Martin Gagnon wrote:
>
> Strange, "fossil add a_dir_symlink" doesn't works for the case #2 on my
> actual repository, but if I try to reproduce the problem on a brand new
> repo, everything works.. Probably I hit a strange corner case. I will
> try to investigate a bit more..
>
I've added the
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 02:29:58PM -0800, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>
> Martin Gagnon wrote:
> >
> > But if I do:
> > $ fossil add a_dir_symlink/*
> >
> > It add the content.
> >
> > Actually, may be it was intended ?
> >
>
> The way it should work (on the branch) is:
>
> 1. With
Martin Gagnon wrote:
>
> But if I do:
> $ fossil add a_dir_symlink/*
>
> It add the content.
>
> Actually, may be it was intended ?
>
The way it should work (on the branch) is:
1. With allowSymlinks ON, symlinks to both files and
directories are always treated as "normal"
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 01:11:39PM -0800, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>
> Martin Gagnon wrote:
> >
> > $ fossil add a_dir_symlink
> >
> > Nothing happens...
> >
>
> It was a bit more complex than I thought, made a couple more changes.
>
> Hopefully, it will work better now.
Same result with
Martin Gagnon wrote:
>
> $ fossil add a_dir_symlink
>
> Nothing happens...
>
It was a bit more complex than I thought, made a couple more changes.
Hopefully, it will work better now.
--
Joe Mistachkin @ https://urn.to/r/mistachkin
___
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:37:10PM -0800, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>
> Changes on the "symlinks" branch prevent directory symlinks
> from being traversed into if the "allow-symlinks" setting is
> enabled or the "--no-dir-symlinks" flag is specified.
>
> Making this change work correctly also
Changes on the "symlinks" branch prevent directory symlinks
from being traversed into if the "allow-symlinks" setting is
enabled or the "--no-dir-symlinks" flag is specified.
Making this change work correctly also required removing the
forced override of the cached "allow-symlinks" setting from
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 09:25:01PM -0700, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>
> Warren Young wrote:
> >
> > Well, that's a tricky one, innit? Fossil manages files, not directories,
> > but Fossil's view of symlinks is file-like. So is it an apple or an
> > orange?
> >
>
> I've checked in a fix on the
On 13/02/2017 11:12, Jan Nijtmans wrote:
> 2017-02-13 12:09 GMT+01:00 Roy Marples:
>> Is the value displayed in the timeline?
> Yes
>> I'm also unsure about overloading the meaning of tag value . the ui
>> indicates it can be set via the command line so could someone be using
>> it for
2017-02-13 12:09 GMT+01:00 Roy Marples:
> Is the value displayed in the timeline?
Yes
> I'm also unsure about overloading the meaning of tag value . the ui
> indicates it can be set via the command line so could someone be using
> it for something else to store in fossil?
For some tags, like
On 13/02/2017 10:42, Jan Nijtmans wrote:
> 2017-02-13 4:50 GMT+01:00 Roy Marples:
>> 3 has now been implemented in the roy-export branch.
>> Turned out to be quite easy. A database rebuild is required though as an
>> extra field has been added to the tagxref table.
>
> Thanks, Roy! I looked at
On 13/02/2017 09:49, Roy Marples wrote:
>>> * tag comments are imported and exported [2]
>>
>> ?? How does one enter a tag comment from the Fossil command line or
>> this is an import/export only feature?
fossil tag add --comment "A tag test comment" tagtest current
now works.
Roy
2017-02-13 4:50 GMT+01:00 Roy Marples:
> 3 has now been implemented in the roy-export branch.
> Turned out to be quite easy. A database rebuild is required though as an
> extra field has been added to the tagxref table.
Thanks, Roy! I looked at your implementation: cards have to
be in
On 13/02/2017 06:47, Artur Shepilko wrote:
>> * no more silent renaming of master vs trunk [1]
>
> "fossil import --rename-trunk" already allows a choice for a Fossil
> branch name to receive Git's "master" branch.
> A bug was missed in src/import.c:~567 if( fossil_strcmp(z,
> "master")==0 ) z
2017-02-13 0:28 GMT+01:00 Richard Hipp :
>> I guess there was a regression introduced somewhere between [8b03934e]
>> and [fb4b87d9].
>
> Would you be willing to bisect for us?
Sure. I will report my findings later today.
___
15 matches
Mail list logo