On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:56 PM, K k...@lightpowered.org wrote:
Hello,
I've done a number of fossil mv file.h source/code/ today, then issued a
commit. The check-in reports that all of the files I've moved have been
deleted and renamed.
For example:
Deleted foo.c version
-scm.org
Sent: Monday, 17 December 2012, 8:39
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] File moves reported in commit as file deletion!
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:56 PM, K k...@lightpowered.org wrote:
Hello,
I've done a number of fossil mv file.h source/code/ today, then issued a
commit. The check
on Dec 17, 2012, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:56 PM, K k...@lightpowered.org wrote:
Hello,
I've done a number of fossil mv file.h source/code/ today, then issued a
commit.
The check-in reports that all of the files I've moved have been deleted and
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:55 PM, K k...@lightpowered.org wrote:
I'm looking at the page for my file and its history ends as deleted when I
did not delete it. I moved it, which fossil changes reported as a RENAMED.
I commited and now have the surprise dumped on me that my file was deleted
and
As I said, I did not DELETE any files, but rather moved them. fossil changes
reported them as RENAMED. And in the check in, they are being reported as
DELETED.
I'm just asking how in the design of Fossil you justified this decision. Please
directly address this vs skirting it.
^K
on Dec
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 3:49 PM, K k...@lightpowered.org wrote:
As I said, I did not DELETE any files, but rather moved them. fossil
changes reported them as RENAMED. And in the check in, they are being
reported as DELETED.
I'm just asking how in the design of Fossil you justified this
I don't need to make assumptions, and therefore am not. I'm going off of the
facts, which I can observe, and which I can present to others.
The file was not deleted. It was moved using Fossil's own fossil mv command.
It's irrational to treat this as a deletion.
If you cannot provide
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:58 PM, K k...@lightpowered.org wrote:
If you cannot provide justification for this behavior snip
I'm a bit confused by the tone of some of the messages on the list lately.
This could have as easily been worded as a polite bug report, but
instead comes across as
When some arbitrary decision/value such as a minimum length of wiki pages
imposes itself for no rational reason on my workflow, and I'm told by the
maintainer to maintain a separate personal branch rather than this being
changed in the main source, I started leaving my Richard Hipp fan club
You know, for someone using a tool that hasn't paid for it, you have a real
tone of overweening entitlement. Perhaps you need to look up the
definitions involved in free software and open source software. You
may wish, in particular, to pay attention to the portions of it that
involve how to get
Thanks for sharing!
^K
on Dec 17, 2012, Michael Richter ttmrich...@gmail.com wrote:
You know, for someone using a tool that hasn't paid for it, you have a real
tone of
overweening entitlement. Perhaps you need to look up the definitions involved
in
free software and open source software.
Hello,
I've done a number of fossil mv file.h source/code/ today, then issued a
commit. The check-in reports that all of the files I've moved have been deleted
and renamed.
For example:
Deleted foo.c version [0e52b8b63a1e8c0d]
Name change from from foo.c to source/code/foo.c.
Why is a file
12 matches
Mail list logo
