Hi there,
What is actually the idea about further developments of the IDE, with
my particular interest in Darwin.
My impression is that the FPIDE is winx and linux, but not *bsd and not
much further development.
Then there is lazarus with more drive, but not much *bsd stuff there
too and
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Karl-Michael Schindler wrote:
Hi there,
What is actually the idea about further developments of the IDE, with
my particular interest in Darwin.
My impression is that the FPIDE is winx and linux, but not *bsd and not
much further development.
Then there is lazarus with
Karl-Michael Schindler wrote:
Hi there,
What is actually the idea about further developments of the IDE, with my
particular interest in Darwin.
My impression is that the FPIDE is winx and linux, but not *bsd and not
much further development.
Then there is lazarus with more drive, but not much
On 5 feb 2004, at 17:02, Karl-Michael Schindler wrote:
I checked out fpc freshly, since I thought I broke it. But the same
problem shows up again:
michael-pbook-ep3:~/Develop/fpc/compiler michael$ make cycle
make: Fatal:: Command not found
make: Fatal:: Command not found
make: Fatal:: Command
On 5 feb 2004, at 14:10, Karl-Michael Schindler wrote:
What is actually the idea about further developments of the IDE, with
my particular interest in Darwin.
My impression is that the FPIDE is winx and linux, but not *bsd and
not much further development.
The problem is that the two people who
At 16:47 5-2-2004, Karl-Michael Schindler wrote:
I tried the IDE and the problem was that it needs fvision, which didn't
compile since it contains 386 assembler. Correct me if I am wrong.
80's/90's interface wouldn't be to bad, since my smaller kids may use
Turbopascal at school.
I tried
Thanks Jonas
indeed my PATH was broken. After fixing I went further to compile some
more stuff.
sockets:
After copying the following files from rtl/freebsd to rtl/darwin,
sockets (needed for fcl) compiled:
sysnr.inc
unixsock.inc
packages:
compiled well, most extra packages are still missing
