Re: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-22 Thread L
We've looked at the people on the mailing list many times, but we've never seen people sticking out their neck and actually doing something along these lines. It takes long-range commitment, which is probably what scares many people off... I've volunteered to help, but I think there are too

Re: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-22 Thread L
We've looked at the people on the mailing list many times, but we've never seen people sticking out their neck and actually doing something along these lines. I've looked at people in charge many times, but I've never seen those in charge sticking their head out telling me directly,

Re: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-22 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, L wrote: We've looked at the people on the mailing list many times, but we've never seen people sticking out their neck and actually doing something along these lines. It takes long-range commitment, which is probably what scares many people off... You do have to have

Re: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-22 Thread Daniël Mantione
Op Wed, 21 Dec 2005, schreef L: We've looked at the people on the mailing list many times, but we've never seen people sticking out their neck and actually doing something along these lines. I've looked at people in charge many times, but I've never seen those in charge

Re: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-19 Thread L
under the documents (who wouldn't?). The author, for one :-) The commenting system puts extra load on the server which I don't want. Amazon.com has a patent on one click shopping, I believe. I think I know why. Well, with the FindPart function, back 7 months ago.. I found an error in the

Re: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-19 Thread Vincent Snijders
L wrote: under the documents (who wouldn't?). The author, for one :-) The commenting system puts extra load on the server which I don't want. Amazon.com has a patent on one click shopping, I believe. I think I know why. Well, with the FindPart function, back 7 months ago.. I found an

Re: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-19 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005, L wrote: under the documents (who wouldn't?). The author, for one :-) The commenting system puts extra load on the server which I don't want. Amazon.com has a patent on one click shopping, I believe. I think I know why. Well, with the FindPart function, back 7

Re: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-19 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On 12/19/05, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Amazon is a company which can add servers at will. The FPC servers are paid out of our own pockets, so things as 'load' etc. form a big restriction. By the way I think this is missing a lot on Free Pascal. You guys could start calling

Re: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-19 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On 12/19/05, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's not so much the 'hard' that is the problem. As with the PR thing: The core developers really don't have time for this. It takes a lot of effort: prepare, go there (costs again money), follow- up. You need some kind of legal entity

Re: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-19 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 19 dec 2005, at 14:28, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: * Send a propolsal for IBM to pay propaganda for you as part of the Linux on Power project http://www.linuxonpower.com/ That already happened, and thanks to that we now have a ppc64 version of the compiler. Jonas

Re: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-16 Thread L505
Did you miss something? On the FPC homepage: - Click on-line documentation - Click documentation table of contents with comments - Click Add a comment I think I finally figured out your little comment system for the units generated with FPDOC that I seemed to magically find today:

Re: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-16 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, L505 wrote: Did you miss something? On the FPC homepage: - Click on-line documentation - Click documentation table of contents with comments - Click Add a comment I think I finally figured out your little comment system for the units generated with FPDOC that I

Re: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-04 Thread Mark de Wever
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 06:13:30PM +0100, Michalis Kamburelis wrote: Mark de Wever wrote: Hi all, I like to put a lot of comment in the source and I would like fpdoc to output this comment into the output files. I wrote a small patch to do this with types, it puts all the comment in front

Re: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-04 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005, L505 wrote: Florian Klaempfl schrieb: Why ;)? Indeed, if you want generated docs from comments, better use pasdoc. the source scanner used by fpDoc supports reading of comments for quite some time; but as I already told you (or was it Mattias?), the final

Re: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-04 Thread Daniël Mantione
Op Sun, 4 Dec 2005, schreef L505: Please make sure that the fpdoc commenting logic is clearly separated from the CGI logic. This way your changes can maybe be incorporates in the FPC sources and website. Yup that's what I planned on doing to modularize development.. A separate

Re: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-04 Thread Mark de Wever
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 12:11:20AM +0100, Sebastian Günther wrote: Florian Klaempfl schrieb: Why ;)? Indeed, if you want generated docs from comments, better use pasdoc. the source scanner used by fpDoc supports reading of comments for quite some time; but as I already told you (or was

Re: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-04 Thread Daniël Mantione
Op Sun, 4 Dec 2005, schreef L505: Did you miss something? On the FPC homepage: - Click on-line documentation - Click documentation table of contents with comments - Click Add a comment I think we went over this before. I was talking about the FPDOC online reference documents,

[fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-03 Thread Mark de Wever
Hi all, I like to put a lot of comment in the source and I would like fpdoc to output this comment into the output files. I wrote a small patch to do this with types, it puts all the comment in front of a type declaration into the output html as section Comment text. Since I'm not really

Re: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-03 Thread Michalis Kamburelis
Mark de Wever wrote: Hi all, I like to put a lot of comment in the source and I would like fpdoc to output this comment into the output files. I wrote a small patch to do this with types, it puts all the comment in front of a type declaration into the output html as section Comment text.

Re: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-03 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Michalis Kamburelis wrote: Mark de Wever wrote: Hi all, I like to put a lot of comment in the source and I would like fpdoc to output this comment into the output files. I wrote a small patch to do this with types, it puts all the comment in front of a type declaration into the output

Re: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-03 Thread Sebastian Günther
Florian Klaempfl schrieb: Why ;)? Indeed, if you want generated docs from comments, better use pasdoc. the source scanner used by fpDoc supports reading of comments for quite some time; but as I already told you (or was it Mattias?), the final support in fpDoc is still missing. If there is

Re: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-03 Thread L505
Florian Klaempfl schrieb: Why ;)? Indeed, if you want generated docs from comments, better use pasdoc. the source scanner used by fpDoc supports reading of comments for quite some time; but as I already told you (or was it Mattias?), the final support in fpDoc is still missing. If

RE: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-03 Thread peter green
The way to get users do more work in writing documentation, is to have a comment system right up live on the website. Even the PHP manual does this ;-) yeah the accuracy of said information leaves a LOT to be desired though imo if this is done someone needs to be resposible for looking at

Re: [fpc-devel] [RFC] fpdoc output comment from the source

2005-12-03 Thread L505
The way to get users do more work in writing documentation, is to have a comment system right up live on the website. Even the PHP manual does this ;-) yeah the accuracy of said information leaves a LOT to be desired though imo if this is done someone needs to be resposible for