Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-07-10 Thread Rene
On 2012-07-09 15:41, Richard Hipp wrote: On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Baptiste Daroussin baptiste.darous...@gmail.com [6] wrote: 2012/6/7 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org [1]: My priority is to get WYSIWYG wiki editing going, at which point the underlying wiki formatting language becomes

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-07-09 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2012/6/7 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Baptiste Daroussin baptiste.darous...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any status on this? rejected ? still under review ? DRH swamped. But it is on the list of potential changes for the Fossil Code Sprint in Munich on

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-07-09 Thread Richard Hipp
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Baptiste Daroussin baptiste.darous...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/6/7 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Baptiste Daroussin baptiste.darous...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any status on this? rejected ? still under review ?

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-07-09 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2012/7/9 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Baptiste Daroussin baptiste.darous...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/6/7 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Baptiste Daroussin baptiste.darous...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any status on

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-07-09 Thread Stephan Beal
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Yeah. Unfortunately, no actual code writing took place at the code sprint. Though lots of cool ideas were exchanged and developed! i think this particular one probably got forgotten because none of those present are among

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-06-08 Thread Natacha Porté
Hello, on Thursday 07 June 2012 at 12:14, Richard Hipp wrote: On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Baptiste Daroussin baptiste.darous...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any status on this? rejected ? still under review ? DRH swamped. But it is on the list of potential changes for the Fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-06-08 Thread Richard Hipp
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Natacha Porté nata...@instinctive.euwrote: Hello, on Thursday 07 June 2012 at 12:14, Richard Hipp wrote: On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Baptiste Daroussin baptiste.darous...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any status on this? rejected ? still under review

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-06-07 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Is there any status on this? rejected ? still under review ? regards, Bapt ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-06-07 Thread Richard Hipp
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Baptiste Daroussin baptiste.darous...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any status on this? rejected ? still under review ? DRH swamped. But it is on the list of potential changes for the Fossil Code Sprint in Munich on July 3! regards, Bapt

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-05-30 Thread Ron Wilson
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Natacha Porté nata...@instinctive.eu wrote: If you don't mind, I'd rather have it not named at all. Due to how it's (still) heavily loaded with negative emotions, I would like not having to interact with the original project or its repository. And a name

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-05-30 Thread Leo Razoumov
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Natacha Porté nata...@instinctive.eu wrote: If you don't mind, I'd rather have it not named at all. Due to how it's (still) heavily loaded with negative emotions, I would like not having

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-05-30 Thread Natacha Porté
Hello, on Wednesday 23 May 2012 at 15:26, Richard Hipp wrote: Nevertheless, though attached by fraud, the name is still inappropriate, and must be changed before being added to Fossil. Thanks to some invaluable help, I finally managed to get it done (I think). My markdown C library shall

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-05-30 Thread Steve Havelka
On 05/30/2012 02:28 PM, Natacha Porté wrote: Hello, on Wednesday 23 May 2012 at 15:26, Richard Hipp wrote: Nevertheless, though attached by fraud, the name is still inappropriate, and must be changed before being added to Fossil. Thanks to some invaluable help, I finally managed to get it

[fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-05-23 Thread Natacha Porté
Hello, stuff happens, and it turns out that now I have finished integrating my markdown library (libupskirt) into fossil. And I really mean integrating, that is using struct Blob as dynamic buffers and other idioms. I used it to translate *.mkd and *.markdown embedded docs in a similar way as

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-05-23 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Natacha Porté nata...@instinctive.euwrote: I used it to translate *.mkd and *.markdown embedded docs in a similar way as *.wiki are currently translated. FWIW (not that my opinion really matters)... The addition of a more common wiki parser into fossil has

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-05-23 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Natacha Porté nata...@instinctive.euwrote: Hello, stuff happens, and it turns out that now I have finished integrating my markdown library (libupskirt) into fossil. We appreciate your efforts on behalf of Fossil. However, let me be very clear that any

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-05-23 Thread Natacha Porté
on Wednesday 23 May 2012 at 12:18, Richard Hipp wrote: Note that after reading this far, and observing our choice of library names, I have chosen to read no further in your post. Oblivion was such a nice place for me to be... All by apologies for having dared creep out it. pgp2vbVQ9SlGI.pgp

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-05-23 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 06:28:59PM +0200, Natacha Porté wrote: on Wednesday 23 May 2012 at 12:18, Richard Hipp wrote: Note that after reading this far, and observing our choice of library names, I have chosen to read no further in your post. Oblivion was such a nice place for me to be...

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-05-23 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:25 PM, BohwaZ boh...@bohwaz.net wrote: Le Wed, 23 May 2012 12:18:52 -0400, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org a écrit : We appreciate your efforts on behalf of Fossil. However, let me be very clear that any library with the name libupskirt has *zero* chance of ever

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-05-23 Thread Weber, Martin S
On 2012-05-23 12:18 , Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Furthermore, even if you rename libupskirt to something that is completely benign and inoffensive, it will be difficult to rehabilitate the code. Do you mind explaining this bit please, Richard? TIA, -Martin

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-05-23 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Weber, Martin S martin.we...@nist.govwrote: On 2012-05-23 12:18 , Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Furthermore, even if you rename libupskirt to something that is completely benign and inoffensive, it will be difficult to rehabilitate the code. Do you

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-05-23 Thread Weber, Martin S
On 2012-05-23 12:39 , Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Weber, Martin S martin.we...@nist.gov wrote: On 2012-05-23 12:18 , Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Furthermore, even if you rename libupskirt to something that is completely benign and inoffensive, it

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-05-23 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Weber, Martin S martin.we...@nist.govwrote: Not that bit. The bit about even if you rename it to something that is completely inoffensive, it will be difficult to rehabilitate the code. Why is that? The choice of library name suggests that the author does

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-05-23 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: https://www.google.com/search?q=upskirt http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upskirt FWIW, and in Natacha's defense: i'm a native US-English speaker, but i've been away from the States long enough (going on 15 years) that the U word

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-05-23 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: FWIW, and in Natacha's defense: i'm a native US-English speaker, but i've been away from the States long enough (going on 15 years) that the U word entered my vocabulary for the first time today. It cannot be expected

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-05-23 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
The choice of library name suggests that the author does not have a keen eye for beauty, in which case the code is unlikely to be something I would care to work with. Maybe the name of the library just don't represent the same for the author as for you, different culture, etc; but this really

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-05-23 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Baptiste Daroussin baptiste.darous...@gmail.com wrote: This is to bad that this great library is just pushed out because of an unfortunate name which was chosen for a joke (with references, that apparently noone from the native english speaking world get)

Re: [fossil-users] Markdown engine integrated into fossil

2012-05-23 Thread Natacha Porté
on Wednesday 23 May 2012 at 15:26, Richard Hipp wrote: Therefore, I hereby publicly apologize to Natasha for accusing her of generating code that is less than beautiful, based solely on the name of the code. The code is once again a candidate for incorporation into Fossil. Thanks. At this