On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Xiangrong Fang wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if TFPList is thread-safe or not? And if I make a
component thread-safe by using critical sections etc. Is the performance
penalty noticeable?
TFPList is not thread-safe. You need to use TThreadList if you want a
On 10/02/2014 03:02 AM, Xiangrong Fang wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if TFPList is thread-safe or not? And if I make a
component thread-safe by using critical sections etc. Is the
performance penalty noticeable?
For a class, Thread save is not that easily defined.
e.g.:
It can be fully
Flávio
Thanks so much.
Dennis
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 30/09/2014 22:05, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
It is indeed true that all units are initialized once the main code
Reinier: did you get as far as looking in Dynlibs for an error message
immediately
On 02/10/2014 12:19, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 30/09/2014 22:05, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
It is indeed true that all units are initialized once the main code
Reinier: did you get as far as looking
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 02/10/2014 12:19, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 30/09/2014 22:05, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Sven Barth said:
It is indeed true that all units are initialized once
Thanks for all the commandline suggestions , but my question is about using
Geany as the IDE , not running the compiler from the commandline. BTW : I
only use fpGUI as an example to illustrate the issue.
Using Geany as the IDE :
The FPC documentation is not correct :
1.3.38 $UNITPATH : Specify
On 02 Oct 2014, at 15:30, Brian wrote:
Thanks for all the commandline suggestions , but my question is
about using
Geany as the IDE , not running the compiler from the commandline.
Geany itself will call the compiler via the command line, so it
presumably has ways to specify additional
2014-10-02 14:16 GMT+08:00 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org:
TFPList is not thread-safe. You need to use TThreadList if you want a
thread-safe list.
Critical sections use OS calls, so there is always a performance penalty.
I think the only thread-critical operation I need is to
On 10/02/2014 08:16 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Critical sections use OS calls, so there is always a performance penalty.
That is what Futex is made for.
AFAIR, in Linux, the fpc RTL calls the pthread library mutex...
function. This library uses Futex, if the arch supports that, and uses
2014-10-02 22:09 GMT+08:00 Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de:
AFAIR, in Linux, the fpc RTL calls the pthread library mutex...
function. This library uses Futex, if the arch supports that, and uses the
plain old MUTEX system call if the arch does not support FUTEX.
I need my program to work
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Brian wrote:
Jonas , thanks very much as I now see what is happening.
FPC only searches the specific directory and not any lower level
directories. In this case the unit called is in a lower level directory.
Is there any way using Geany to add $UNITPATH directives in the
2014-10-02 22:23 GMT+08:00 Xiangrong Fang xrf...@gmail.com:
2014-10-02 22:09 GMT+08:00 Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de:
AFAIR, in Linux, the fpc RTL calls the pthread library mutex...
function. This library uses Futex, if the arch supports that, and uses the
plain old MUTEX system call
On 02 Oct 2014, at 15:59, Xiangrong Fang wrote:
I think the only thread-critical operation I need is to add item to
the
list, so I will use critical section myself, not replace TFPList with
TThreadList, for simplicity and performance reason...
It will make your program unstable (adding an
Hello,
Someone could inform me if there is an entry in bugtracker with references
to this topic?
http://www.mail-archive.com/fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org/msg31061.html
Here in FPC 2.6.4 this code compile well, without erros, warnings etc.:
TTest = class abstract(TObject)
end;
...
var
Thanks Michael.
Jonas tip allows me to see what is happening when using Geany. In the case
of fpGUI , the fpmake creates all the .ppu and .o files and places them in
directory ../i386-linux.
Using either the wildcard * or absolute name of the directory is ok . The
compiler finds (in this
In our previous episode, Brian said:
Is there any way to tell the compiler to just link existing .ppu and .o
files ?
There are three things in such case:
- compile the immutable packages with -Ur
- find actually WHY the compiler doesn't want to use the .ppu's and get to
the root of the
Marco ,
The fpGUI units were recompiled with directive -Ur
When the helloworld.pas file is compiled using Geany (with -Ur and -Va) for
some reason FPC can't find the unit (fpg_impl.ppu) called by fp_base , even
though it is present in the folder with fpb_base.
[0.058] Load from FPG_BASE
On 10/02/2014 05:35 PM, silvioprog wrote:
Hello,
Someone could inform me if there is an entry in bugtracker with
references to this topic?
This has already been fixed I believe. See
http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-devel/2014-July/033930.html
for more information.
--
Ewald
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Ewald ew...@yellowcouch.org wrote:
On 10/02/2014 05:35 PM, silvioprog wrote:
Hello,
Someone could inform me if there is an entry in bugtracker with
references to this topic?
This has already been fixed I believe. See
In our previous episode, Brian said:
The fpGUI units were recompiled with directive -Ur
When the helloworld.pas file is compiled using Geany (with -Ur and -Va) for
some reason FPC can't find the unit (fpg_impl.ppu) called by fp_base , even
though it is present in the folder with fpb_base.
The compiler accepts the directory and loads the first unit fpg_base , but
then fails to load the next unit that is called by fpg_base which is
fpg_impl . Then it fails.
Regards
Brian
--
View this message in context:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, Philippe wrote:
some days before we had same type of thread ...
the problem is
-Fu is not recursive!
And luckily not. The result would be a disaster !
However, you can use wildcards:
-Fu/home/some/dir/*
Michael.
Can I use {$unitpaht /home/some/dir/*} ?
--
Silvio
My mistake ...
Using directive -Va I can see that PFC cannot find fpg_base also.
Question : Does the directive $UNITPATH acvtually work ?
Regards
Brian
--
View this message in context:
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/Free-Pascal-Directories-tp5720212p5720266.html
Sent from
bad ideia :
(with windows we have a limite from the command line
size!)
I copy recursively all the files from directories I need in a
unique directory ... then compile from it!!!
ugly! ... may be ... but
it works !!! recursively!!! and it is quite fast to copy ... and I spent
time in
Conclusion :
Using {$UNITPATH /home/some/*} in the main program DOES NOT WORK !
When using Geany if the directive is added in Set Build Command , COMPILE
line as -Fu/home/some/* it works properly.
Much better than dumping everything into one pot.
Regards
Brian
--
View this message in
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Brian v...@golden.net wrote:
Conclusion :
Using {$UNITPATH /home/some/*} in the main program DOES NOT WORK !
[...]
=(
--
Silvio Clécio
My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
On 02/10/14 22:52, Brian wrote:
Conclusion :
Using {$UNITPATH/home/some/*} in the main program DOES NOT WORK !
It behaves exactly as documented at
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progsu121.html :
Note that this switch does not propagate to other units, i.e. it’s
scope is limited
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be
wrote:
On 02/10/14 22:52, Brian wrote:
Conclusion :
Using {$UNITPATH/home/some/*} in the main program DOES NOT WORK !
It behaves exactly as documented at http://www.freepascal.org/
docs-html/prog/progsu121.html :
On 02/10/14 23:23, silvioprog wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be
mailto:jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be wrote:
Note that this switch does not propagate to other units, i.e. it’s
scope is limited to the current unit.
unit should be interpreted as
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be
wrote:
On 02/10/14 23:23, silvioprog wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be
mailto:jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be wrote:
Note that this switch does not propagate to other units, i.e.
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014 18:40:01 -0300
silvioprog silviop...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
But it would be an nice feature in Free Pascal, something like the import
of Python and Java. =)
Java requires a CLASSPATH for the imports to work, does it not?
Mattias
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de
wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014 18:40:01 -0300
silvioprog silviop...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
But it would be an nice feature in Free Pascal, something like the
import
of Python and Java. =)
Java requires a CLASSPATH
Am 02.10.2014 22:25 schrieb Philippe phili...@quarta.com.br:
bad ideia :
(with windows we have a limite from the command line size!)
If you can't work with 8000 characters then simply use a cfg file and pass
that. It's not as if you change your paths every hour...
Regards,
Sven
2014-10-02 23:07 GMT+08:00 Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be:
On 02 Oct 2014, at 15:59, Xiangrong Fang wrote:
It will make your program unstable (adding an element to an fplist can
cause the entire internal array to move, so if you are in the middle of a
read operation at the same time,
@cfg
I read about that option in a previous message of the thread
... clearly a better ideia!!! ... I´ll use it for sure!
taking
advantage of the oportunity. when one type fpc in the command line,
he/she gets:
D:psl9c9fpc
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.6.4
[2014/03/06] for i386
Copyright
36 matches
Mail list logo
