Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned files.

2016-09-11 Thread Scott Robison
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Adam Jensen wrote: > On 09/11/2016 01:54 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > On Sep 11, 2016 18:18, "Adam Jensen" > > wrote: > [snip] > >> ''' > >> 5.4 Unversioned File Sync > >> > >> "Unversioned files"

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned files.

2016-09-11 Thread Scott Robison
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Adam Jensen wrote: > On 09/11/2016 04:42 PM, Scott Robison wrote: > > I may not be understanding you, but from my point of view, it already > > does what you want by supporting versioned files that you simply never > > change. For example, you

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned files.

2016-09-11 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sep 11, 2016 21:49, "Adam Jensen" wrote: > > On 09/11/2016 01:54 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > On Sep 11, 2016 18:18, "Adam Jensen" > > wrote: > [snip] > >> ''' > >> 5.4 Unversioned File Sync > >> > >> "Unversioned files" are

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned files.

2016-09-11 Thread Adam Jensen
On 09/11/2016 04:42 PM, Scott Robison wrote: > I may not be understanding you, but from my point of view, it already > does what you want by supporting versioned files that you simply never > change. For example, you could have a repo that has a structure along > the lines of: > >

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned files.

2016-09-11 Thread Adam Jensen
On 09/11/2016 06:38 PM, Scott Robison wrote: > Of course, adding differentiation and specialization increases > complexity, so it can be a tricky balancing act. We, as a species, have already gone down that rabbit hole. ___ fossil-users mailing list

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned files.

2016-09-11 Thread Adam Jensen
On 09/11/2016 05:30 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > And i would argue against it as falling well out of scope for an SCM ;) I'm okay with that. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned files.

2016-09-11 Thread Adam Jensen
On 09/11/2016 05:41 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Sep 10, 2016 19:31, "Adam Jensen" > wrote: >> 1. What is the largest size of any single file that can be checked into >> a repository? > > effectively limited by system memory: fossil needs approx. 2-3x

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned files.

2016-09-11 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sep 11, 2016 18:18, "Adam Jensen" wrote: > > On 09/11/2016 05:41 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > On Sep 10, 2016 19:31, "Adam Jensen" > > wrote: > >> 1. What is the largest size of any single file that can be checked into > >> a

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned files.

2016-09-11 Thread Adam Jensen
On 09/11/2016 01:54 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Sep 11, 2016 18:18, "Adam Jensen" > wrote: [snip] >> ''' >> 5.4 Unversioned File Sync >> >> "Unversioned files" are files held in the repository where only the most >> recent version of the file is kept

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned files.

2016-09-11 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sep 10, 2016 19:31, "Adam Jensen" wrote: > 1. What is the largest size of any single file that can be checked into > a repository? effectively limited by system memory: fossil needs approx. 2-3x the file's size (concurrently in RAM) to create/apply deltas. > 2. How well