On 11/4/2018 7:26 PM, Ben Grasset wrote:
I'm not young. You're making all kinds of assumptions here. TP7 /is
/generally speaking, irrelevant in the fast majority of cases nowadays.
Talking about making assumptions!
The overall point is just that I believe it is /highly/ reasonable to
suggest
I accidentally replied to this one via the main thread. It's my most recent
message before this.
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 9:19 AM Alexander Grotewohl wrote:
> Not to mention the users who pick up FPC and have to port what they've
> previously learned. That information is useful even if the code
I just strongly disagree that there's much merit or reality to the overall
concept people keep floating here that FPC's *actual *user base consists
largely of a magical non-stop stream of 50+ year olds who have randomly
decided out of the blue to "pick up Pascal again" and re-live the whimsical
I honestly have no idea. It's not an issue I've ever encountered, as I've
literally never built Lazarus with a toolchain that wasn't 64 bit. It would
seem to be the case though that it is indeed very possible (at some
level/point) for it to consume that much memory.
It's worth noting I guess that
It may really truly be the case that you somehow have a codebase that
you're still in the process of porting, but in all honesty *just *setting
{$mode TP} and nothing else will generally speaking get you 90% of the way
there most of the time, if not all the way.
FPC in TP mode has been able to
I'm not young. You're making all kinds of assumptions here. TP7 *is *generally
speaking, irrelevant in the fast majority of cases nowadays. FPC is 1000x
more advanced in every conceivable way than any version of Turbo Pascal
ever was. There is nothing "interesting" about TP from a current
On 11/4/2018 5:24 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
Am So., 4. Nov. 2018, 20:36 hat Gennady Agranov
mailto:gennadyagra...@gmail.com>> geschrieben:
On 11/4/2018 11:24 AM, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
Am So., 4. Nov. 2018, 12:23 hat Schindler Karl-Michael
Am So., 4. Nov. 2018, 20:36 hat Gennady Agranov
geschrieben:
> On 11/4/2018 11:24 AM, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
>
> Am So., 4. Nov. 2018, 12:23 hat Schindler Karl-Michael <
> karl-michael.schind...@web.de> geschrieben:
>
>>
>>
>> > Am 04.11.2018 um 12:00 schrieb Ben Grasset :
>> >
>> >
On 11/4/2018 4:41 AM, wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
On 11/3/18 7:09 PM, Ben Grasset wrote:
(The same could be said about the various other wildly outdated bits of
information on the overall site and the fact that it gives
now-hugely-irrelevant topics like "porting from TP7" such precedence,
On 11/4/2018 11:24 AM, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
Am So., 4. Nov. 2018, 12:23 hat Schindler Karl-Michael
mailto:karl-michael.schind...@web.de>>
geschrieben:
> Am 04.11.2018 um 12:00 schrieb Ben Grasset mailto:operato...@gmail.com>>:
>
> From: Ben Grasset
I made a quick modification today and it seems doable to add these devices
without much change. Compared the code generated for a basic test between
modified FPC and avr-gcc with atmega4808 updated from latest update pack
and the binaries seem to match quite well. A bit more effort is required
Am 25.10.2018 um 20:13 schrieb Florian Klämpfl:
In case somebody wonders: as I started years ago on tls-based threadvars, I
decided first to work on this one first and
try to bring this code into a commitable state.
___
fpc-devel maillist -
Am So., 4. Nov. 2018, 12:23 hat Schindler Karl-Michael <
karl-michael.schind...@web.de> geschrieben:
>
>
> > Am 04.11.2018 um 12:00 schrieb Ben Grasset :
> >
> > From: Ben Grasset
> > To: FPC-Devel users discussions
> > Subject: Re: Array assignment operator
> > Message-ID: <
>
Not to mention the users who pick up FPC and have to port what they've
previously learned. That information is useful even if the code isn't
already written.
On 11/4/2018 7:41 AM, wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
On 11/3/18 7:09 PM, Ben Grasset wrote:
(The same could be said about the various
On 11/3/18 7:09 PM, Ben Grasset wrote:
(The same could be said about the various other wildly outdated bits of
information on the overall site and the fact that it gives
now-hugely-irrelevant topics like "porting from TP7" such precedence, but
that's a different issue.)
porting from TP/BP 6/7
> Am 04.11.2018 um 12:00 schrieb Ben Grasset :
>
> From: Ben Grasset
> To: FPC-Devel users discussions
> Subject: Re: Array assignment operator
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 4:44 PM Gennady Agranov
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Leaving
On 04/11/18 00:09, Ben Grasset wrote:
s just one example, I've seen more than one instance of people on the
Lazarus forums posting threads asking about how they can work around
out-of-memory errors while building Lazarus
Where does the compiler need more than 1.5GB of VM space while building
17 matches
Mail list logo
