On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 03:15:09 +0100, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Themba Fletcher
themba.fletc...@gmail.comwrote:
Could I humbly suggest unmanage for the name of the
remove-from-repo-and-leave-the-disk-alone command? This would be
consistent with the
Hello,
It seems that some of those who are opposed to changing the behavior
of rm/mv are reaching a consensus that the names rm and mv were
poorly chosen, because they have a Unix connotation, and rename and
move has been suggested instead. So -- is there any reason we can't
have both?
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Jan Danielsson
jan.m.daniels...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
It seems that some of those who are opposed to changing the behavior
of rm/mv are reaching a consensus that the names rm and mv were
poorly chosen, because they have a Unix connotation, and rename and
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Jan Danielsson jan.m.daniels...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
It seems that some of those who are opposed to changing the behavior
of rm/mv are reaching a consensus that the names rm and mv
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Themba Fletcher
themba.fletc...@gmail.comwrote:
Could I humbly suggest unmanage for the name of the
remove-from-repo-and-leave-the-disk-alone command? This would be
consistent with the status messages emitted by fossil (I think on
merge?) and it's pretty
On 12/15/12 03:15, Richard Hipp wrote:
[---]
It is suggested to me (off-list) that it would be too disruptive to
abruptly change the meaning of fossil rm to start deleting from disk. So
I propose a staged implementation:
Stage 1:
(a) fossil rm -f deletes from disk (if it is safe to do so)
On 12/14/2012 06:15 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Themba Fletcher
themba.fletc...@gmail.com mailto:themba.fletc...@gmail.com wrote:
Could I humbly suggest unmanage for the name of the
remove-from-repo-and-leave-the-disk-alone command? This would be
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 03:44:28AM +0100, Jan Danielsson wrote:
On 12/15/12 03:15, Richard Hipp wrote:
[---]
It is suggested to me (off-list) that it would be too disruptive to
abruptly change the meaning of fossil rm to start deleting from disk. So
I propose a staged implementation:
8 matches
Mail list logo