Re: [fossil-users] Obvious solution to the rm/mv problem?

2012-12-15 Thread j. v. d. hoff
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 03:15:09 +0100, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Themba Fletcher themba.fletc...@gmail.comwrote: Could I humbly suggest unmanage for the name of the remove-from-repo-and-leave-the-disk-alone command? This would be consistent with the

[fossil-users] Obvious solution to the rm/mv problem?

2012-12-14 Thread Jan Danielsson
Hello, It seems that some of those who are opposed to changing the behavior of rm/mv are reaching a consensus that the names rm and mv were poorly chosen, because they have a Unix connotation, and rename and move has been suggested instead. So -- is there any reason we can't have both?

Re: [fossil-users] Obvious solution to the rm/mv problem?

2012-12-14 Thread Richard Hipp
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Jan Danielsson jan.m.daniels...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, It seems that some of those who are opposed to changing the behavior of rm/mv are reaching a consensus that the names rm and mv were poorly chosen, because they have a Unix connotation, and rename and

Re: [fossil-users] Obvious solution to the rm/mv problem?

2012-12-14 Thread Themba Fletcher
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Jan Danielsson jan.m.daniels...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, It seems that some of those who are opposed to changing the behavior of rm/mv are reaching a consensus that the names rm and mv

Re: [fossil-users] Obvious solution to the rm/mv problem?

2012-12-14 Thread Richard Hipp
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Themba Fletcher themba.fletc...@gmail.comwrote: Could I humbly suggest unmanage for the name of the remove-from-repo-and-leave-the-disk-alone command? This would be consistent with the status messages emitted by fossil (I think on merge?) and it's pretty

Re: [fossil-users] Obvious solution to the rm/mv problem?

2012-12-14 Thread Jan Danielsson
On 12/15/12 03:15, Richard Hipp wrote: [---] It is suggested to me (off-list) that it would be too disruptive to abruptly change the meaning of fossil rm to start deleting from disk. So I propose a staged implementation: Stage 1: (a) fossil rm -f deletes from disk (if it is safe to do so)

Re: [fossil-users] Obvious solution to the rm/mv problem?

2012-12-14 Thread Steve Havelka
On 12/14/2012 06:15 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Themba Fletcher themba.fletc...@gmail.com mailto:themba.fletc...@gmail.com wrote: Could I humbly suggest unmanage for the name of the remove-from-repo-and-leave-the-disk-alone command? This would be

Re: [fossil-users] Obvious solution to the rm/mv problem?

2012-12-14 Thread Chad Perrin
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 03:44:28AM +0100, Jan Danielsson wrote: On 12/15/12 03:15, Richard Hipp wrote: [---] It is suggested to me (off-list) that it would be too disruptive to abruptly change the meaning of fossil rm to start deleting from disk. So I propose a staged implementation: