On 5 April 2011 03:02, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
A lot of the projects that Wikimedia is investing in today are small and
focused on particular needs of the Wikimedia Foundation, not the Wikimedia
community. One example might be an article feedback tool that's largely
focused on
2011/4/5 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
On 5 April 2011 03:02, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
A lot of the projects that Wikimedia is investing in today are small and
focused on particular needs of the Wikimedia Foundation, not the Wikimedia
community. One example might be an article
On 5 April 2011 03:02, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Another example might be an UploadWizard that is focused on
ensuring that Wikimedia fulfills its Multimedia grant requirements rather
than actually being fully developed and ready for use by Wikimedia Commons.
These examples are off
On 5 April 2011 09:48, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
2011/4/5 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
Article rating has been a wanted feature for *years*.
... And in the Hungarian Wikipedia it was even implemented quite a
long time ago. If i recall correctly, at some point i
David Gerard wrote:
On 5 April 2011 03:02, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Another example might be an UploadWizard that is focused on
ensuring that Wikimedia fulfills its Multimedia grant requirements rather
than actually being fully developed and ready for use by Wikimedia Commons.
David Gerard wrote:
On 5 April 2011 09:48, Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
2011/4/5 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
Article rating has been a wanted feature for *years*.
... And in the Hungarian Wikipedia it was even implemented quite a
long time ago. If i recall
2011/4/5 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
What I see is grants supplying money to get initiatives that have been
long-wanted happening. The near-impossibility of getting even quite
simple things through a bureaucratic kudzu-choked community process
has been noted on this list *many* times.
To
On 5 April 2011 09:40, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
*cough* From 2005:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:David_Gerard/1.0
Magnus put together a quick version, but Brion didn't like the code
and it never happened. However, mine is just one such proposal.
Article rating has been a
On 5 April 2011 22:20, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 April 2011 09:40, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
Article rating has been a wanted feature for *years*.
What I'd like to see is article rating being more widespread. But
having a grant push it through is *just fine*, because it
On 4/5/2011 2:37 PM, David Gerard wrote:
Classic is largely unmaintained, since no-one seems to want to bother
to maintain it.
To coin a phrase, Monobook is the new Classic. Maybe we should rename
Classic to Legacy? That might communicate the implications a bit better
to anyone considering it.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:22 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
On 5 April 2011 03:02, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Another example might be an UploadWizard that is focused on
ensuring that Wikimedia fulfills its Multimedia grant requirements rather
than
Jan Kucera (Kozuch) wrote:
why is the Foundation so passive??? I have been since almost 5 years with
various Wikimedia projects and I can really see NO PROGRESS from the side of
the Foundation but more employees, 2 new blogs, new Vector skin and maybe
MediaWiki performance tweaks. My
On 18/03/11 23:28, Jan Kucera (Kozuch) wrote:
Hi there,
why is the Foundation so passive??? I have been since almost 5 years
with various Wikimedia projects and I can really see NO PROGRESS from
the side of the Foundation but more employees, 2 new blogs, new
Vector skin and maybe MediaWiki
Hi there,
why is the Foundation so passive??? I have been since almost 5 years with
various Wikimedia projects and I can really see NO PROGRESS from the side of
the Foundation but more employees, 2 new blogs, new Vector skin and maybe
MediaWiki performance tweaks. My participation declined
Yes, you're right.
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Jan Kucera (Kozuch) garba...@seznam.czwrote:
Hi there,
why is the Foundation so passive??? I have been since almost 5 years with
various Wikimedia projects and I can really see NO PROGRESS from the side of
the Foundation but more
15 matches
Mail list logo
