Re: [fossil-users] Using fossil as CMS

or something. -- C. Thomas Stover Stover Enterprises, LLC ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

[fossil-users] pushing only specific branches to specific servers?

Is there some way to push just a specific branch to a server other than the private branch feature? For example branch A and B are both stored locally, and are both pushed to server 1, yet only branch B is pushed to server 2. ___ fossil-users mailing

Re: [fossil-users] pushing only specific branches to specific servers?

option. -- C. Thomas Stover Stover Enterprises, LLC ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

[fossil-users] applied DVCS for collaborative work - on the fossil project itself, or otherwise

. Thomas Stover Stover Enterprises, LLC ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] applied DVCS for collaborative work - on the fossil project itself, or otherwise

On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:27:03 -0700 Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote: One partial solution available today is to use http://chiselapp.com. Simply use their clone repo feature with regular pull. What exactly does that do over a regular clone pull? -- www.thomasstover.com

Re: [fossil-users] some questions about fossil-as-document-repo

back on how it goes in practice. -- C. Thomas Stover www.thomasstover.com ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] some questions about fossil-as-document-repo

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:55:09 -0600 Carson Chittom car...@wistly.net wrote: C. Thomas Stover c...@thomasstover.com writes: Well if hardcopy means scanned paper (no ocr) then it sounds like a very large binary file set. I'm showing my ignorance, but does OCR matter in this case? We

Re: [fossil-users] some questions about fossil-as-document-repo

of a DVCS style metadata logging and control facility to a rsync style technology. Kind of like some of the interpretations of distributed file system back in the plan 9 lineage of thought for instance. C. Thomas Stover www.thomasstover.com ___ fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on Windows NT 4.0

. Drop me line off list some day about retro-computing. -- C. Thomas Stover www.thomasstover.com ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

[fossil-users] source viewing code

how feasible it would be to use some server side code for syntax highlighting. -- C. Thomas Stover www.thomasstover.com ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil

Re: [fossil-users] source viewing code

.) -- C. Thomas Stover www.thomasstover.com ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

[fossil-users] AIX 7.1

./configure --CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include --LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib - lsqlite3 ./configure --disable-internal-sqlite My work around has been a kludge with running fossil on a Linux system with sshfs + symlinks, but maybe there a chance this is fixed, and I'm doing it wrong. -- C. Thomas Stover

Re: [fossil-users] AIX 7.1

On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:40:39 -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:30 PM, C. Thomas Stover On AIX 7.1, I get the following SQLite error on a open (jfs2 file system): /usr/local/bin/fossil: SQLITE_IOERR: os_unix.c:28318: (9) fsync(/home/ username/directory/project.fossil

Re: [fossil-users] AIX 7.1

acceptable. -- C. Thomas Stover www.thomasstover.com ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users