On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
I think OPW is great. Having it ran by GNOME is great as well. Lack of
status update is bad. Having OPW funds under the same legal entity is
IMO questionable. I think it should be a separate legal entity. For as
it already
On 08/07/2014 12:06 AM, Mathieu Duponchelle wrote:
Women do represent a pretty significant portion of the general
public, no? I think for men by men probably doesn't meet the
general public qualifier there.
Standalone OPW is different from from men by men, I'm afraid I don't
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Let's not conflate whether or not OPW has anything to do with the mission
statement or not; if there was a problem with alignment to the mission
statement I would have expected that to be brought up quite some time ago,
On 08/07/2014 09:50 AM, Pascal Terjan wrote:
The discussion is not about the absence of OPW, but about not
providing the service of managing OPW for other organisations.
I haven't seen anyone saying GNOME shouldn'tparticipate in OPW.
Let me try to explain this another way...
A couple of
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Mathieu Duponchelle mduponchel...@gmail.com
wrote:
It seems I'm far from being the only one to think OPW should be abstracted
away from GNOME. The subject of this thread clearly is GNOME's mission
statement, and I'm interested in further discussion / opinions
GSoC is also outside of the mission statement
Why do you mention that? GSoC is organized by Google, not by GNOME.
I think the discussion should focus on what is relevant
I agree, but as I just said the subject of the thread is GNOME's mission
statement, not financial and administrative
hi meg,
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014, at 11:18, meg ford wrote:
I don't think it's relevant. GSoC is also outside of the mission
statement,
though as I said before I think there are allusions to outreach in the
Charter. I think the discussion should focus on what is relevant, which
is
how the
Hi Ryan,
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Ryan Lortie de...@desrt.ca wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014, at 11:18, meg ford wrote:
I don't think it's relevant. GSoC is also outside of the mission
statement,
though as I said before I think there are allusions to outreach in the
Charter. I think
On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 18:34 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
Second, OPW has been beneficial for GNOME. It has raised our profile
and further established our role as leaders in the Free Software
world. Our sponsors are enthusiastic about OPW (conversely, moving OPW
out of GNOME would give them one less
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
Do you understand that the many -isms that negatively impact GNOME and
open
On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 14:24 -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
Do you
Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote:
Second, OPW has been beneficial for GNOME. It has raised our profile
and further established our role as leaders in the Free Software
world. Our sponsors are enthusiastic about OPW (conversely, moving OPW
out of GNOME would give them one less reason to
On 08/07/2014 03:02 PM, Allan Day wrote:
While the interpretation isn't quite right, that blog post talks about
GNOME and does so positively. It's giving us good exposure.
Maybe GNOME's logo should appear under sponsors on gnome.org/opw too.
~m
On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 15:13 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
On 08/07/2014 03:02 PM, Allan Day wrote:
While the interpretation isn't quite right, that blog post talks about
GNOME and does so positively. It's giving us good exposure.
Maybe GNOME's logo should appear under sponsors on
On 08/07/2014 03:23 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Ditto for the flyer at https://wiki.gnome.org/OutreachProgramForWomen as
well as the similarly worded origins section.
I'm happy to redesign the poster as needed. If anybody wants to help me
in reviewing the edits, let me know off-list.
~m
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
1. Please get yourself a mailer that doesn't mangle Máirín's name, there
are
16 matches
Mail list logo
