Hello,
As the lack of friendlyness I've always felt with git, before using fossil I
used mercurial.
If I wanted to convert any mercurial repository to fossil, how should do that?
Has anyone done that?
Regards,
Lluís.
___
fossil-users mailing list
Le 2011-07-18 à 09:17, Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hello,
As the lack of friendlyness I've always felt with git, before using fossil I
used mercurial.
If I wanted to convert any mercurial repository to fossil, how should do that?
Has anyone
I have converted a cvs repo to fossil.
I checked if the tag release_v5_1_0 would yield the same number of
files
as you can see from this timeline fragment it is version 186f4fdca4
[186f4fdca4] brokerhost geintroduceert
* Upd mxflex/gbo/app_po.inc: 1.39
* Upd mxflex/gbo/app_bo.inc: 1.36
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Rene renew...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I have converted a cvs repo to fossil.
I checked if the tag release_v5_1_0 would yield the same number of
files
as you can see from this timeline fragment it is version 186f4fdca4
[186f4fdca4] brokerhost geintroduceert
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:38:07 -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Rene wrote:
I have converted a cvs repo to fossil.
I checked if the tag release_v5_1_0 would yield the same number of
files
as you can see from this timeline fragment it is version
186f4fdca4
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Rene renew...@xs4all.nl wrote:
It must be something specific for this repo because if I do a tarball
from my local
copy of fossil (hence the same version) I don't see multiple
directories.
What version of Fossil are you running on the server, and what
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:15:50 -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Rene wrote:
It must be something specific for this repo because if I do a
tarball
from my local
copy of fossil (hence the same version) I don't see multiple
directories.
What version of Fossil are
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:15:50 -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Rene wrote:
It must be something specific for this repo because if I do a
tarball
from my local
copy of fossil (hence the same version) I don't see multiple
directories.
What version of Fossil are
Thomas Schnurrenberger's fossil service command - for running Fossil as a
windows service - is now on the trunk. But I wonder: The name of this
command is very similar to fossil server and might be confusing. Do we
need to change it to something more distinctive? Perhaps fossil wservice
or
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
something more distinctive? Perhaps fossil wservice or fossil
win-serve. Other ideas?
i'd prefer win-service, but i don't use windows so i don't get a vote.
or maybe:
fossil M$ervice
;)
--
- stephan beal
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:15:50 -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Rene wrote:
It must be something specific for this repo because if I do a
tarball
from my local
copy of fossil (hence the same version) I don't see multiple
directories.
What version of Fossil are
Hi,
I've stumbled upon a situation in which fossil's latest wins merge
strategy and a system's far-in-the-future clock have messed up my
content timeline. I do recall fossil's warning regarding out-of-synch
clocks when synching, but thought that it would DTRT since the files
being modified in
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Joan Picanyol i Puig
lists-fos...@biaix.org wrote:
Hi,
I've stumbled upon a situation in which fossil's latest wins merge
strategy and a system's far-in-the-future clock have messed up my
content timeline. I do recall fossil's warning regarding out-of-synch
The old tar 'v7' format only supports file names up to 99 characters,
according to the GNU tar documentation.
The check in 'tar_add_header' (tar.c) checks for nName 100.
The file name that gets mangled is exactly 100 chars long
Gé
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Rene wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Joan Picanyol i Puig wrote:
I've stumbled upon a situation in which fossil's latest wins merge
strategy and a system's far-in-the-future clock have messed up my
If the second paragraph does
I'd say service is good. win-service may be appropriate since this command is
valid only on Windows. However, I'd like to avoid use of hyphen (-) in commands.
I hope this command is automatically disabled (via compiler or run-time) for
non-windows platforms.
- Original Message -
I currently host fossil server as a window service via NSSM. fossil
service gets my vote. simple to the point.
Other platforms could either re-direct it (e.g., fossil service becomes an
alias for fossil server), or just print a message saying that the command
is only valid for Windows operating
Out of curiosity, why are you converting from mercurial?
I ask because my friends and I adopted fossil and other friends of ours are
asking us why we didn't go with mercurial instead. I didn't really have a
good answer, apart from fossil seemed smaller (footprint, use-complexity)
and cooler =)
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:18:29 -0700
Jeremy Anderson jere...@gmail.com wrote:
Out of curiosity, why are you converting from mercurial?
While you weren't asking me, I converted from mercurial (and did the
hg - git - fossil path) to fossil, so feel an answer from me isn't
unreasonable.
I ask
19 matches
Mail list logo
