Am 01.05.2017 um 17:10 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> In our previous episode, Florian Kl?mpfl said:
>>> URL
>>> 'https://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/branches/fixes_3_0':
>>
>> Just relocate the check out?
>>
>> For people using git-svn, the section 'General Case' here:
>>
In our previous episode, Florian Kl?mpfl said:
> > URL
> > 'https://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/branches/fixes_3_0':
>
> Just relocate the check out?
>
> For people using git-svn, the section 'General Case' here:
> https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitSvnSwitch should help.
I already fixed
Am 01.05.2017 um 15:16 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> In our previous episode, Marco van de Voort said:
http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/mergelogs26/backtrace.txt
>>>
>>> BTW: Could you extend your scripts to include links for the revs to ViewVC?
>>> Pattern is:
>>>
In our previous episode, Marco van de Voort said:
> > > http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/mergelogs26/backtrace.txt
> >
> > BTW: Could you extend your scripts to include links for the revs to ViewVC?
> > Pattern is:
> > https://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?view=revision=35495
>
> I tried,
In our previous episode, Florian Kl?mpfl said:
> > bugreport has been merged, but there are still backtrace related fixes
> > unmerged:
> >
> > http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/mergelogs26/backtrace.txt
>
> BTW: Could you extend your scripts to include links for the revs to ViewVC?
> Pattern is:
>
Am 01.05.2017 um 14:34 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> In our previous episode, Bernd Mueller said:
>>> Only 3.0.2 linux for i386 CPU has the problem. 64-bit is OK.
>>
>> hmm, I don't get the lineinfo on x86-64 (Ubuntu 16.04/Mate, 64-Bit).
>> armel and armhf are affected too.
>
> Please test with
01.05.2017 14:35, Bernd Mueller:
On 05/01/2017 11:36 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Only 3.0.2 linux for i386 CPU has the problem. 64-bit is OK.
hmm, I don't get the lineinfo on x86-64 (Ubuntu 16.04/Mate, 64-Bit).
armel and armhf are affected too.
Personally, for now I'll stick to 2.6.4 --
On 05/01/2017 11:36 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Only 3.0.2 linux for i386 CPU has the problem. 64-bit is OK.
hmm, I don't get the lineinfo on x86-64 (Ubuntu 16.04/Mate, 64-Bit).
armel and armhf are affected too.
Regards, Bernd.
___
fpc-devel
Am 01.05.2017 um 11:36 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
>
>
> On Mon, 1 May 2017, Nikolai Zhubr wrote:
>
>> 01.05.2017 11:46, Florian Klämpfl:
>> [...]
And I'm still getting just an address anyway...
>>>
>>>
>>> 3.0.x is broken in this regard (stack back trace on x86-64 elf targets),
>> see
On Mon, 1 May 2017, Nikolai Zhubr wrote:
01.05.2017 11:46, Florian Klämpfl:
[...]
And I'm still getting just an address anyway...
3.0.x is broken in this regard (stack back trace on x86-64 elf targets),
see other threads on the
fpc mailing lists regarding this. This is why we discussing
01.05.2017 11:46, Florian Klämpfl:
[...]
And I'm still getting just an address anyway...
3.0.x is broken in this regard (stack back trace on x86-64 elf targets), see
other threads on the
fpc mailing lists regarding this. This is why we discussing a quick as
possibile 3.0.4 release.
Ah,
Am 01.05.2017 um 10:40 schrieb Nikolai Zhubr:
> 01.05.2017 11:21, Michael Van Canneyt:
> [...]
>> No, but the units that we distribute do not have debug information
>> included.
>> So if the error is in the RTL, then there is no debug information.
>
> Ok, right, but then I suppose it should show
01.05.2017 11:21, Michael Van Canneyt:
[...]
No, but the units that we distribute do not have debug information
included.
So if the error is in the RTL, then there is no debug information.
Ok, right, but then I suppose it should show line number as soon as the
example is modified like this:
On Mon, 1 May 2017, Nikolai Zhubr wrote:
Hello all,
I'm having some trouble to get BacktraceStrFunc to find line numbers.
This is with fpc 3.0.0 on linux x86_64 (Centos 7 if it matters).
If I compile the following example with
#fpc -gl tt.pas
I only get this output:
Started...
Exception:
Hello all,
I'm having some trouble to get BacktraceStrFunc to find line numbers.
This is with fpc 3.0.0 on linux x86_64 (Centos 7 if it matters).
If I compile the following example with
#fpc -gl tt.pas
I only get this output:
Started...
Exception: $00455540
Done.
Evidently line
15 matches
Mail list logo
