Hello,
[ unrelated meta-comment follows ]
On 16 July 2015 at 08:19, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
for bonus points (certainly not necessary), allow multiple -tag/-cancel
flags:
...
I'm a gmail-user, and for some reason they seem to have cranked up
their spam-filter settings
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org
wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone (other than me) tested the changes for enabling amending
checkins from the command line in the check-in-edit branch?
I think it's ready, but it certainly could use additional testing given
Hello,
On 16 July 2015 at 07:06, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote:
Has anyone (other than me) tested the changes for enabling amending
checkins from the command line in the check-in-edit branch?
...
FWIW #2, adjusting check-in background colour of tip is pretty much
the only
Thus said Michai Ramakers on Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:56:49 +0200:
I don't know what the intended behaviour was w.r.t. bogus input on
commandline - e.g. 'fossil amend tip something_bogus' does nothing
(and prints nothing).
Definitely would expect an error here, specifically not
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org
wrote:
Thus said Stephan Beal on Thu, 16 Jul 2015 08:19:00 +0200:
for bonus points (certainly not necessary), allow multiple
f-tag/-cancel lags:
Yes, I considered that but wasn't certain if others would be
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org
wrote:
That wouldn't be hard to add, especially if there is already a routine
to check for hexadecimalish. Are there any colors that
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, Michai Ramakers wrote:
Hello,
On 16 July 2015 at 07:06, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote:
Has anyone (other than me) tested the changes for enabling
amending checkins from the command line in the check-in-edit branch?
Thanks for CLI support. Mostly
Hello,
On 16 July 2015 at 07:06, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote:
Has anyone (other than me) tested the changes for enabling amending
checkins from the command line in the check-in-edit branch?
I think it's ready, but it certainly could use additional testing given
that
I think Andy's suggestion(s) are your best bet but I want to mention what
I've done in the past.
Is your intent to co-mingle same-named branches? I.e. if there is a trunk
in both source repos do you wish to merge both dev streams to a single
trunk? I have done this via brute force in the past and
Thus said Sergei Gavrikov on Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:21:55 +0300:
I also expected that 'fossil amend uuid' will spawn $EDITOR with an
original check-in message likes 'fossil commit' does.
That's actually a good idea. The problem with --comment as currently
implemented is that it allows you to
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:31 PM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm a gmail-user, and for some reason they seem to have cranked up
their spam-filter settings recently.
This is one out of a handful of mails (from you, Stephan :-) to the
list, that ended up in my spam-box in
A question about merging projects:
Given two repositories hosting project A and project B, we want to
merge merge them into a project C. Basically they go into a common
source tree and become sub-projects of the new C project.
One solution is to just build the new source tree and start a new
On Jul 16, 2015 2:31 PM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
[ unrelated meta-comment follows ]
On 16 July 2015 at 08:19, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
for bonus points (certainly not necessary), allow multiple -tag/-cancel
flags:
...
I'm a gmail-user,
13 matches
Mail list logo
