but traffic does not
dump out the other side.
I'm 99.9% sure I'm missing something basic but I don't have a good
configuration example for this setup.
Any help or insight would be GREATLY appreciated! Thanks in advance!
-brad fleming
--
Brad Fleming
Network Engineer
Kansas Research
to share? It would be greatly appreciated!
Brad Fleming
On Apr 14, 2009, at 8:49 PM, David Ball wrote:
Foundry has a slightly different take on making a service
'transparent' (at least from what I was used to with JNPR). To make
it transparent, you change the tag-type to something that won't
We just saw this on one of our NetIron XMR 4000 devices:
Mar 11 19:03:00:N:System: Module 1 powered on
Mar 11 19:02:59:N:System: Module 1 powered off
Mar 11 19:02:59:I:System: Interface ethernet 1/20, state down -
unspecified
Mar 11 19:02:59:I:System: Interface ethernet 1/19, state down -
any of your experiences and for any feedback or
insights.
--
Brad Fleming
On Mar 11, 2010, at 8:44 PM, Brad Fleming wrote:
We just saw this on one of our NetIron XMR 4000 devices:
Mar 11 19:03:00:N:System: Module 1 powered on
Mar 11 19:02:59:N:System: Module 1 powered off
Mar 11 19:02:59
.
I hope this helps and if you'd like a dump of our ticket please let
me know and I'll forward it unicast. :D
--
Brad Fleming
On Mar 27, 2010, at 2:05 AM, Jan Pedersen wrote:
We are using 3rd parts optics to 95 % in our NetIrons, and have had
quite a few Resets due to TM Errors. But we don’t
We're running IronWare 4.0.0.1d on NetIron XMRs. Is it possible to tie
a local VE into a VPLS without looping ports together?
Based upon the ConfigGuide, I don't think its possible without looping
ports but I thought I'd ask... figure some of you all have been down
this road and know the
I don't believe there's a way to reconfigure the BigIron; however,
you'll likely get even load balancing if you can create two separate
sessions / flows. Is that possible in your situation?
On Oct 29, 2010, at 3:40 AM, Dana wrote:
Hi all,
I have noticed a little problem with our LAG
Hello all,
Has anyone ever used the upgrade scripting features on a NetIron XMR?
ie: copy tftp system 1.1.1.1 blah.txt
Is there any special syntax required? Any oddities with line break
types or other gotchas?
Can you only issue copy commands or can the script perform
housekeeping duties
Is it possible to mirror outbound / egress packets via ACL on an XMR
with 5.1.00b?
I'm guessing not since I see no outbound ACL reference in the config
guide and some quick testing in the lab yields unfavorable results.
Thought I'd hit this mailing list in case I'm missing something
Another one to take a look toward is:
ip rate-limit arp policy-name policy name
You can find it on page 706 (of 2718) in the 5.1.00 Config Guide.
And if you're really concerned abut broadcast traffic, an L2 ACL on
ingress ports with rate-limiters can be very effective with little
effort.
Does anyone have a Life of a Packet diagram or document for traffic
flowing through the NetIron XMR/MLX series gear? I'd like something
that shows processing order of different pieces of the hardware and
software in a format that can be distributed to Tier 2 and Tier 3
admins engineers.
...@xmission.com]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 9:47 AM
To: 'Brad Fleming'; 'foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net'
Subject: RE: [f-nsp] Life of a Packet in NetIron Series Diagram?
https://www.gosavo.com/brocade/Search/Search.aspx?criteria=xmr+mlx+training
Training I has a bunch of packet flow diagrams information
If you have an MLXe you could buy the 8x10G Cards, they will have that
feature.
I believe the new 24x1Gbps card also has these counters(?). I don't
have one to confirm though.
___
foundry-nsp mailing list
foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net
Message-
From: foundry-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:foundry-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
] On Behalf Of Brad Fleming
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 12:42 PM
To: foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [f-nsp] TE for the same VLL peers
Hello all,
If you have two VLLs both pointed at the same
Does anyone have a suggestion on 23-to-19 inch rack adaptors that work
particularly well with the MLX/XMR series of gear? The only ones I have
experience with are way too flimsy for this application and it seems there's
tons to choose from. Any suggestions (other than buy a new rack) would be
General heads up: All 23 of the switch fabs have been spoken for at this time.
Thanks for helping us get them moved quickly! :D
-brad
On Aug 1, 2011, at 11:33 AM, Brad Fleming wrote:
All,
We recently upgraded all of our XMR 4000 nodes with high-capacity switch
fabric modules. We are now
Specifically, are you trying to get 2Mil routes into the BGP protocol table,
2Mil routes into the general IP route table, or 2Mil routes into the FIB?
On Oct 5, 2011, at 3:01 PM, Anand Valmiki wrote:
You should be able to get 2 Million routes in the BGP table. I have two BGP
peers sending
On Jun 13, 2012, at 12:08 PM, Brian Taylor wrote:
We have an MLX that has two devices that send a ping every second to their
gateway as an heartbeat.
Both of these are directly plugged in to copper Gigabit ports on separate
ni-mlx-20-port-1g-copper modules.
They are untagged into the same
On Feb 27, 2013, at 4:04 PM, Alex HM alex.hm.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I think this is a rather hot topic at the moment.
The Internet table keeps growing at a steady pace, more and more networks
practice prefixes disaggregation, especially smaller ISPs. I do not know what
are they
Sure!
On Mar 27, 2013, at 1:36 AM, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr yous...@720.fr wrote:
Hi Brad,
Thank you for the feedback, I will take a look at this.
Can I contact you privatly to discuss this ?
Best regards.
Y.
Le 26 mars 2013 à 19:17, Brad Fleming bdfle...@gmail.com a écrit
Anyone on the list have experience running IronWare 5.4.00c on XMR4000s with
high capacity switch fabs, 1x20G, and 4x10G line cards? We're planning software
updates for the summer and that looks like a reasonably deep release but it's
only been on the street for about 6 weeks. Just wondering if
I did this exact process late last week on our 14 XMRs. We moved from 5.1.00b
to 5.4.00d. I've uploaded new code a few hours early on our previous 5-6
software updates and never had an issue. This time I made it through the first
two nodes with no problems by on the 3rd the node became
Any chance someone on the list knows if / when the XMR or MLXe series will be
able to do reverse path checks on VE interfaces?___
foundry-nsp mailing list
foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
29, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Brad Fleming bdfle...@gmail.com wrote:
Any chance someone on the list knows if / when the XMR or MLXe series will
be able to do reverse path checks on VE interfaces?
___
foundry-nsp mailing list
foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net
I'm having an issue trying to match traffic based on IP source of a multicast
group. Traffic is flowing through a VE interface if that makes any difference.
I know the traffic is actually moving because I'm watching the video broadcast
on my laptop right now via VLC. I'm also seeing traffic
errors like this suggest replacing the hardware?
Frank
From: foundry-nsp [mailto:foundry-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Brad Fleming
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 3:10 PM
To: Josh Galvez
Cc: foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [f-nsp] MLX throughput issues
Over the years we’ve seen odd issues where one of the switch-fabric-links will
“wigout” and some of the data moving between cards will get corrupted. When
this happens we power cycle each switch fab one at a time using this process:
1) Shutdown SFM #3
2) Wait 1 minute
3) Power SFM #3 on again
4)
27 matches
Mail list logo
