FPC has great amounts of compatibility with Borland Delphi. Unfortunately,
according to the FPC docs, it only supports Delphi compatibility until Delphi
4.
The object pascal enhancement on the next Delphi release is still not supported
by FPC.
Since now Delphi has grown to Delphi 9 (2005)
FPC has great amounts of compatibility with Borland Delphi. Unfortunately,
according to the FPC docs, it only supports Delphi compatibility until Delphi
4.
The object pascal enhancement on the next Delphi release is still not
supported
by FPC.
Since now Delphi has grown to Delphi 9
Name one that really enables you to do something that you couldn't do
otherwise.
Actually... none. :)
If you want portability, simply don't use D2005 syntax.
Hmmm... very nice advice. :)
Write it in D7 and compile it everywhere.
To my knowledge there are no plans for post-D7 support. The
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 27.05.2005, 15:36 +0700 schrieb Bisma Jayadi:
Name one that really enables you to do something that you couldn't do
otherwise.
Actually... none. :)
If you want portability, simply don't use D2005 syntax.
Hmmm... very nice advice. :)
Write it in D7 and compile
So, may I conclude that FPC is targetting D7 language compatibility? That's
sound fair enough to me, and -thanks God- I can live with that. :)
Roughly yes. That is the goal of the 2.0.x branch, languagewise.
Is the D7 compatibility has been reached fully or partially or still under
On Fri, 27 May 2005, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Hi,
I ran fpdoc generated html files through a html validator and it didn't like
the ISO8859-1 encoding. Attached patch changes references to ISO8859-1
encoding to ISO-8859-1.
Thanks. Applied.
I also got errors like:
Error: element NOBR
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2005, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Hi,
I ran fpdoc generated html files through a html validator and it
didn't like the ISO8859-1 encoding. Attached patch changes references
to ISO8859-1 encoding to ISO-8859-1.
Thanks. Applied.
I also got errors
On Fri, 27 May 2005, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2005, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Hi,
I ran fpdoc generated html files through a html validator and it didn't
like the ISO8859-1 encoding. Attached patch changes references to
ISO8859-1 encoding to
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2005, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2005, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Hi,
I ran fpdoc generated html files through a html validator and it
didn't like the ISO8859-1 encoding. Attached patch changes
references
From: Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2005, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2005, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Hi,
I ran fpdoc generated html files through a html
Problem:
Some units require the cthreads unit, but only under linux and it must be
added as first unit to the main source.
Questions:
Will the cthreads unit will be added as default someday under linux ?
Or will it become obsolete by some other unit/feature?
Or will it stay this way: If you need
On Fri, 27 May 2005, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Problem:
Some units require the cthreads unit, but only under linux and it must be
added as first unit to the main source.
Questions:
Will the cthreads unit will be added as default someday under linux ?
No.
Or will it become obsolete by
12 matches
Mail list logo
