[Manuel]
Agree, and I have a solution for that ready to go.
I think this deserves some further comment / discussion. One, IMO
important, reason I want to do the evaluation during the FO parsing
stage is that once we are in the LMs we lost the property inheritance
information. That is
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 04:05 pm, Finn Bock wrote:
[Manuel]
Agree, and I have a solution for that ready to go.
I think this deserves some further comment / discussion. One, IMO
important, reason I want to do the evaluation during the FO parsing
stage is that once we are in the LMs we lost
Manuel Mall wrote:
PS: I can imagine Victor smiling now :-) : I told you so that not
leaving all property resolution to the LM stage is going to cause
trouble.
Not just Victor, Manuel. But please press on re-discovering the wheel.
Peter
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
Manuel Mall wrote:
PS: I can imagine Victor smiling now :-) : I told you so
that not leaving all property resolution to the LM stage is
going to cause trouble.
Trust me, I'm not smiling. As one of our U.S. Presidents was known for
saying, I feel your pain. In fact, it might be fairly said
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 08:43 pm, Victor Mote wrote:
Manuel Mall wrote:
PS: I can imagine Victor smiling now :-) : I told you so
that not leaving all property resolution to the LM stage is
going to cause trouble.
Trust me, I'm not smiling. As one of our U.S. Presidents was known
for saying,
Manuel Mall wrote:
Fair enough, btw its not painful for me at all. I have joined the
project with the goal to help to get FOP 1.0 out of the door in a
relatively short timeframe (meaning months not years). To achieve that
I am more than prepared to be pragmatic in the sense of getting things
Chris Bowditch wrote:
This is an excellent goal. Sometimes it is all too easy to
aim for 100% perfection and then FOP gets stuck - just like
it has been for 2 years prior to 2005. Compromise is the key
to getting 1.0 out of the door.
This is grossly foul. I don't remember anyone striving
Victor Mote wrote:
Chris Bowditch wrote:
This is an excellent goal. Sometimes it is all too easy to
aim for 100% perfection and then FOP gets stuck - just like
it has been for 2 years prior to 2005. Compromise is the key
to getting 1.0 out of the door.
This is grossly foul. I don't
Chris Bowditch wrote:
Manuel Mall wrote:
Fair enough, btw its not painful for me at all. I have joined the
project with the goal to help to get FOP 1.0 out of the door in a
relatively short timeframe (meaning months not years). To achieve that
I am more than prepared to be pragmatic in the
Peter B. West wrote:
snip/
Couldn't let that one go by, Chris. These issues, which were critical
to the creation of both Folio and FOray, were being thrashed out around
the beginning of 2003. You've been around long enough to know that,
haven't you? So for more than two years, the pragmatic
Chris Bowditch wrote:
Peter B. West wrote:
snip/
Couldn't let that one go by, Chris. These issues, which were critical
to the creation of both Folio and FOray, were being thrashed out around
the beginning of 2003. You've been around long enough to know that,
haven't you? So for more than
[Jeremias Maerki on ]
Yeah: Wow! Finn, you're the specialist here. Can you take the lead on
this one?
I'm hardly a specialist on the layout system, and that is where a good
sized part of Manuels patch is, but in the property system I do not like
the hack to LineHeightPropertyMaker and
Finn,
thanks a lot for looking at this.
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 03:19 am, Finn Bock wrote:
[Jeremias Maerki on ]
Yeah: Wow! Finn, you're the specialist here. Can you take the lead
on this one?
I'm hardly a specialist on the layout system, and that is where a
good sized part of Manuels patch
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 08:27 am, Manuel Mall wrote:
Finn,
thanks a lot for looking at this.
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 03:19 am, Finn Bock wrote:
[Jeremias Maerki on ]
snip/
I'm hardly a specialist on the layout system, and that is where a
good sized part of Manuels patch is, but in the property
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36379.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
15 matches
Mail list logo
