On 17-12-2012 8:33, Baruch Burstein wrote:
Another suggestion:
Since visual diffs are always for text files (I think), it doesn't make
much sense to mark partial words as changed. If the whole word is not
unchanged, then the whole word is changed. I am referring to things like
line 73817 on the
Hello,
adding a tag, in the edit checking page, it takes 15s of server cpu time (a
reasonably fast Atom x86_64) for our repository.
Repository statistics:
Repository Size:274292736 bytes (274.3MB)
Number Of Artifacts:31867 (stored as 12262 full text and 19605 delta blobs)
Uncompressed
Maybe joining both ideas? Like coloring the whole word of a more neutral
color and the difference with the usual bright color?
I think it would be the best as I agree with both point of views.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Martijn Coppoolse
li...@martijn.coppoolse.com wrote:
On 17-12-2012
On 2012-12-16 08:37, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
As with the
stand-alone wiki pages, I would only index the last version of
each matching file in each branch. When a file is changed by a new
check-in or push, remove the old version and index the new one.
Finally, how should
I use debian wheezy. If I try to add a unix hidden file to my repo with
'fossil add --dotfiles .file' I get the same warning as if I would not use
the --dotfile option and could not add the file.
I also compiled the latest fossil and tested again, getting the same result.
Why --dotfiles option
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.namewrote:
Hello,
adding a tag, in the edit checking page, it takes 15s of server cpu time (a
reasonably fast Atom x86_64) for our repository.
Repository statistics:
Repository Size:274292736 bytes (274.3MB)
Number Of
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 08:28:22AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell
vi...@viric.namewrote:
Hello,
adding a tag, in the edit checking page, it takes 15s of server cpu time (a
reasonably fast Atom x86_64) for our repository.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Marius Stoica mariusto...@gmail.comwrote:
I use debian wheezy. If I try to add a unix hidden file to my repo with
'fossil add --dotfiles .file' I get the same warning as if I would not use
the --dotfile option and could not add the file.
I also compiled the
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:56 PM, K k...@lightpowered.org wrote:
Hello,
I've done a number of fossil mv file.h source/code/ today, then issued a
commit. The check-in reports that all of the files I've moved have been
deleted and renamed.
For example:
Deleted foo.c version
Indeed it works. The problem was me :D. I tried to include a dotfile using
full path, something like: 'fossil add --dotfiles /home/user/.file' or
'fossil add --dotfiles /home/user/'.
Thanks for clearing it out
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec
On 17-12-2012 10:27, Paolo Bolzoni wrote:
Maybe joining both ideas? Like coloring the whole word of a more neutral
color and the difference with the usual bright color?
I think it would be the best as I agree with both point of views.
That would work for me. :-)
--
Martijn Coppoolse
I am experiencing the same problem when inspecting the user's changes via the
command line. fossil timeline rev -n 1 -t ci -showfiles describes renamed
files as DELETED. I would like to see the newly named file as ADDED or the
original file described as renamed and tell me the new name.
on Dec 17, 2012, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:56 PM, K k...@lightpowered.org wrote:
Hello,
I've done a number of fossil mv file.h source/code/ today, then issued a
commit.
The check-in reports that all of the files I've moved have been deleted and
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:55 PM, K k...@lightpowered.org wrote:
I'm looking at the page for my file and its history ends as deleted when I
did not delete it. I moved it, which fossil changes reported as a RENAMED.
I commited and now have the surprise dumped on me that my file was deleted
and
As I said, I did not DELETE any files, but rather moved them. fossil changes
reported them as RENAMED. And in the check in, they are being reported as
DELETED.
I'm just asking how in the design of Fossil you justified this decision. Please
directly address this vs skirting it.
^K
on Dec
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 3:49 PM, K k...@lightpowered.org wrote:
As I said, I did not DELETE any files, but rather moved them. fossil
changes reported them as RENAMED. And in the check in, they are being
reported as DELETED.
I'm just asking how in the design of Fossil you justified this
I don't need to make assumptions, and therefore am not. I'm going off of the
facts, which I can observe, and which I can present to others.
The file was not deleted. It was moved using Fossil's own fossil mv command.
It's irrational to treat this as a deletion.
If you cannot provide
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:58 PM, K k...@lightpowered.org wrote:
If you cannot provide justification for this behavior snip
I'm a bit confused by the tone of some of the messages on the list lately.
This could have as easily been worded as a polite bug report, but
instead comes across as
When some arbitrary decision/value such as a minimum length of wiki pages
imposes itself for no rational reason on my workflow, and I'm told by the
maintainer to maintain a separate personal branch rather than this being
changed in the main source, I started leaving my Richard Hipp fan club
Hi!
I have a few related ideas/feature requests.
1- Fossil Ohloh.net
http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/tktview?name=0f36ec7790
The best is to have Ohloh.net support Fossil. But, a sync would at
least permit activity stats visibility on Fossil-managed projects with
a Git read-only mirror.
2-
I've been asked to clarify the confusion behavior I've run into.
$ fossil open project.fossil
project files expand into current directory as expected
$ mkdir source
$ mkdir source/code
$ fossil mv file.h source/code/
RENAME file.h source/code/file.h
$ fossil changes
MISSINGsource/code/file.h
Hi!
1- Here is a bump on my November 30th message below
2- Some additional info about WikiMatrix.org
One of the three suggestions is no longer there so I'll repeat it here.
WikiMatrix.org is the place for people to compare and pick a wiki engine.
Very few wiki engines are distributed wikis and
I believe I may have found a bug in the behavior of the timeline. As
this may be just me, I figured I'd check with the community to see if
anyone else is seeing this behavior (described below).
Steps to reproduce:
1. Go to http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline
2. Click Older
3. Click Newer
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:48 PM, K k...@lightpowered.org wrote:
I've been asked to clarify the confusion behavior I've run into.
$ fossil open project.fossil
project files expand into current directory as expected
$ mkdir source
$ mkdir source/code
$ fossil mv file.h source/code/
RENAME
Same thing here...
--
Martin
Le 2012-12-17 à 20:34, David J. Weller-Fahy
dave-lists-fossil-us...@weller-fahy.com a écrit :
I believe I may have found a bug in the behavior of the timeline. As
this may be just me, I figured I'd check with the community to see if
anyone else is seeing this
on Dec 17, 2012, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:48 PM, K k...@lightpowered.org wrote:
I've been asked to clarify the confusion behavior I've run into.
$ fossil open project.fossil
project files expand into current directory as expected
$ mkdir source
$
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:00 PM, K k...@lightpowered.org wrote:
#2 is fixed, no longer showing moved files as deleted in the check-in
overview. Thank you. #1 is not fixed.
Alternative fix is here: http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/info/aa9a2485de
You'll need to run fossil rebuild again
You know, for someone using a tool that hasn't paid for it, you have a real
tone of overweening entitlement. Perhaps you need to look up the
definitions involved in free software and open source software. You
may wish, in particular, to pay attention to the portions of it that
involve how to get
on Dec 17, 2012, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:00 PM, K k...@lightpowered.org wrote:
#2 is fixed, no longer showing moved files as deleted in the check-in
overview. Thank
you. #1 is not fixed.
Alternative fix is here:
Thanks for sharing!
^K
on Dec 17, 2012, Michael Richter ttmrich...@gmail.com wrote:
You know, for someone using a tool that hasn't paid for it, you have a real
tone of
overweening entitlement. Perhaps you need to look up the definitions involved
in
free software and open source software.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:12 PM, K k...@lightpowered.org wrote:
However, I'm still curious why files must split upon move?
It isn't a requirement. The page is simply showing all artifacts that
represent a file with a given name. That is one way to slice the data.
You are wanting to track a
on Dec 17, 2012, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:12 PM, K k...@lightpowered.org wrote:
However, I'm still curious why files must split upon move?
It isn't a requirement. The page is simply showing all artifacts that
represent a
file with a given name.
* Martin Gagnon eme...@gmail.com [2012-12-17 20:59 -0500]:
Le 2012-12-17 à 20:34, David J. Weller-Fahy
dave-lists-fossil-us...@weller-fahy.com a écrit :
1. Go to http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline
2. Click Older
3. Click Newer
4. Click 200 Entries
Note, the number of entries
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 05:13:24PM -0800, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
Chad Perrin wrote:
zsh: sports metaphor not found
Sorry, I was attempting to inject some humor into this discussion because
it has grown very tedious.
I guess you didn't find my rejoinder amusing.
HDDs also
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 05:02:23PM -0800, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
Chad Perrin wrote:
If you use bleeding edge versions, you should already be prepared to deal
with changes in behavior. I don't see the problem.
I help write the bleeding edge versions. Therefore, it is useful that I
Do you two need a room? If so, there's a local so-called love hotel I
can book for you in two-hour slots.
On 18 December 2012 13:00, Chad Perrin c...@apotheon.net wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 05:02:23PM -0800, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
Chad Perrin wrote:
If you use bleeding edge
36 matches
Mail list logo
