On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov
flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
[...]
But please don't also miss out a first-hand experience of someone who
implemented a well-visible program centered around Lua: [1], [2].
Personally, I find that minimality (of the runtime) is the
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Natacha Porté nata...@instinctive.eu wrote:
If you don't mind, I'd rather have it not named at all.
Due to how it's (still) heavily loaded with negative emotions, I would
like not having
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell
How would fossil merge
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 06:57:02PM -0400, Leo Razoumov wrote:
And I do not see the extra a because I have the following line in
the beginning of my ~/.bashrc
# If not running interactively, don't do anything
[ -z
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 09:34, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On a server, I often have multiple CGI scripts all pointing to the same
repository. A similar feature, added at the same time, keeps track of all
of the possible URLs for accessing a repository. On the main Fossil
webserver
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 09:45, Kevin Quick qu...@sparq.org wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:46:49 -0700, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
And at least in UNIX you really
do not want making your repository writable by several people.
Huh? Bob works on stuff and commits it. After Bob
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 13:43, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
others (chmod 0644 repo.fossil). In the case of CGI the owner is
whatever your http server likes (www-data on Ubuntu).
Tip: many CGI environments
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 13:00, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Fossil design clearly separates a project repository database from
Hi All,
the recent changes to the trunk make fossil open to modify the
fossil repository being opened.
If this repository is read-only or mounted on a read-only file system
than fossil open fails [2] and no _FOSSIL_ file is created.
I would prefer the solution proposed by Matt Welland [1] to keep
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:08, Kevin Quick qu...@sparq.org wrote:
This isn't quite as convincing an argument to me: I can see the utility of a
pull/sync from a read-only repository, but a fossil open implies that one
will be doing work with the opened contents and further implies that one
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 07:25, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
(3) Rational for violating long-standing Fossil design principle that
project repo database does not know its checkouts.
This sounds like
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 07:18, Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name wrote:
Before finishing edit the message, I realised I don't want to commit those
changes that way, I prefer to do a little more change. I quit the edtior
without
saving changes, and fossil commits my changes with the old
Hi Everyone,
I am sorry if I am asking something trivial but I am not a SQL expert.
I have a ticket report that lists all open and active tickets. I would
like its first column to simply show row numbers starting with 1 for
the first row of the report, 2 for the second row and so on. Google
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 16:33, ST smn...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Bill,
however I didn't understand what I need to do in order to be able to
create a link like this:
a href=file://$pathToProject/doc/html/index.htmlproject/a
Do I have to reimplement something?
I think there is a simple
2012/3/24 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 04:39:52PM -0400, Leo Razoumov wrote:
That patch is since some weeks in a branch I maintain with the annoyances I
consider worth fixing, and features worth having (as far as I can program).
http://fossil-scm.org
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 17:26, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 8:06 PM, H.C. Chen hcchen5...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, it's very very helpful and have saved me a lot of time.
I'd like to add,
changes
addremove
init
FWIW: i've been using
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 17:42, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
I understand one can use fossil without changes or addremove but
how can you survive since 2007 without init ??
fossil new foo.fsl
mkdir foo
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 03:12, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
Hello!
In our search for adequate markup to be used for our upcoming
open-source project, we stumbled upon AsciiDoc
(http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/) and, so far, like it very
much and decided to use it instead of reST/Sphinx,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:16, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:52:12 +0100
Ephrim Khong dr.khong+fos...@gmail.com
wrote:
It seems, though, that the AsciiDoc-Backend simply translates text
from AsciiDoc-Markup to Fossil-Markup.
Correct.
I think it would be better to
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:23, Themba Fletcher
themba.fletc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 15:04 -0400, Leo Razoumov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 09:57, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
Why not just fossil revert my/file.txt?
For each one of dozens of files in the manifest
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 13:25, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
i don't know about Ubuntu1, but dropbox synchronizes only the bytes which
changed, so the sync is really fast. There is, however, still a couple
caveats with this approach (sorry for my brevity earlier - i was on my
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 14:53, Ron Aaron r...@ronware.org wrote:
On 03/21/2012 08:06 PM, Leo Razoumov wrote:
True, but does not help if your file is encrypted. You change a single
byte of your plain-text-file and your encrypted version changes
entirely.
Precisely so. And I don't want
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 17:17, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Ron Aaron r...@ronware.org wrote:
So what I am looking for is a way to take a 'snapshot' of a repo, and
determine if the new version of that repo is actually different, even
though I may
Hi there,
GIT has a useful merge strategy git merge -s ours that always
chooses our current version over the version being merged in. The
resulting merge has exactly the same files contents as its base
parent. The only difference being that the commit merged in is now
added to the list of merge
table).
All I want is to record a new merge parent without merging in file contents.
--Leo--
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 14:14, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
GIT has a useful merge strategy git merge -s ours that always
chooses our current version over the version being merged
.
In general I would recommend to stay away from special chars like
*^#* in your password. If you are concerned with your password
security make your password longer. 64^8 is greater than 70^7.
--Leo--
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 04:18, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
What do you mean 'pre-existing'? Software is created by you. Can you
show me some sotware project using names with such funky characters?
Gour,
one size fits all does not work in real life. For instance, brackets,
spaces, etc. are
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 07:11, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Perhaps we could/should make the set of illegal characters a config option,
defaulting to the current set?
This may cause problem with globing.
--Leo--
___
fossil-users mailing
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 13:02, Thomas Stover c...@thomasstover.com wrote:
-Algorithmically verify that changes are signed by trusted users on push/pull
operations.
(this is also a question)
Theoretically, it is sufficient to sign a leaf manifest so that entire
part of the DAG that grows out
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 22:03, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 18:03, Brian Smith br...@linuxfood.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com
wrote:
Looking
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 19:11, Brian Smith br...@linuxfood.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 18:03, Brian Smith br...@linuxfood.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com
wrote
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 19:37, Themba Fletcher themba.fletc...@gmail.com wrote:
If I understand correctly, what happened at github was that someone exploited
a misconfiguration in the rails framework to insert his own public key as
trusted with respect to several repositories.
The fossil
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 06:21, Ștefan Fulea fulea.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
Fossil doesn't seem to get along with square brackets:
Z:\fossil add file[N].x
Z:\fossil.exe: filename contains illegal characters: file[N].x
Confirmed on Linux with fossil trunk [7367cec4c8]. Escaping brackets
does not
In light of a recent Github compromise https://lwn.net/Articles/485162/
I am curious of how one can detect and repair a compromised fossil site??
--Leo--
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 18:25, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
In light of a recent Github compromise https://lwn.net/Articles/485162/
I am curious of how one can detect and repair a compromised fossil site
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 18:49, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
What happens if an attacker can shun artifacts, rebuild database, edit
commit messages, events, tickets, etc?
Fossil sync might happily pull compromised
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 03:50, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
FYI: the JSON API doesn't aim to handle functionality which works directly
with a checkout, e.g. checkout, commit, pull, push, update. It's main aim is
to provide more or less the same data needed for implementing
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 03:50, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Correct - i don't think we'll be able to do that kind of feature in JSON,
largely because JSON doesn't do binary. The closest thing to commit i
think we'll be able to portably/sensibly pull off is handling embedded docs
, but, I'll try to carve out some
time this
afternoon to summarize the open questions and give an overview of what I'd
like
to push into a branch on the master repo once the feature has more testing.
-B
On Saturday, February 25, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Leo Razoumov wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 21
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 09:16, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
Brian,
for simplicity you might want to follow the selection rules that
already exist in fossil web-interface.
When I go to the web-interface=Branches
2012/3/1 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name:
Hello,
in fossil 1.21, I've a modified openoffice file. Then I run fossil update,
and
it tells me there is a merge conflict with a binary file, that it cannot
merge.
What I'm surprised about is that fossil overwrites my local changes with
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 18:04, Brian Smith br...@linuxfood.net wrote:
On Thursday, March 1, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Leo Razoumov wrote:
Brian,
for simplicity you might want to follow the selection rules that
already exist in fossil web-interface.
When I go to the web-interface=Branches and select
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 07:28, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
Assuming we go with Fossil 2.0, can somebody propose a list of interface
changes that are needed. We don't want to repeat this exercise if it can be
avoided, so let's fix everything all at once. Here's a start:
(1) fossil
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 13:00, Tomek Kott tkott.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Leo, did you know you can type 'fossil time' from the cmd line to get the
last 10 commits? then just use the first 3-6 characters to reference the
correct parent, that way avoiding the command line.
How can I do it in a
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 16:47, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Indeed! How does this look:
i got tired of waiting ;) and went ahead with:
a) removed parentUuid
b) defined the first element in the parents array to be the primary
parent.
Thanks for your effort! Time permitting I
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 07:59, Ramon Ribó ram...@compassis.com wrote:
(1) fossil rm removes the files from the disk
(2) fossil mv renames the files on disk
(3) fossil settings crnl-glob **
(4) fossil update == fossil update current
(5) Unlimited undo (purgin old undos after a defined
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:22, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 07:59, Ramon Ribó ram...@compassis.com wrote:
(1) fossil rm removes the files from the disk
(2) fossil mv renames the files on disk
(3) fossil settings crnl-glob **
(4) fossil update == fossil
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 04:48, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
I sincerely hope that fossil was not designed with only one work-flow
(SQLite and fossil) in mind. Am I mistaken?
If i'm not sorely mistaken
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 02:26, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:13:15 -0500
Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing that I miss in fossil above everything else is inability to
push/pull individual branches or/and individual artifacts. This is
really big item
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 09:17, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
A key philosophical design principle of Fossil is no erasures. This is
how business financial accounting is (or used to be) done. You write in
ink.
I am fine with this philosophy of no-rewriting of published history.
And I
Hi List,
I am trying to accomplish a cascading work-flow Personal.fossil -
Team.fossil - Public.fossil without history rewriting.
Right now fossil has concept of private branches that are tagged
with private. Those branches are pushed/pulled only in presence of
--private option. Everything else
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 14:19, Eric e...@deptj.eu wrote:
On Sat, February 25, 2012 5:44 pm, Leo Razoumov wrote:
I am fine with this philosophy of no-rewriting of published history.
And I am *not* asking for a git rebase equivalent.
But I have to follow a work-flow that consists of a cascade
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 18:17, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
Heh today after more detailed reading of the docs, I've 'found out'
that fossil scrub --private might be good enough as replacing hg's MQ
extension...Was absent the whole day and will try tomorrow.
Be aware that fossil scrub
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 09:17, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
A key philosophical design principle of Fossil is no erasures. This is
how business financial accounting is (or used to be) done. You write in
ink. If an error is found, you annotate the erroneous entry with a note of
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 21:30, Jan Danielsson
jan.m.daniels...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/26/12 03:09, altufa...@mail.com wrote:
Why not just productize limsync?
Going by what Brian Smith has written, it's a question of having time
do work on it and handling a few special cases.
Brian, if
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 02:53, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:46:15 -0500
Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
I am sorry if my language was not clear. Here are the diagrams:
I am sorry to jump in this thread...we might soon start working on our
application which
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 15:12, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 08:55:09 -0500 Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
If the code above does not work you can try poor-man's approach with
the patch (untested)
fossil co E
fossil diff --from P1-parent --to P3 | patch
Â
Hi List,
I have a repo with three brunches: trunk, BR1.prv and BR2.
trunk and BR2 were created public while BR1.prv was created private.
After some commits in all the branches I tag branching point of public
BR2 with a propagating private tag:
$ fossil tag add --propagate --raw private checkinID
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 08:05, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
Right. Be sure to use the latest version of Fossil (not the latest
*released* version, but rather one that you build yourself from the tip of
trunk). Then if you run fossil rebuild, I think it might begin to honor
your
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 14:15, Brian Smith br...@linuxfood.net wrote:
For what it's worth, I was working on limited branch syncing awhile back.
I never got around to merging it back into the master fossil repo, but, I
think at least your use case is functional..
Very recently fossil_getenv function was introduced as a wrapper
around standard getenv to get Unicode right.
In file.c:
/*
** Return the value of an environment variable as UTF8.
*/
char *fossil_getenv(const char *zName){
char *zValue = getenv(zName);
#ifdef _WIN32
if( zValue ) zValue =
2012/2/16 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 06:37:49AM -0500, Leo Razoumov wrote:
In Unix it returns pointer pointing into actual environment (should
not be modified or deallocated). In Windows, on the other hand,
fossil_mbcs_to_utf8 allocates memory via
2012/2/16 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 07:09:22AM -0500, Leo Razoumov wrote:
2012/2/16 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 06:37:49AM -0500, Leo Razoumov wrote:
In Unix it returns pointer pointing into actual environment
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:00, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
I was once open to this kind of thing. But since the security risks have
been pointed out to me, I'm now very reluctant to do anything like this.
TH1 is secure by virtual of being minimalist. It really doesn't do much
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 13:43, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
Try pressing Reload several times to convince Chrome to load the newest
CSS.
In order to force CSS reload go to Admin-Skins, change to any skin
and then change back to the default skin.
--Leo--
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 14:15, Brian Smith br...@linuxfood.net wrote:
For what it's worth, I was working on limited branch syncing awhile back.
I never got around to merging it back into the master fossil repo, but, I
think at least your use case is functional..
Hi All,
AFAIK, fossil does not provide full-text search of wiki pages.
Is there a plugin or extension that does it?
So far I was only able to find a shell script in the fossil Cookbook
which is just a wrapper around grep.
--Leo--
___
fossil-users
My comments are interspersed in-between the lines of the original message.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:03, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
No full-text search (FTS) mechanism is currently provided.
Of course, every Fossil repository is an SQLite database and there is a very
powerful FTS
2012/2/15 Роман Донченко dxdra...@yandex.ru:
Hello,
I'm using (well, trying to) Fossil on Windows. My username is Роман.
This happens:
F:\Sourcefossil init test.sqlite
project-id: c162b4ff218ffca0d4f3fe26f20a34fd5c7cf892
server-id: 01814b880714e63786ef5af7b403f5bb4fbee016
admin-user:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:53, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
(4) Scripts are only exchanged between repositories on a fossil clone or
fossil configuration pull/sync. For the latter, detailed warnings about
changes to scripts and recommendations to redo audits might be in order.
IMHO
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 19:15, Bill Burdick bill.burd...@gmail.com wrote:
May I recommend my markdown plugin? It's
here: http://chiselapp.com/user/zot/repository/fossil-pagedown It will let
you use markdown as your wiki language and it also supports XML comments.
Bill,
I cloned the pagedown
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 18:30, Gé Weijers g...@weijers.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au
wrote:
Joe Mistachkin has recently added support for calling TH1 scripts on
certain actions.
See http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/0b61e3c019
In
I would like to put some comments into embedded doc foo.wiki page
which I am editing. Standard HTML comment tag
!-- comments --
does not work. What should I do?
--Leo--
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 08:35, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Fossil doesn't support comments in the wiki. See:
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/wiki_rules
That's really bad for the embedded documentation. Unlike wiki embedded
docs can be edited in any editor and comments are very
Please,
find attached a patch that allows to use HTML comments of the form
!-- . -- in fossil wiki markup. This feature is especially handy
for embedded documentations written using a text editor of choice.
Comments allow to annotate wiki sources in meaningful way, comment out
portions of the
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:43, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
Comments are not supported in wiki precisely because I don't want people,
especially anonymous contributors, to be able hide things from view. The
idea is that all changes should be plainly visible, without having to click
on
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 19:15, Bill Burdick bill.burd...@gmail.com wrote:
May I recommend my markdown plugin? It's
here: http://chiselapp.com/user/zot/repository/fossil-pagedown It will let
you use markdown as your wiki language and it also supports XML comments.
Bill,
thanks you! I will
Following up the mailing list discussion I modified my original patch
to achieve the following behavior:
(1) By default HTML comments !--...-- are *NOT* recognized in wiki
markup, exactly the same way as it is now.
(2) An Admin can switch HTML comments ON in wiki markup by means of a
new
I recently discovered fossil and so far I like it very much. It does
most of the things I need and does them very well.
If I would be asked to name one feature that fossil still lacks I
would name my favorite one:
- Ability to push one branch at a time.
Right now fossil push is all-or-nothing
2012/2/10 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name:
Hello,
But if I run:
$ fossil diff | less
First go the outputs of all the diff commands, and at the end, all the
Index:.. and === in a row. I think the diff_print_index() function that
writes
the Index: and the === needs a flush, to fix
I guess at some point with every SCM system one faces a challenge of
a patch based workflow. I need to maintain a set of patches on a
branch which are periodically reapplied as trunk moves forward. Git
has git rebase, Mercurial has hg mq. What solution does fossil
offer?
--Leo--
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 15:28, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess at some point with every SCM system one faces a challenge of
a patch based workflow. I need to maintain a set of patches on a
branch which
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 15:54, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
fossil update D
fossil merge --cherrypick P1
fossil commit --branch P1p
fossil merge --cherrypick P2
fossil commit --tag P2p
fossil merge --cherrypick P3
fossil commit --tag P3p
Richard,
thanks for the suggestion. Will I
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 18:38, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
I hope that fossil could pre-populate the message with the
text from the commit that is being cherry-picked. It would save lots
of typing.
A very
Hi List,
I ran into a strange problem which results in fossil commit failure
after a specific type of merge.
I attached a self-contained shell script that reproduces the problem.
Tested with trunk version of fossil on Linux.
Here is the problem description.
A fossil repository T.fossil contains
not compile. Now this policy cannot be followed in some
cases. And secondly such inconsistent commits break bisect.
--Leo--
- Original Message -
From: Leo Razoumov
Sent: 02/10/12 03:39 AM
To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
Subject: [fossil-users] fossil commit failure after merge
Hi List
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 19:26, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
The _FOSSIL_ file contains (among other things) your stash and your undo
history. What does
sqlite3_analyzer _FOSSIL_
Hmm, I just compliled/installed sqlite-3.7.10 from its fossil repo and
it did build sqlite3 executable
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 19:26, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi List,
I wonder why _FOSSIL_ file grows so fast. I did some little work with
a clone of fossil source code repository (23MB) and over space of two
days
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:05, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
Probably what happened is that you did some operation that created a large
undo stack, which was stored in the _FOSSIL_ file. Then later, after the
undo expired, that space was freed. If the space utilization is an issue
for
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:05, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
Probably what happened is that you did some operation that created a large
undo stack, which was stored in the _FOSSIL_ file. Then later, after the
undo expired, that space was freed. If the space utilization is an issue
for
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 23:26, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
A lot of people have been telling me that they prefer the unified or
context style in-line diffs over side-by-side diffs. And I have to admit
that sometimes an in-line diff is easier to read and understand. But
side-by-side
Hi Richard,
please, find attached a patch that introduces --brief (short -q)
option to fossil diff that acts analogous to regular diff --brief
or diff -q. It suppresses diff contents and outputs just the file
names that differ. Output format is similar to fossil changes.
But unlike fossil changes
Hi List,
I wonder why _FOSSIL_ file grows so fast. I did some little work with
a clone of fossil source code repository (23MB) and over space of two
days _FOSSIL_ reached 10MB. What gives?
--Leo--
___
fossil-users mailing list
Hi List,
I am trying to clone a repository over ssh complete with all the
private branches by means of
$ fossil clone --private ssh://username:pass@hostname/path-to-Repo my.fossil
Prior to doing that I set Private flag for username on the remote
repo using the web interface. The clone operation
Hi Richard,
It seems that clone/push/pull over ssh ignore ssh://USER:PASSWORD
settings and always connect to a remote fossil end as nobody. As a
result
* One cannot push anything to a remote repo (unless nobody is
granted developer privileges)
* clone/pull private branches does not work
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 09:24, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Richard,
It seems that clone/push/pull over ssh ignore ssh://USER:PASSWORD
settings and always connect to a remote fossil end as nobody.
Richard,
Thank you very much for pushing a prompt fix to the trunk [a928c89cb18
Hi List,
I am trying to clone my repository over SSH complete with all my
private branches. So far I have had no luck. I compiled fossil on
Ubuntu-10.04 from its current trunk version and that's what I am
getting:
$ fossil clone --private
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 12:16, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi List,
I am trying to clone my repository over SSH complete with all my
private branches. So far I have had no luck.
What options should I enable
2012/2/5 Lluís Batlle i Rossell vi...@viric.name:
Hello,
I wonder how people keep code based on a public fossil repository,
but without making the derivaiton public. Of course, with the ability to keep
all in sync easily, as if all was in a single VCS.
There are the private branches... but
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:36, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
Retro diff (2) looks really bad in Google Chrome-16 and in
Firefox-3.6.24, see attached chrome screen-shot (Ubuntu-10.04).
Huh. On Ubuntu 11.10 running
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
