On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 09:33:05AM +0800, David Baxendale (GMail - Singapore)
wrote:
I don't think Fossil is the right tool for this, take a look at Calibre
(http://calibre-ebook.com/) as an Open Source document management
system, not just an e-book reader.
Calibre can't handle several
Tomek Kott tkott.li...@outlook.com writes:
Might I suggest the following two tools as better suited for this sort
of endeavor?
1) Zotero - http://www.zotero.org/
This looks very interesting, and I can see where I might find a use for
it myself in my personal life. Unfortunately, I don't
C. Thomas Stover c...@thomasstover.com writes:
Well if hardcopy means scanned paper (no ocr) then it sounds like a
very large binary file set.
I'm showing my ignorance, but does OCR matter in this case? We already
have OCR capabilities, and I had intended to scan in the documents using
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:55:09 -0600
Carson Chittom car...@wistly.net wrote:
C. Thomas Stover c...@thomasstover.com writes:
Well if hardcopy means scanned paper (no ocr) then it sounds like a
very large binary file set.
I'm showing my ignorance, but does OCR matter in this case? We
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:53:43 +0100, C. Thomas Stover
c...@thomasstover.com wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:55:09 -0600
Carson Chittom car...@wistly.net wrote:
C. Thomas Stover c...@thomasstover.com writes:
Well if hardcopy means scanned paper (no ocr) then it sounds like a
very large
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:48:20 +0100
Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
FWIW: if the documents are having to be archived for legal reasons
then the OCR versions are essentially only useful for convenience in
searching, and not for legal purposes.
that's good information to know
On Thu,
...@thomasstover.com
To:fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] some questions about fossil-as-document-repo
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:11:49 -0600
Carson Chittomcar...@wistly.net wrote:
Yes, basically, it's the probably should save for later need--mostly
for legal reasons
On 01/17/2013 02:29 PM, Carson Chittom wrote:
But these are not legal documents in the sense I
think you mean--contracts, etc. Our lawyer keeps those. Our use case is more
of a question of one of our staff being able to find something that
documents that previously we did x in case y, so if we
C. Thomas Stover c...@thomasstover.com writes:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:37:46 -0600
Carson Chittom car...@wistly.net wrote:
While I realize that this is a somewhat different emphasis than
fossil's usual orientation, I have suggested to my work superiors
that fossil may be usable for us as a
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:11:49 -0600
Carson Chittom car...@wistly.net wrote:
Yes, basically, it's the probably should save for later need--mostly
for legal reasons. Currently all this is in hardcopy, as I mentioned,
the volume of which has reached such a level as to be simply
impenetrable;
the original scanned copy. I do this for bills and such at home.
I personally don't see fossil as the right tool for a document repo.
Tomek
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:33:09 -0600
From: c...@thomasstover.com
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] some questions about fossil
C. Thomas Stover wrote:
On the other hand, if you are trying to do actual collaborative work on
documents, then it is absolutely critical that in addition to a SCM
system (fossil would be great), that you move to a text/source based
document generation technology.
The real problem is a lack
12 matches
Mail list logo
