On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:36, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
Retro diff (2) looks really bad in Google Chrome-16 and in
Firefox-3.6.24, see attached chrome screen-shot (Ubuntu-10.04).
Huh. On Ubuntu 11.10 running
: [fossil-users] Retro side-by-side diffs
On 2012-02-03 12:31 , Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl wrote:
I'm for color-coded. All of the reasons have already been listed in the
thread.
Same here.
-Martin
___
fossil-users mailing list
To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Retro side-by-side diffs
On 2012-02-03 12:31 , Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl
wrote:
I'm for color-coded. All of the reasons have already been listed in the
thread.
Same here.
-Martin
On 02/04/12 11:08, altufa...@mail.com wrote:
Same here. I like the colorful diff.
But I would like to know (sorry if I missed) what's th eproblem with color
sbs and what are we getting with retro sbs?
The reason is that we have two different places in the code which do
the same thing
and immediately see that one line has
changed. The change pops out at me. I don't have to think about it - it
is just there.
- Altu
- Original Message -
From: Weber, Martin S
Sent: 02/03/12 11:03 PM
To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Retro side
there.
- Altu
- Original Message -
From: Weber, Martin S
Sent: 02/03/12 11:03 PM
To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Retro side-by-side diffs
On 2012-02-03 12:31 , Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl wrote:
I'm for color-coded. All
that one line has
changed. The change pops out at me. I don't have to think about it - it
is just there.
- Altu
- Original Message -
From: Weber, Martin S
Sent: 02/03/12 11:03 PM
To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Retro side-by-side diffs
On 2012
: [fossil-users] Retro side-by-side diffs
On 2012-02-03 12:31 , Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl
wrote:
I'm for color-coded. All of the reasons have already been listed in
the
thread.
Same here.
-Martin
___
fossil-users
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 07:24, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
Here is an example, two different websites showing the same Fossil project
(TCL), one with the traditional colorful diff and the other with the new
retro diff:
(1) http://core.tcl.tk/tcl/ci/4ebc3a8e1e?sbs=1
(2)
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 07:24, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
Here is an example, two different websites showing the same Fossil
project
(TCL), one with the traditional colorful diff and the other with the new
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:36, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
Here is an example, two different websites showing the same Fossil
project
(TCL), one with the traditional colorful diff and the other with the new
retro diff:
(1) http://core.tcl.tk/tcl/ci/4ebc3a8e1e?sbs=1
(2)
For some time now, the SQLite and Fossil websites have been running on the
retro-sbsdiff branch of Fossil. The retro-sbsdiff branch uses a vastly
simplified format for the side-by-side diffs that omits all of the colors
and decoration and provides plain-text output - essentially the same output
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 10:25:41AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
For some time now, the SQLite and Fossil websites have been running on the
retro-sbsdiff branch of Fossil. The retro-sbsdiff branch uses a vastly
simplified format for the side-by-side diffs that omits all of the colors
and
On 02/03/12 16:25, Richard Hipp wrote:
[---]
Are there strong preferences one way or another?
There are two aspects I prefer with the original:
- I think color coding makes it easier to get a quick overview of
what's happened in a diff. (I see a lot of red is roughly
optimizations, I see a
My preference would be to keep the color SBS diffs, at least as a skin
option or something, since I find it easier to notice changes and match
them up. Maybe somewhere in the documentation on the header / skin, there
could be css for a default coloring of the sbs diffs that one could copy
into the
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
For some time now, the SQLite and Fossil websites have been running on the
retro-sbsdiff branch of Fossil. The retro-sbsdiff branch uses a vastly
simplified format for the side-by-side diffs that omits all of the colors
and
On 02/03/12 17:01, Tomek Kott wrote:
My preference would be to keep the color SBS diffs, at least as a skin
option or something, since I find it easier to notice changes and match
them up. Maybe somewhere in the documentation on the header / skin, there
could be css for a default coloring of
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Jan Danielsson
jan.m.daniels...@gmail.comwrote:
- I haven't looked at the code lately, but does the web sbsdiff
support the width argument in some manner? For quite a few diffs I've
been looking at lately, static 80 characters wide panes leaves a lot of
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 11:19:38AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Jan Danielsson
jan.m.daniels...@gmail.comwrote:
- I haven't looked at the code lately, but does the web sbsdiff
support the width argument in some manner? For quite a few diffs I've
been
On 2/3/2012 7:25 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
For some time now, the SQLite and Fossil websites have been running on the
retro-sbsdiff branch of Fossil. The retro-sbsdiff branch uses a vastly
simplified format for the side-by-side diffs that omits all of the colors and
decoration and provides
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Andreas Kupries
andre...@activestate.comwrote:
On 2/3/2012 7:25 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
For some time now, the SQLite and Fossil websites have been running on the
retro-sbsdiff branch of Fossil. The retro-sbsdiff branch uses a vastly
simplified format for
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Weber, Martin S martin.we...@nist.govwrote:
On 2012-02-03 12:31 , Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl wrote:
I'm for color-coded. All of the reasons have already been listed in the
thread.
Same here.
If not color coded, perhaps adding
I'd be happy with Stephan's suggestion, since it would satisfy both parties
with a little work on the colorizing side. I think the only additional
point is to have the div or whatever surrounds the code to have a good
descriptive class we can latch on to with JS.
Tomek
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at
On 02/03/12 18:40, Stephan Beal wrote:
I'm for color-coded. All of the reasons have already been listed in the
thread.
Same here.
If not color coded, perhaps adding add/change/remove markers to the _start_
of each line, since that would make JS-scripting the colorification
relatively
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Jan Danielsson
jan.m.daniels...@gmail.comwrote:
I wouldn't like that change very much. I think the way and are
used now is very intuitive, and it creates a nice separator column with
i agree but having them in the middle makes it literally impossible to
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 08:33:41PM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote:
How much work would it be to put together a proof-of-concept sbsdiff
colorizer?
The new diffs can't reliably be colored using JS because of potential
syntactic ambiguities. It would work often but not always.
The sbs diffs
26 matches
Mail list logo
