On Sun, 30 Apr 2023, Bernd Oppolzer via fpc-other wrote:
Am 29.04.2023 um 19:48 schrieb geneb via fpc-other:
On Sat, 29 Apr 2023, Bernd Oppolzer via fpc-other wrote:
This may be slightly off-topic, but I can tell you some facts about my
Stanford Pascal compiler,
which runs
- native on z
Bernd Oppolzer via fpc-other wrote:
This may be slightly off-topic, but I can tell you some facts about my
Stanford Pascal compiler,
which runs
- native on z Mainframe machines (which may count as a RISC machine,
given the instruction set used)
- emulated by Hercules, which is a emulator of
Am 29.04.2023 um 19:48 schrieb geneb via fpc-other:
On Sat, 29 Apr 2023, Bernd Oppolzer via fpc-other wrote:
This may be slightly off-topic, but I can tell you some facts about
my Stanford Pascal compiler,
which runs
- native on z Mainframe machines (which may count as a RISC machine,
On Sat, 29 Apr 2023, Bernd Oppolzer via fpc-other wrote:
This may be slightly off-topic, but I can tell you some facts about my
Stanford Pascal compiler,
which runs
- native on z Mainframe machines (which may count as a RISC machine,
given the instruction set used)
- emulated by Hercules,
On the same machine:
PASCAL1 compiled with Stanford Pascal, running on the Hercules emulator:
pp pascal1
EXEC PASCAL PASCAL1
STATE PASCAL1 PASCAL A
EXEC PASCOMP PASCAL1
STANFORD PASCAL COMPILER, OPPOLZER VERSION OF 2023.03
Compiler Summary
No Errors, no
This may be slightly off-topic, but I can tell you some facts about my
Stanford Pascal compiler,
which runs
- native on z Mainframe machines (which may count as a RISC machine,
given the instruction set used)
- emulated by Hercules, which is a emulator of z Mainframes
- by emulating P-Code,
Out of curiosity — has anybody compared the speed of
1. interpreting a parsed syntax tree, versus
2. interpreting byte code, versus
3. interpreting a RISC CPU ?
Regards,
Adriaan van Os
___
fpc-other maillist - fpc-other@lists.freepascal.org
