Re: [fpc-pascal] GetTableNames in TSQLConnection / Postgresql

2012-12-18 Thread michael . vancanneyt
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, John wrote: TSchemaOption = (soPrependSchemaName,soIncludeSystemObjects); TSchemaOptions = set of TSchemaOption; Procedure GetTableNames(List : TStrings; Options : TSchemaOptions = []); I am not interested in schema information, but I can imagine some people are (the

Re: [fpc-pascal] Documentation

2012-12-18 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 18/12/12 01:25, luciano de souza wrote: But my question is: FPDoc can be used without an IDE? Yes, fpdoc is a command line tool, just the fpc (The free pascal compiler). Some get confused between the fpdoc program, and the FPDoc Editor (add-on) included within Lazarus IDE. The latter is

[fpc-pascal] Re: Documentation

2012-12-18 Thread Reinier Olislagers
On 18-12-2012 0:58, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: There are other issues with the FPDoc Editor dialog though. Off the top of my head: As I think I said last year, there's also Laz DE/Lazarus Documentation Editor. As long as we're suggesting improvements, I'd like LazDE to 1. show a formatted view

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: Documentation

2012-12-18 Thread michael . vancanneyt
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Reinier Olislagers wrote: On 18-12-2012 0:58, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: There are other issues with the FPDoc Editor dialog though. Off the top of my head: As I think I said last year, there's also Laz DE/Lazarus Documentation Editor. As long as we're suggesting

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: Documentation

2012-12-18 Thread Reinier Olislagers
On 18-12-2012 12:15, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote: On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Reinier Olislagers wrote: However, fpdoc documentation writing is a huge chore for me compared to writing in the wiki so I've decided it's more productive to get my documentation done on the wiki. A wiki is never

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: Documentation

2012-12-18 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Reinier Olislagers said: However, fpdoc documentation writing is a huge chore for me compared to writing in the wiki so I've decided it's more productive to get my documentation done on the wiki. Wiki is not versioned, not context sensitive etc. It is a perfect place

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: Documentation

2012-12-18 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 18/12/12 11:15, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote: I applied the patch, thank you ! While we are at it, here is another patch for fpdoc - lying around for a while. http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=23425 Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: Documentation

2012-12-18 Thread michael . vancanneyt
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: On 18/12/12 11:15, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote: I applied the patch, thank you ! While we are at it, here is another patch for fpdoc - lying around for a while. http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=23425 Yes, I had looked at it,

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: Documentation

2012-12-18 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said: I applied the patch, thank you ! While we are at it, here is another patch for fpdoc - lying around for a while. http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=23425 I also thought about that, but layouting the interface inheritance info is

Re: [fpc-pascal] GetTableNames in TSQLConnection / Postgresql

2012-12-18 Thread John
On 12/18/2012 07:35 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote: snip MySQL, Firebird, MS-access, sqlite simply do not have schema as Oracle has. In PostGres or MS-SQL it's optional, to my knowledge (not an expert). For the record, in Postgres, it IS optional, in the sense that you can make all

Re: [fpc-pascal] GetTableNames in TSQLConnection / Postgresql

2012-12-18 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, John wrote: On 12/18/2012 07:35 PM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote: snip MySQL, Firebird, MS-access, sqlite simply do not have schema as Oracle has. In PostGres or MS-SQL it's optional, to my knowledge (not an expert). For the record, in Postgres, it IS optional,

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: Documentation

2012-12-18 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 18/12/12 13:28, Marco van de Voort wrote: I also thought about that, but layouting the interface inheritance info is harder. It works here for Interface inheritance too. But I didn't have much code to test it with. Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit

[fpc-pascal] Submitted paszlib/zipper documentation fpdoc stripper questions

2012-12-18 Thread Reinier Olislagers
Hi all, Finally got my FPC zip/unzip unit documentation in shape and submitted it as 23508 [Patch] Zipper documentation A long time ago, I mistakenly generated an fpdoc skeleton with private members etc visible for that unit doc and started documenting. I wrote this program to get rid again of

Re: [fpc-pascal] Class procedural type

2012-12-18 Thread Ewald
Once upon a time, on 12/18/2012 06:42 AM to be precise, Sven Barth said: Am 17.12.2012 22:27 schrieb Ewald ew...@yellowcouch.org mailto:ew...@yellowcouch.org: It should not contain this hidden parameter? In that case the above code (with the intermediate pointer cast) would prove correct?

Re:[fpc-pascal] Bitpacked dynamic array support

2012-12-18 Thread denisgolovan
Hi Flávio You can use sets or TBits. Unless you mean packed arrays of byte or word, etc. In this case you just declare myvar: packed array of byte. -Flávio I meant bitpacked arrays of boolean. That's when boolean occupies only one bit in memory. Yes, I can use TBits, but unfortunately for

[fpc-pascal] Codetools and C-style constructs

2012-12-18 Thread Howard Page-Clark
Looking through some of the codetools sources makes me wonder if the codetools overlooks some C-style FPC operators. KeywordFuncLists.pas, for instance, seems not to know about , , +=, -=, *=, /=. Or are these operators are catered for elsewhere in the codetools? Howard

Re: [fpc-pascal] Codetools and C-style constructs

2012-12-18 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:13:22 + Howard Page-Clark h...@talktalk.net wrote: Looking through some of the codetools sources makes me wonder if the codetools overlooks some C-style FPC operators. KeywordFuncLists.pas, for instance, seems not to know about , , +=, -=, *=, /=. I added the

Re: [fpc-pascal] Codetools and C-style constructs

2012-12-18 Thread Howard Page-Clark
On 18/12/12 10:56, Mattias Gaertner wrote: Looking through some of the codetools sources makes me wonder if the codetools overlooks some C-style FPC operators. KeywordFuncLists.pas, for instance, seems not to know about , , +=, -=, *=, /=. I added the and . The others are assignment