On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote:
My vote is to go with the new behaviour only. More options usually means
more pain - albeit after getting though any transition troubles.
+1
--
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
On 2013-07-12 01:49, Andy Bradford wrote:
Thus said Rene on Thu, 11 Jul 2013 22:31:48 +0200:
I would prefer to not have that option. test-http is for testing a
new
transport method. If you give someone read acces to your ssh repo
then
test-http circumvents that. In fact test-htp makes you
Thus said Rene on Thu, 11 Jul 2013 22:31:48 +0200:
I would prefer to not have that option. test-http is for testing a new
transport method. If you give someone read acces to your ssh repo then
test-http circumvents that. In fact test-htp makes you while connected
setup user
I agree with you
My vote is to go with the new behaviour only. More options usually means
more pain - albeit after getting though any transition troubles.
I am biased in this. The old method seemed brittle. However I haven't yet
tested your new code. Hopefully I'll get a chance to do that next week some
time.
Folks,
As I mentioned before, I've been attempting some modifications to the
fossil SSH URL handling. I'm at a point where I could use some feedback
regarding the previous method for handling SSH.
Originally, fossil would fork an SSH connection and then communicate
with the remote shell
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.orgwrote:
...
Is there value in keeping this old method? I personally don't see any,
but then I don't have the background to know why it was done this way.
If i'm not sorely mistaken, the current approach was done
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:51:05AM -0600, Andy Bradford wrote:
Folks,
As I mentioned before, I've been attempting some modifications to the
fossil SSH URL handling. I'm at a point where I could use some feedback
regarding the previous method for handling SSH.
[snip]
I like the idea
On 2013-07-10 21:31, Martin Gagnon wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:51:05AM -0600, Andy Bradford wrote:
Folks,
As I mentioned before, I've been attempting some modifications to
the
fossil SSH URL handling. I'm at a point where I could use some
feedback
regarding the previous method for
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:32:26PM +0200, Rene wrote:
On 2013-07-10 21:31, Martin Gagnon wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:51:05AM -0600, Andy Bradford wrote:
Folks,
As I mentioned before, I've been attempting some modifications
to the
fossil SSH URL handling. I'm at a point where I
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 05:24:29PM -0400, Martin Gagnon wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:32:26PM +0200, Rene wrote:
On 2013-07-10 21:31, Martin Gagnon wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:51:05AM -0600, Andy Bradford wrote:
Folks,
As I mentioned before, I've been attempting some
Thus said Martin Gagnon on Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:50:40 -0400:
Sorry, *my* mistake.. I didn't notice the new version of the patch on
latest Andy Bradford email. My test was made with the previous patch.
Not a problem. I should probably setup a fossil clone that can be
accessed, rather
Thus said Martin Gagnon on Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:50:40 -0400:
Work fine now.. sorry for the noise..
Speaking of noise, time to add a little more (because my original email
wasn't quite long enough).
The new options that I've added are not yet fully documented in the
usage/help (not having
12 matches
Mail list logo
