaestro/
My religion is simple. My religion is kindness.
- HH The 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet
Peter,
On Oct 7, 2005, at 6:26 AM, Peter B. West wrote:
Jeremias has sent a most magnanimous email to me. It reflects as well
on him as my imputations as to his motives reflect badly on me.
My apologies to Jeremias.
Peter
Thank you for this. As I believe is true of the nature of the
Manuel Mall
I would appreciate if you could please have a look at test case
inline_border_padding_block_nested.xml. If you run the test case as
is you get a Expect inline sequence as first sequence when last
paragraph is not null message. If you comment everything out and
uncomment the last
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Supporting wrap-option=no-wrap on fo:inline will take some
additional work in FOP Trunk. It works fine in 0.20.5.
That's no surprise given that in the maintenance branch fo:inline
doesn't create an area and is basically the same as fo:wrapper.
I still wonder:
Manuel Mall wrote:
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 04:17 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 05.10.2005 09:46:18 Manuel Mall wrote:
While I am at it (this whole alignment stuff I mean) we may as well
do it properly. This would include support for the script
property. The allowed values for script are defined
12 matches
Mail list logo
