Sent from my iPhone
On 21 Feb 2010, at 19:37, JoshyFun joshy...@gmail.com wrote:
z := iff(a=b,1,2);
But to me it looks awful and a bit of c-ism
No, that is a VB-ism. A C-ism would be:
z = (a==b ? 1 : 2);
Which I fo tend to use myself in c# as it is a lot more convenient in
some cases.
Can someone please let me know where i need to put the complier
ption -WB0040 to solve the 64 bit debug issue in lazarus ?
- Original Message -
From: fpc-pascal-requ...@lists.freepascal.org
To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 10:00 PM
Subject:
Justin Smyth wrote:
Can someone please let me know where i need to put the complier
ption -WB0040 to solve the 64 bit debug issue in lazarus ?
Project Compiler Options Other tab. Enter you extra compiler options in
the memo box.
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
It also proves that such solution external to the language is possible. That
weakens the case for a language feature
My point exactly! The language doesn't need such a feature because your
editor of choice should be able to do that,
Marco van de Voort wrote:
IMHO Prism is not even Delphi. Just recycling of the brand.
Laying cards on the proverbial table, I don't think it was ever intended
to be Delphi. RemObjects developed the compiler completely outside of
Delphi for a number of years before the technology was
The syntax that Prism uses is a lot cleaner in many respects - especially
removing the procedure/function conundrum and using instead method.
However, in other ways it is horrible and so I can also see why it is not
something worth discussing further.
Matt,
I am no Prism fan (I prefer native
On 22 Feb 2010, at 14:35, Anthony Walter wrote:
The syntax that Prism uses is a lot cleaner in many respects -
especially
removing the procedure/function conundrum and using instead
method.
However, in other ways it is horrible and so I can also see why it
is not
something worth
Jonas Maebe wrote:
Maybe this discussion could be moved to the fpc-other list? It's not
really directly applicable to FPC anymore.
Indeed, which is why I said [..] I can also see why it is not something
worth discussing further. I guess if someone was committing to
developing the compiler
In our previous episode, Matt Emson said:
It also proves that such solution external to the language is possible.
That
weakens the case for a language feature
My point exactly! The language doesn't need such a feature because your
editor of choice should be able to do that,
In our previous episode, Matt Emson said:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
IMHO Prism is not even Delphi. Just recycling of the brand.
Laying cards on the proverbial table, I don't think it was ever intended
to be Delphi. RemObjects developed the compiler completely outside of
Delphi for a
On Sat 20 Feb 2010, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
y := case Other of
bla : 'hello';
foo : 'bye';
baz : 'adius';
end;
What do you gain with this?
Doesn't look much different to
case Other of
bla : y := 'hello';
foo : y := 'bye';
baz : y :=
11 matches
Mail list logo
