Re: [fossil-users] Why Hash

2015-09-09 22:03 GMT+01:00 paul : > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Luca Ferrari > wrote: > >> Assuming I am remembering correctly, if Fossil had this feature, you >>> could >>> do something like: >>> >>> $ fossil timeline -N -n 3 >>> 0

Re: [fossil-users] Conflicts during update

Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com: On Aug 12, 2015, at 2:13 AM, Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com wrote: I work primarily on Windows and whenever fossil complains about CR/LF I just ignore it (saying 'a' during the commit). Don’t do that. Fossil is trying to tell you about a real problem

Re: [fossil-users] Conflicts during update

to list files that were reported as conflicting during merge, is there? Cheers, Jacek 2015-08-12 8:21 GMT+01:00 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com: On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I've done fossil update and got a suspicious message about merge

Re: [fossil-users] Conflicts during update

Hi Tomek, As mentioned in my previous e-mail, in my case it was an issue with files changed in my working copy which were deleted in the remote repo. Fossil reported them as 'edited locally but deleted by update' and left them in my working copy. I find it inconvenient because the only way I can

Re: [fossil-users] quick poll: do you generally use add/rm or mv

The same for me. I always use mv as, I guess, add/remove destroys the history of changes. Re syncing with the file system, I find it ok as it is. Usually, I move files using IDE when coding, and then find missing ones while trying to commit. For me 'mv' works ok with the exception that when I

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with cloning a repo

As stated in the original question 'ssh SERVERNAME' works fine, which means 'ping SERVERNAME' can also resolve the name ok. 2015-06-17 13:44 GMT+01:00 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com: On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com wrote: works perfectly fine. It's

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with cloning a repo

. Best, Jacek 2015-06-17 14:20 GMT+01:00 Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com: 2015-06-16 17:44 GMT+02:00 Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com: Hi, I'm running fossil 1.33 in a docker container and found an issue when cloning my repo. If I run it like: $ fossil clone http://USERNAME

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with cloning a repo

Thank you Jan for clarifying the problem. BTW, perhaps that's a reason why on the download page there could also be a linux-x64 version available. Cheers, Jacek 2015-06-17 15:17 GMT+01:00 Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com: 2015-06-17 15:56 GMT+02:00 Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com

[fossil-users] Issue with cloning a repo

Hi, I'm running fossil 1.33 in a docker container and found an issue when cloning my repo. If I run it like: $ fossil clone http://USERNAME@SERVERNAME/REPONAME repo.fossil it fails reporting: getaddrinfo() fails: Name or service not known Clone done, sent: 0 received: 0 ip: server returned

[fossil-users] Stable sort on ticket reports

Hi all, The current sorting algorithm on the ticket report pages is unstable, which makes it difficult to sort the report by more than one column. Looking into the code I found relatively easy fix that would turn the sorting functions into stable one: for sortText and sortKey the change is just:

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket submission time in a ticket report

My bad... I meant 'View Ticket Page' as in 'Admin-Tickets-View Ticket Page'. I guess, I cannot call sql directly from TH1, can I? Cheers, Jacek 2015-01-20 21:55 GMT+00:00 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com: On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com wrote

[fossil-users] Ticket submission time in a ticket report

Hi all, Is there an easy way to show ticket's submission time? I see tkt_datetime which is a special TH1 variable that refers to tkt_mtime field from the table. In the table there's 'tkt_ctime' but including that in a report shows a double value which is of little use for the end users.

Re: [fossil-users] Ordering ticket priority/severity

Hi, Below is one of my ticket report pages. I'm not entirely sure it's the best approach but works fine for me. What it does is two selects. The inner select classifies status, priority, severity and difficulty so then I can order them appropriately. The outer select presents the data in human

Re: [fossil-users] Cloning repo

Stephan, Andy, Thanks for the quick action re my issue. I'll test it as soon as I have a little more time (end of this week?). Best, Jacek 2014-10-06 16:23 GMT+01:00 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com: On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: After

[fossil-users] Cloning repo

Hi all, I've noticed an unexecpected behaviour in fossil when doing a clone. The issue appears when you try clone with a wrong user name and as the result an empty repo is created. I'd rather expect an error on the console and nothing else. The thing is fully reproducible with the latest windows

Re: [fossil-users] ticket that depends on another ticket

Hi Paolo, Below are things which I use, based on various answers from the mailing list. Have a look at these excerpts and put them in the appropriate places via Admin/Tickets/Edit or View Basically, I changed the edit and view ticket pages to add/show blockers. As said above, it's just for

Re: [fossil-users] ticket that depends on another ticket

Sorry, forgot to add that for the code to work you need also to add field: blockers TEXT, to the ticket table (Admin/Tickets/Common). Cheers, Jacek 2014-10-01 6:26 GMT+01:00 Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com: Hi Paolo, Below are things which I use, based on various answers from the mailing

Re: [fossil-users] feature request: tracking/diffing files across renames

+1 for this. I stumbled upon that a few times and would really like to see it's there. Cheers, Jacek 2013/11/30 j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com regarding this thread http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm. org/msg12774.html and this more recent one

[fossil-users] Ticket system -- blockers

Hi all, About 4 years ago I wrote about a missing feature -- a way to specify that a ticket is a blocker of another ticket. There was a useful suggestion from Brian T... time passed and recently this feature has become more and more urgent to me, so I decided to implement it. For those

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket system -- blockers

in the field (possibly without commas, or a mixture). Ignoring the complication of having to parse/grok the content (it's a minor complication, granted, but parsing text is always at least a slight annoyance), there's another problem: DVCS. i edit the field, then you close the ticket in your

Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

Hi All, One more feature that I also miss in the current version is selective commit. I mean something which allows you to see changes as a numbered list and then commit selectively e.g. issuing 'fossil commit -range 1-10,15'. It requires that 'fossil changes' is invoked before commit but that's

Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

Hi all, My 2 cents below regarding ticket numbering: 2013/7/22 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com * built-in persistent integer ticket numbers in addition to the SHA1 ticket/artifact ID. The SHA1 hexdigest fragments are too geeky for management during the weekly status meeting. Stable

Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

2013/7/22 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com wrote: - project create initializes internal repo ticket number with '1', - project clone adds suffix '.1' to the repo ticket number, That would require that cloning change

Re: [fossil-users] Fwd: Fossil design error and possible ways to fix it

Personally, I don't mind if you go for option (1). From the fossil timeline you mentioned ( http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?c=2012-11-21+16%3A28%3A03) it seems that it's not a big issue at all. I believe that all relevant comments can be easily edited by hand for all those who really

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about using tag

2012/11/23 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org fossil commit -f --tag release --tag version-3.7.15 --bgcolor #d0c0ff' This hint (and others you mentioned later in your e-mail) is really useful to know. IMHO it is much more important to update documentation with such {clever hints/best practices}

Re: [fossil-users] comparison with Git

Hi all, My two cents: I like phrase *commit jungle* and sometimes would like to revert some commits or re-commit things a bit different. I also suppose that it is not that rare when people commit something by mistake or something which has not been tested enough. On the other hand my gut feeling

Re: [fossil-users] comparison with Git

2012/9/14 Bill Burdick bill.burd...@gmail.com: Sure, you could have named, alternate timelines and just choose which one to make the default, each timeline forming a namespace for its branches and tags and timelines could inherit from other timelines. That way you could have rabasing without

Re: [fossil-users] comparison with Git

2012/9/14 Bill Burdick bill.burd...@gmail.com: Private commit tags sound a little less versatile than Git rebasing. As said above, I don't really know how git rebasing works. Could you shed more light on why it is more versatile than the simple private tags? Cheers, Jacek

Re: [fossil-users] comparison with Git

Thanks Bill for the explanation. I see private tags as the end result of 'squash' rather than 'edit'. If you have three commits A-B-C and decide to hide B, you will see A-C. And then diff between C-A will show combined commits B+C against A. Regarding 'edit' and 'reorder', while 'edit' could be

Re: [fossil-users] comparison with Git

2012/9/14 Michal Suchanek hramr...@gmail.com: so you do a rebase so that your commits can be applied on top of F and send then for review: A-B-C-D-E-F-X'-Y'-Z' If there are no conflicts between your changes and upstream this is fine, otherwise you have to resolve them somehow, and upstream

Re: [fossil-users] A counter in the ticket name

AM, Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com wrote: Right. I tend to forget about the distributed aspect of fossil as I mostly work with the centralized setup. On the other hand, you could give each instance its own prefix, then all the ticket numbers would be unique. You'd still need a centralized

Re: [fossil-users] cannot commit 'manifest file (1816) is malformed'

: On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for the prompt action. Please keep me/the list informed about the patch. Please try the latest trunk version of Fossil. I believe it has fixed your issue and should be working for you now. Maybe

[fossil-users] Turning off change tracking for certain files

Hi All, I've got in my repo a small number of files that are changing but these changes are not meant to be send to the repo (are kind of user-specific). The files are needed in the repo but only in their initial or some specific version. Is there any way to turn off change tracking for some

Re: [fossil-users] Turning off change tracking for certain files

://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal On Jul 2, 2012 11:24 AM, Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I've got in my repo a small number of files that are changing but these changes are not meant to be send to the repo (are kind of user-specific). The files are needed in the repo

Re: [fossil-users] Turning off change tracking for certain files

This is exactly how I would expect it to work. And I like the '--all' option, too. The only thing is if anything better than a list like 'ignore-glob' can be proposed. In my case it's just a few files, so such a list would be enough. However, I can imagine that someone has a large repo and needs

Re: [fossil-users] Turning off change tracking for certain files

2012/7/2 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com: On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com wrote: would be enough. However, I can imagine that someone has a large repo and needs to set no-autocommit to more than 10 files. Then maintaining an 'ignore-glob'-like list may

Re: [fossil-users] Turning off change tracking for certain files

One more thought. Perhaps, there's no need for a separate ignore list but just a bit different semantics of the existing 'ignore-glob'. Couldn't it just be that when a file (a set of files '*.whatever') is in the ignore-glob it behaves exactly like Richard suggested. From a user perspective that

Re: [fossil-users] Turning off change tracking for certain files

2012/7/2 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com: On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com wrote: Couldn't it just be that when a file (a set of files '*.whatever') is in the ignore-glob it behaves exactly like Richard suggested. From a user perspective that would be simpler

Re: [fossil-users] Turning off change tracking for certain files

If it happens I have some spare time, I'll look on the {is/if}_selected and will report on any progress. Cheers, Jacek 2012/7/2 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com: On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any difference except from being in the repo

[fossil-users] cannot commit 'manifest file (1816) is malformed'

Hi, I've been doing some code maintenance (lots of deletes, renames, adds) and now cannot do commit. Every commit attempt causes: fossil.exe: manifest file (1816) is malformed. What does this mean? Is there any chance to fix the repo? My fossil version is 1.22. Jacek

Re: [fossil-users] cannot commit 'manifest file (1816) is malformed'

sgb...@googlemail.com: On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com wrote: fossil.exe: manifest file (1816) is malformed. What does this mean? Is there any chance to fix the repo? My fossil version is 1.22. That's a new one. :/ Can you please try: fossil test-agg

Re: [fossil-users] cannot commit 'manifest file (1816) is malformed'

2012/6/29 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: It means there is a bug in Fossil.  ... Note that the changes to the repository happen inside a transaction.  ... ... This is one of the big advantages of using a transactional database engine as the repository, rather than a pile-of-files as in other

Re: [fossil-users] cannot commit 'manifest file (1816) is malformed'

-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg08936.html Best regards, Jacek 2012/6/29 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com wrote:  Hi, I've been doing some code maintenance (lots of deletes, renames, adds) and now cannot do

Re: [fossil-users] cannot commit 'manifest file (1816) is malformed'

Yes, the commit went fine. Thank you again! Jacek 2012/6/29 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for the prompt action. Please keep me/the list informed about the patch. Please try the latest trunk version

[fossil-users] mv after add breaks

Hi All, I moved a file (say file1.txt) from one dir to another and, in the same time, changed its name (say, to dir1\file2.txt); it was relatively long so I forgot about the move. Then I tapped (all names changed for clarity): fossil extra dir1/file2.txt fossil add dir1 ADDED dir1/file2.txt

[fossil-users] A counter in the ticket name

Hi All, I thought about implementing a counter to help with ticket identification for users (IMO, UUIDs are a bit obscure and have no order). My idea was to include an integer value into some table in the repo, read it with TH1 before creation of a new ticket, and increment and store it in the

Re: [fossil-users] A counter in the ticket name

Right. I tend to forget about the distributed aspect of fossil as I mostly work with the centralized setup. Thanks for quick answer before I started :-) ! Cheers, Jacek 2012/6/15 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com: On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Windows

2012/6/13 Rene renew...@xs4all.nl: On 2012-06-12 00:36, Mike Meyer wrote: My boss just sent me mail that said, and I quote:   Fossil sucks and is actually not compatible with Windows Mike, ... Better sit down with him and ask him what the problem is, maybe first a few pints of strong

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Windows

/2012 18:04 7,168 _FOSSIL_ 2 File(s) 7,174 bytes 2 Dir(s) 7,288,463,360 bytes free 2012/6/12 Mike Meyer m...@mired.org: On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:15:08 +0100 Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Could you please be a bit more specific

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Windows

Hi, Could you please be a bit more specific about what errors exactly you have experienced. I've been using fossil on Windows (Vista 32-bit and 7 64-bit) for more than 3 years now and haven't ever experienced any problems with spaces in dirs or file names; Below is an excerpt from the listing of

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. Windows

Hi again, Sorry for not answering your question in my previous post... I'm a bit sleepy (it's about 1am my time). Try double quotes. Just tested with no errors: fossil add new file.txt ADDED new file.txt fossil chan ADDED new file.txt fossil commit -m new file added... New_Version:

Re: [fossil-users] Building portable fossil

Looks like the binary built with --with-openssl=none --static on my fedora works on ubuntu (despite the warnings about static linking against glibc). Thanks all for help. Cheers, Jacek 2012/6/2 Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com: Thank you all for your suggestions! Seems

[fossil-users] Building portable fossil

Hi, I built fossil on Ubuntu with a standard configuration (./configure; make) but when moved and ran the binary on fedora it complained that there's no libssl.so.1.0.0. Indeed, on the fedora is no libssl.so.1.0.0 but libssl.so. When I turned off the ssl support (./configure --with-ssl=none;

Re: [fossil-users] Building portable fossil

Thank you for the hint but it doesn't help. This time I get with my binary: FATAL: kernel too old Segmentation fault while the official one works fine. Jacek 2012/6/2 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com wrote:  Hi, I built

Re: [fossil-users] Example ticket reports

Hi Chen, Below are two which I tend to use for all my own projects. I'm not sure if they are the best SQL ever but work fine for my purposes. All but closed tickets gives you a view sorted by status, priority, severity and submission time. Counters may be used for auditing purposes to show the

[fossil-users] A draft of ranges contribution

Dear Richard, All, Finally, I've found a bit of time to implement the first draft of the ranges functionality I was posting a couple of months ago (http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg07419.html). This is my first contribution to the project so apologize if

Re: [fossil-users] New CSS on the Fossil homepage

Actually, the thing I like most is the rotated skeleton. BTW, have you considered a different logo. For me fossils usually associate with ammonites, like: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Haeckel_Douvilleiceras_mammillatum.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Haeckel_Ammonitida.jpg

[fossil-users] pushing/pulling the configuration of ticket pages

Hi All, I customized ticket pages 'New Ticket Page' and 'Edit Ticket Page' and wanted these changes to be distributed to other users. Unfortunately, doing 'fossil pull -R arepo.fossil' seems not to work. Is there any way to synchronize these and other report pages? Cheers, Jacek

Re: [fossil-users] Behavior of rm, mv, and changes/extra

(n+1): As mentioned in some of my earlier posts (see [1]), I would be great to have an ability to {commit | diff | maybe other file related commands} using ranges like 'fossil commit --range 1,3-4' where numbers correspond to the file order as presented by 'fossil chan'. This is more like feature

[fossil-users] An idea to make command line life easier

Hi all, I've just got an idea about how to improve the use of fossil command line a bit. The main thing is to add an additional index column when running 'fossil changes', so instead of: fossil cha EDITEDsomefile.x EDITEDdir\anotherone.xx EDITEDdir\somefile.x ... it would produce:

Re: [fossil-users] How to limit fossil diff output to just names of the changed files?

Try 'fossil changes' Cheers, Jacek 2012/1/31 Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com: Hi All, I am a new Fossil SCM user and it is my first posting to this mailing list. Please, forgive me if what I am asking has been discussed and answered here before. When I do     sh$ fossil diff --from

Re: [fossil-users] An idea to make command line life easier

need a selective command. More opinions welcome. Cheers, Jacek 2012/1/31 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name: On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 06:45:11PM +, Jacek Cała wrote: How would it be different than:  fossil changes | awk '{ print NR $0; }' or with your filter on lines:  fossil

[fossil-users] Check-Ins Associated With a Ticket

Hi all, I've just noticed that there's link 'Check-ins' in the View Ticket page. Clicking on this I can see page 'Checkins Associated With Ticket xxx' which in my case is empty. Looks like this is somewhat related to a thing I was discussing some time ago

Re: [fossil-users] A little self-promotion

And, most of all, for users it makes documentation just a click away. Cheers, Jacek 2011/11/16 Steve Havelka smh...@gmail.com: On 11/16/11 4:11 PM, Ron Wilson wrote: On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Jacek Całajacek.c...@gmail.com  wrote: and wonder why fossil is by default so humble to

[fossil-users] A little self-promotion

Hi all, Just been preparing a project site based on fossil and wonder why fossil is by default so humble to not include a link to its web site in the footer. Basically, I'd change this: div class=footer Fossil version $release_version $manifest_version $manifest_date /div /body/html to: div

[fossil-users] [best practice] Including external dependencies

Hi all, A best practice question: What is the preferred way to include external libraries in a fossil repository? I mean larger dependencies like boost. For small libs and tools like a few binary or source code files, I tend to include them directly in the repo but for larger ones it doesn't

[fossil-users] Linking to fossil.exe [Re: GUI client for Windows?]

Hi Stephan, All I've just realized that despite fossil is an executable it does not prevent if from exporting functions for other programs to use (at least on Windows, am not sure if this is possible on *nix). I've just made a simple test executable Prog1.exe that links to another executable

Re: [fossil-users] Linking to fossil.exe [Re: GUI client for Windows?]

2011/10/6 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com: 2011/10/6 Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com A quick look on wikipedia and PE format (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Executable) shows that PE is somewhat related to a unix COFF format. Perhaps the same trick is possible on *nix platforms. I

Re: [fossil-users] Linking to fossil.exe [Re: GUI client for Windows?]

and anyone is interested. Cheers, Jacek 2011/10/6 Dmitry Chestnykh dmi...@codingrobots.com: On Oct 6, 2011, at 16:59 , Jacek Cała wrote: I've just realized that despite fossil is an executable it does not prevent if from exporting functions for other programs to use (at least on Windows, am

[fossil-users] Diff after move

Hi All, I moved some files from one dir to another and made some changes. Issuing 'fossil chan' showed me that the files are missing - correct. I ran 'fossil mv' on these files and then 'fossil chan' showed that they're edited - correct. However, when I try to see the changes 'fossil diff' I

Re: [fossil-users] Diff after move

września 2011 16:14 użytkownik Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com napisał: 2011/9/1 Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com fossil.exe: file XXX does not exist in checkin: You also need to do the mv yourself. fossil mv records the intention but does not actually perform the mv on the filesystem. Can't

Re: [fossil-users] Diff after move

1.18 [df9da91ba8] 2011-07-13 23:03:41 UTC'; OS: 'Windows 7 x64' Regards, Jacek W dniu 1 września 2011 16:39 użytkownik Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com napisał: Hi Stephan, Actually, I moved the files. Sorry, forgot to add that my first 'fossil chan' reported some MISSING files which I

Re: [fossil-users] Diff after move

Hello once again, Having no choice I had to commit the changes without prior view. And now from the UI I can do the diff as expected and see changes in the files that were moved. Regards, Jacek W dniu 1 września 2011 17:00 użytkownik Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com napisał: Hi again

[fossil-users] trouble with 'localauth'

Hi all, I can confirm that there is some problem with automatic log in from localhost. I tried setting localauth and using '--localauth' option and both 'server' and 'ui' and couldn't get it. My fossil is the latest binary distribution: 13/04/2011, running on win7 and opera. Regards,

Re: [fossil-users] trouble with 'localauth'

The same for me fossil new xxx.fossil fossil ui xxx.fossil does not log in me automatically (Opera, Firefox). I forgot to add I use x64 win7. Perhaps it matters that this is x64 or win7 x64. Anyone else with different win or win7 x32? Regards, Jacek 2011/5/6 Tomek Kott

Re: [fossil-users] http-port settings

and overwrites the global one Regards Hein Am 08.02.2011 um 23:10 schrieb Jacek Cała: Hmmm... On my Windows box it looks like this: C:\fossil settings http-port http-port            (global) 8081 C:\fossil server c:\apps\fossil.repo\vertical-deployment.fossil Listening for HTTP requests

[fossil-users] http-port settings

Hi all, I tried in vain to set different http port with command 'fossil settings http-port'. Regardless of the settings running 'fossil server ...' or 'fossil ui ...' ends up on 8080. Any ideas or this is just a bug? Cheers, Jacek ___

Re: [fossil-users] ticket notifications

Regarding tickets notification, it would be nice if opening/closing tickets allow starting/stopping time measurement. In this way fossil could count up how long it takes to complete tasks. This would be more intentional than in eclipse's mylyn but still very useful. Regards, Jacek 2010/6/24

Re: [fossil-users] ticket notifications

Thanks for ideas I'll try to play with this. Jacek 2010/6/24 Joshua Paine jos...@letterblock.com On 06/24/2010 02:39 PM, Jacek Cała wrote: Regarding tickets notification, it would be nice if opening/closing tickets allow starting/stopping time measurement. In this way fossil could

Re: [fossil-users] Feature request: commit a ticket

Wilson, Ronald rwils...@harris.com: also, sometimes a single ticket requires multiple checkins over time to arrive at a fix. rw from my mobile 434.851.1612 On Mar 14, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Jeremy Cowgar jer...@cowgar.com wrote: On 3/13/2010 7:32 PM, Jacek Cała wrote: fossil commit

[fossil-users] Feature request: commit a ticket

Hi All, What do you think about the following feature? The case is very common, I suppose. Let's have an issue reported by a tester/user as a ticket. When a developer resolves the issue they would like to commit changes that are related to the ticket describing this issue. AFAIK in fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Done a helpful hint. Was: Export repo

Thanks for this! This will be really useful. Jacek 2010/3/11 D. Richard Hipp d...@hwaci.com See http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/ci/2582ecf2ed A helpful hint (which applies to more than just the zip command): In most places where a version or check-in name is request, you can substitute

Re: [fossil-users] Not all tickets are problems

For me tickets are ok and by default you have type 'Task' configured. If you create a report that filters by this, isn't it enough? Regards, Jacek 2010/2/10 Ron Aaron r...@ronware.org Concerning ticket [2b79f36e5a], I agree with the notion. However, I would take it a bit further and

[fossil-users] Numbering in the ticket view

Hi, Do you have any idea how to add numbering to the list of tickets. It would be nice to have a quantitative view on the solved/unsolved issues. I was skimming through the sqllite manual but couldn't find anything usable. Jacek ___ fossil-users

[fossil-users] Ticket system - blockers

Hi all, I wonder if there is any simple way to add `blocker' feature to the fossil's ticketing system (I mean a list of tickets that prevent one to complete). I tried adding 'CREATE TABLE blocker(...)' in the Admin-Tickets-Table page and then when creating a new ticket report it says: * **Syntax

[fossil-users] add rm directory

Hi, I noticed a kind of asymmetry between 'add' and 'rm' commands. While it is possible to add directory contents to a repository I cannot find a way to easily remove it. fossil add my_dir works fine, whereas fossil rm my_dir does not. Am I missing something? Cheers, Jacek

Re: [fossil-users] add rm directory

Yes, but I meant easy. As easy as fossil add my_dir. Jacek 2009/9/25 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com 2009/9/25 Jacek Cała jacek.c...@gmail.com I noticed a kind of asymmetry between 'add' and 'rm' commands. While it is possible to add directory contents to a repository I cannot find