I installed Kubuntu from a USB Stick (you can dd the iso file to an usb-stick
and then boot from it, very userfriendly!)
http://www.kubuntu.org
There is also a userfriendly package manager included.
http://www.packagekit.org
With this package manager it was the first time, that I installed very
Does more cpu cores mean less compile time?
I am searching for a new computer, which is the best cpu?
Is it possible to write the compile time in the Lazarus output window?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
procedure getchars( p : pchar );
var l : longint;
begin
l := length( p );
end;
If calling getchars with chars longer than 255 l is always 255.
For example:
getchars( '12345 ... 255256257258' +
'1234567213939873987' +
...
...
Am Sunday 13 November 2011 02:15:07 schrieb leledumbo:
It works when {$LONGSTRINGS ON} or {$H+} directive exists. I think the
compiler treats functions receiving array of char (or pointer to it) as
ShortString when none of the directives above exist.
No it does not work then.
I put already the
Am Monday 14 November 2011 22:00:28 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
On 13 Nov 2011, at 14:02, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Sunday 13 November 2011 02:15:07 schrieb leledumbo:
It works when {$LONGSTRINGS ON} or {$H+} directive exists. I think the
compiler treats functions receiving array of char
Am Wednesday 16 November 2011 17:15:51 schrieb Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be
wrote:
length(pchar) is translated into strlen(pchar) (just like in Delphi).
But why is it limited to 255 chars in {$H-} ? (I understood that it
Is it possible to get information of the name of a var?
For Example.
var
counter : longint;
varname : shortstring;
varname := nameofvar( counter );
The content of varname then is 'counter'.
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
Am Monday 21 November 2011 14:08:43 schrieb michael.vancann...@wisa.be:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Is it possible to get information of the name of a var?
For Example.
var
counter : longint;
varname : shortstring;
varname := nameofvar( counter
Am Monday 21 November 2011 20:06:10 schrieb Jeppe Græsdal Johansen:
Den 21-11-2011 13:56, Rainer Stratmann skrev:
Is it possible to get information of the name of a var?
For Example.
var
counter : longint;
varname : shortstring;
varname := nameofvar( counter
Am Tuesday 22 November 2011 10:13:20 schrieb michael.vancann...@wisa.be:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 21.11.2011 14:22, schrieb michael.vancann...@wisa.be:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Monday 21 November 2011 14:08:43 schrieb michael.vancann...@wisa.be
Am Tuesday 22 November 2011 12:05:07 schrieb michael.vancann...@wisa.be:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 22.11.2011 10:13, schrieb michael.vancann...@wisa.be:
If we choose to implement such a function, yes. My response was based
on the compiler as it is.
Seems like I'm not the
Am Tuesday 22 November 2011 12:14:54 schrieb michael.vancann...@wisa.be:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Tuesday 22 November 2011 12:05:07 schrieb michael.vancann...@wisa.be:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 22.11.2011 10:13, schrieb michael.vancann...@wisa.be
Am Tuesday 22 November 2011 14:09:42 schrieb michael.vancann...@wisa.be:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
The name of a variable is only used for debugging, and then you can
just as well use the debug info. And the change of a name is usually
done with searchreplace, option
Am Tuesday 22 November 2011 13:50:06 schrieb John Lee:
Call me old fashioned, but to ask for this capability to save typing seems
bizarre.
There are many functions I don't need. For example am I not a friend of
dynamic allocated memory.
I have reasons for not using it.
You may have reasons for
Isn't it possible to put all processors in the compiler.
At least ARM and 8086 because they are the most popular.
As I know now it is one compiler program each processor.
Just a question.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Am Thursday 22 December 2011 21:33:13 schrieb Timothy Groves:
Can anyone think of a situation in which you would *have* to use forward
declared functions? I'm trying to come up with an example for such for
my book, and I am drawing a blank.
___
Am Thursday 22 December 2011 22:04:34 schrieb Anton Shepelev:
Fward decla-
rations are necessary to allow mutually recur-
sive procedures and functions that are not nest-
ed.
Forward declarations are the only option in special situations:
If your program is huge and you only have this option
Am Sunday 08 January 2012 02:17:29 schrieb Luciano de Souza:
I have downloaded a Lazarus deb package compatible with FPC 2.4.4. I try
to install with: sudo dpkg -i *. It fails, so: sudo apt-get install -f.
...
...
...
This was already some time discussed here and in my opinion this is the
Am Sunday 08 January 2012 13:35:49 schrieb Sven Barth:
On 08.01.2012 13:06, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Sunday 08 January 2012 02:17:29 schrieb Luciano de Souza:
I have downloaded a Lazarus deb package compatible with FPC 2.4.4. I try
to install with: sudo dpkg -i *. It fails, so: sudo apt
Am Friday 13 January 2012 06:58:53 schrieb Martin Schreiber:
Hi,
MSEide+MSEgui 2.8 for FPC 2.6.0 has been released:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mseide-msegui/
Martin
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Am Friday 13 January 2012 12:13:17 schrieb Martin Schreiber:
Am Friday 13 January 2012 11.22:52 schrieb Rainer Stratmann:
You can not go to xxx with the cursor in your editor.
You can only go to the end of a line.
Can you fix that?
begin
for x := 1 to 10 do
writeln;
end
Am Monday 06 February 2012 14:27:20 schrieb Koenraad Lelong:
I do have a working crosscompiler (I think), only I have to call it via
/usr/lib/fpc/2.6.0/ppcrossarm ..., instead of via fpc ...
The code seems not to work, but that could be my own RTL, which I copied
from SMT32F103RE. I'm working
Am Monday 19 December 2011 01:22:18 schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
Hi,
For some reason TFPHTTPClient.Post hangs when accessing a solr
server over tomcat. It works with solr over jetty.
curl works fine with both, so I guess the tomcat server works
normally.
Here is the code:
Am Wednesday 08 February 2012 12:24:11 schrieb Koenraad Lelong:
Hi,
I'm searching for some document how to set up a system to use two
versions of fpc.
I'm trying to make a working arm-embedded compiler. With 2.6.0 I seem
unable to do that, so I want to try it with the svn-version of fpc. But
Am Friday 10 February 2012 08:25:01 schrieb Koenraad Lelong:
I did another experiment.
I make a zip-file with a 2.7.1 compiler and its sources. I installled
this on a brand new virtual machine with OpenSuse, so no fpc 2.6.0
available. With this I compiled the compiler itself (no install). This
Am Friday 10 February 2012 15:24:11 schrieb Reinier Olislagers:
Hi all,
With the help of the people on the forums and the lists, I've completed
the first version of FPCup, a tool that downloads FPC and Lazarus
sources from SVN, compiles and installs them.
Sorry for not reading the whole
Am Monday 20 February 2012 16:09:44 schrieb Juha Manninen:
2012/2/20 Henry Vermaak henry.verm...@gmail.com
On 20/02/12 14:03, Juha Manninen wrote:
It is funny how people still think the Debian based package system is
the best. It was so maybe 10 or 15 years ago but not any more.
These
Am Sunday 01 April 2012 19:27:25 schrieb Martin Schreiber:
Hi,
MSEide+MSEgui 2.8.2 has been released:
If you made it possible to go behind the last character of the line with the
cursor as in all modern IDE's I will try it again. See discussion from
13.01.2012.
That shoud be relatively easy
How to get debug information?
There is an error, but only adresses are shown.
I put on debugger Information in Lazarus (-g) but can get no further infos
when an error occurs (except the adresses).
Lazarus 0.9.30
fpc 2.4.2
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
Am Sunday 27 May 2012 17:44:41 schrieb Sven Barth:
On 27.05.2012 14:32, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
How to get debug information?
There is an error, but only adresses are shown.
I put on debugger Information in Lazarus (-g) but can get no further
infos when an error occurs (except
Am Monday 28 May 2012 21:12:30 schrieb Martin:
On 27/05/2012 13:32, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
How to get debug information?
There is an error, but only adresses are shown.
How/ Where are the addresses shown?
The addresses were shown in the output window (console).
Runtime error 207
Am Monday 28 May 2012 22:09:21 schrieb Martin:
On 28/05/2012 20:35, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Monday 28 May 2012 21:12:30 schrieb Martin:
On 27/05/2012 13:32, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
How to get debug information?
There is an error, but only adresses are shown.
How/ Where
Am Monday 28 May 2012 22:25:47 schrieb Martin:
Check that you have not accidentally set any options that will block
-gl, such as -Xs or maybe (may work but I do not know for sure) -Xg
After changing options, change Build or Build all from run menu.
All done, same effect (only addresses
Am Tuesday 29 May 2012 01:42:12 schrieb Martin:
On 28/05/2012 23:53, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Monday 28 May 2012 22:25:47 schrieb Martin:
Check that you have not accidentally set any options that will block
-gl, such as -Xs or maybe (may work but I do not know for sure) -Xg
After
Is it still necessary to fill in the registers at the end of a asm statement?
What happens if there is only the end; statement without the used registers?
asm
mov eax , ebx
end ['EAX' , 'EBX' ... ];
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
Am Tuesday 12 June 2012 18:44:20 schrieb leledumbo:
What happens if there is only the end; statement without the used
registers?
The compiler couldn't save the values in the registers prior to the asm
block. If they contain intermediate result, they may be gone and unexpected
result would
Does someone know how to do encryption and decryption with keys?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Am Sunday 24 June 2012 16:59:36 schrieb leledumbo:
key := 'testkey';
value := 'this is a string';
How is it working?
By xoring 'testkey' with 'this is a string' byte by byte?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
How to put longstrings globally on?
I tried with {$h+} in project compiler settings (other) with no effect.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Am Wednesday 04 July 2012 06:30:57 schrieb leledumbo:
Example of this no effect? {$H+} should do it.
Is it global (for all sourcefiles) if put on top of the first sourcefile?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Am Wednesday 04 July 2012 10:22:10 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
In our previous episode, J?rgen Hestermann said:
How to put longstrings globally on?
I tried with {$h+} in project compiler settings (other) with no effect.
Safest method is not to use the generic type string in your code.
Am Wednesday 04 July 2012 12:12:10 schrieb Bart:
On 7/4/12, Rainer Stratmann rainerstratm...@t-online.de wrote:
Next question is how to put asmmode intel global on?
Type fpc -h (in a console) to see all commandine parameters.
Then take a look at the -R switch.
That works thank you very much
procedure p1;
begin
...
end;
How to get all caller adresses of p1 in a program before p1 is executed?
For example p1 is called from 20 different places in a program.
Then I need the 20 caller adresses.
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
Am Monday 06 August 2012 18:43:04 schrieb Martin:
How to get all caller adresses of p1 in a program before p1 is executed?
For example p1 is called from 20 different places in a program.
Then I need the 20 caller adresses.
At run time, or design time?
At runtime.
I ment the (memory)
Am Monday 06 August 2012 19:34:23 schrieb Sven Barth:
You know that scanning the binary code for calls is platform dependant?
Yes.
[calling opcode] [calleradress]
calling opcode can differ and the byteorder of the adress can differ.
So you'd need to write that code for every CPU you want to
Am Monday 06 August 2012 22:17:11 schrieb Martin:
But let me say: I am with everyone else. Using stack/caller info is the
wrong(est) way.
I fully agree.
And if you need to ask What is the content of the stack? Then you
should not use it.
All this functions are very low level. Usinc this kind
Am Monday 06 August 2012 22:37:08 schrieb Aleksa Todorovic:
program test_str_36;
uses
sysutils;
function s(str: pchar): pchar;
var
str2: pchar;
begin
if str[0] = '~' then
begin
// string is not localized
str2 := strnew('numero'); // localized version
ppchar(str)^
Am Monday 06 August 2012 22:57:42 schrieb Martin:
On 06/08/2012 21:39, Rainer Stratmann wrote
Can you explain it more?
I want not search through the sourcecode, because it makes it less easy.
How does an address like $040012a help you find the source?
If I have a list with all caller
Am Monday 06 August 2012 23:36:10 schrieb Martin:
On 06/08/2012 21:57, Martin wrote:
I am still trying to understand what exactly you try to archive.
Ok, I read one of the other posts: Do you need to ensure to handle each
snippet only once?
Are *ALL* snippets constants?
yes, but they are
Am Tuesday 07 August 2012 00:02:02 schrieb Martin:
I still do not understand what is so special about the caller address?
Furthermore, you said yourself, you do not need it. You can also live
withe a number that the compiler generates at compilation time.
With all caller adresses OR all
Am Tuesday 07 August 2012 11:34:10 schrieb Martin:
With all caller adresses OR all numbers (see down) I have the whole
amount of snippets that I want to have.
How?
With the compiler keyword 'calleradresstable';
function s( str : pchar ) : pchar; calleradresstable;
Then the compiler makes
Am Tuesday 07 August 2012 19:13:29 schrieb Martin:
On 07/08/2012 17:58, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
With the compiler keyword 'calleradresstable';
function s( str : pchar ) : pchar; calleradresstable;
Then the compiler makes a table of all calleradresses and also the amount
of s
How is it possible to put some inline bytes in the code like the former
inline( $1f , $ef , $1A );
instruction?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Am Thursday 09 August 2012 15:14:29 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
Rainer Stratmann wrote on Thu, 09 Aug 2012:
How is it possible to put some inline bytes in the code like the former
inline( $1f , $ef , $1A );
instruction?
{$asmmode att}
asm
.byte $0x1f, $0xef, $0x1a
end;
{$asmmode intel
Is it possible to get the adress of a label in a procedure?
label mark1;
procedure s;
begin
mark1:
end;
var p : pointer;
begin
p := @mark1; // does not work;
end;
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Am Thursday 09 August 2012 15:33:52 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
Thanks, the next problem then is: I wanted to do that in an inline
procedure but if the compiler detects an asm statement then inline is
disabled(!).
That's correct, it is not possible inline assembler statements in FPC.
You can try
Am Thursday 09 August 2012 15:35:54 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
Rainer Stratmann wrote on Thu, 09 Aug 2012:
Is it possible to get the adress of a label in a procedure?
Not outside that procedure, no.
Would it be possible to chage it, to get this information?
May be it is only some kind of accident
Am Thursday 09 August 2012 17:09:57 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
if it were added it would be
quite possible that this would also disable inlining the containing
routine for implementation reasons.
I think the reason for disabling is that in the asm code can be identifyers
and jumplabels which are
Am Thursday 09 August 2012 17:18:09 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
I would really recommend you (again) to use resourcestrings.
You say that is not possible and that is not possible (or someone can say: you
don't want to go deep in it).
Beyond that you recommend me your style of programming.
I see
The code below finds all caller adresses in a program to a known
procedure/function adress.
With this I can get all caller adresses to the translate function.
Moreover - with another piece of code (not shown here) I got also the text
snippets itself, because they are loaded immediately before
Am Saturday 11 August 2012 13:40:44 schrieb Rainer Stratmann:
procedure i_realy_know_what_i_am_doing( p_opcode : pbyte ; count : longint
; proc_adr : pointer );
Better: i_really_know_what_i_am_doing
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal
Am Saturday 11 August 2012 13:52:58 schrieb Martin:
On 11/08/2012 12:48, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Saturday 11 August 2012 13:40:44 schrieb Rainer Stratmann:
procedure i_realy_know_what_i_am_doing( p_opcode : pbyte ; count :
longint ; proc_adr : pointer );
Better
Am Saturday 11 August 2012 14:15:11 schrieb Martin:
I do not read all discussions.
Which exactly headline has it?
Does it affect the possibility to get the information I want?
Re: [fpc-devel] Re: Class field reordering
The searched procedure/function is not a class procedure or function.
Am Saturday 11 August 2012 14:46:53 schrieb Martin:
On 11/08/2012 13:32, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Saturday 11 August 2012 14:15:11 schrieb Martin:
If that changes, then your code fails.
I can easily adopt the code then.
There are not many different ways for a call.
http
Am Saturday 11 August 2012 17:34:44 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
In our previous episode, Rainer Stratmann said:
But not the 80x86 CPU. It is still the same opcode for a call ($E8).
Maybe not the call, but changing or adding address encoding is quite
realistic.
I assume you tested your code
Am Saturday 11 August 2012 19:18:39 schrieb Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior:
Sorry for posting without bringing a solution, but i am curious, why
do you need this ?
Doesnt sound like good programming practice...
See Thread:
Get all caller adresses of a given function/procedure before executing
We
not be very much wrong if it is still working.
Thats my two cents...
2012/8/11 Rainer Stratmann rainerstratm...@t-online.de:
Am Saturday 11 August 2012 19:18:39 schrieb Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior:
Sorry for posting without bringing a solution, but i am curious, why
do you need this ?
Doesnt
Am Sunday 12 August 2012 15:29:44 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
Florian already implemented that quite a while ago :) I suggest to drop the
topic though, because Rainer does not appear to be open to taking another
approach
It depends on the approach.
If you have a better solution would you take another
Am Sunday 12 August 2012 15:46:00 schrieb Sven Barth:
I know there is a smiley, but: Only because Jonas sees no gain in
implementing something in the compiler that would help you in your
specific case does not mean that Jonas doesn't add anything that causes
not much work.
That my suggestions
Am Monday 13 August 2012 10:35:55 schrieb Lukasz Sokol:
On 12/08/2012 14:41, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
It depends on the approach.
If you have a better solution would you take another approach?
What is wrong with known and explored ways e.g. gettext ?
It will be ok for those who
Am Monday 13 August 2012 12:07:59 schrieb Lukasz Sokol:
On 13/08/2012 10:09, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
If I put a ls('snippet') around all texts I now get every caller adress
(handle) and the text information 'snippet' itself. So before they are
called I can make a list with all handles
Am Monday 13 August 2012 12:29:51 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
Still if we want an own editor, converting gorm would be an option.
I do this online.
http://109.91.95.104/sprache
Not yet complete, but for demonstration ok.
From outside changes are not possible by now.
Am Tuesday 14 August 2012 03:28:26 schrieb waldo kitty:
On 8/13/2012 05:09, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Monday 13 August 2012 10:35:55 schrieb Lukasz Sokol:
[TRIM]
You were saying, that you want to know, which string has not been
used / which string has been used and how many times
Am Tuesday 14 August 2012 10:17:52 schrieb Sven Barth:
Am 14.08.2012 09:11, schrieb Rainer Stratmann:
No need for tons od additional identyfiers and additional lines like:
var
p_snippet1 : pchar;
p_snippet2 : pchar;
p_snippet3 : pchar;
const
id_snippet1 = 'ids_snippet1
Am Tuesday 14 August 2012 14:36:44 schrieb Martin:
On 14/08/2012 13:19, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
It was more or less exactly the way I did it before with little
exaggerating as you notice :-)
Even now I save 50% codesize in comparison to resourcestring.
If you don't like resource string
discovar that his solution is nor portable nor safe...
2012/8/14 Rainer Stratmann rainerstratm...@t-online.de:
Am Tuesday 14 August 2012 14:36:44 schrieb Martin:
On 14/08/2012 13:19, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
It was more or less exactly the way I did it before with little
exaggerating as you
Am Wednesday 15 August 2012 03:52:00 schrieb waldo kitty:
On 8/14/2012 03:11, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Tuesday 14 August 2012 03:28:26 schrieb waldo kitty:
i've been following this whole thread with interest... one thing that
i'm still not clear about, though, is why is this important
Am Wednesday 15 August 2012 04:05:56 schrieb Martin:
On 15/08/2012 02:52, waldo kitty wrote:
this would be no different than the program doing
writeln(snippet1);
.i must still be missing something :?
If I understood him correct:
It is not
writeln(snippet1);
it is
Am Wednesday 15 August 2012 09:33:37 schrieb Rainer Stratmann:
What means POV?
Ok. Point of view I assume.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Am Wednesday 15 August 2012 10:20:34 schrieb Reinier Olislagers:
On 15-8-2012 10:08, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Yes, that is possible as I understand it so far.
I did not know (dx)gettext before so replication is may not the right
word.
Yes, it is. Replication is doing the same thing twice
Am Wednesday 15 August 2012 12:29:23 schrieb Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior:
And a
disadvantage is may the longer time to find a solution.
Thats not the only disadvantage. Reinventing the wheel usually means
you get something less correct and less researched. Its simple, 1000
eyes looking for a
Am Wednesday 15 August 2012 13:39:11 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
In our previous episode, Rainer Stratmann said:
You already have a very good grasp of the issues involved as you were
writing your own solution. You could probably improve dxgettext with
some things and get that in the main
Am Wednesday 15 August 2012 14:13:41 schrieb Sven Barth:
Am 15.08.2012 10:48 schrieb Rainer Stratmann rainerstratm...@t-online.de
While this may all be very well known to you, I would ask you to step
back and consider it: having a detached look at it may lead to a better
choice
Am Wednesday 15 August 2012 14:49:04 schrieb Rainer Stratmann:
I would call this function rs( s : pchar ) because it has to be short.
if there is a rs() in the program the compiler stores the caller adress
(unique handle) and the pointer to the pchar in a list.
If the pointer to pchar
Am Wednesday 15 August 2012 15:20:21 schrieb Lukasz Sokol:
On 15/08/2012 13:55, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Wednesday 15 August 2012 14:49:04 schrieb Rainer Stratmann:
I would call this function rs( s : pchar ) because it has to be short.
if there is a rs() in the program the compiler stores
Am Wednesday 15 August 2012 16:45:03 schrieb Lukasz Sokol:
For example if FPC internals decide to add or remove some padding in
front of the constants.
Very unlikely.
For which reason should there be padding in front?
For the reason that they always say not to rely on 'internal
Am Wednesday 15 August 2012 19:58:02 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
No. The route was this:
- In an earlier msg I mentioned this as dxgettext limitation (since I ran
into it)
- In a later msg you said you got weary of dxgettext because of problems
with it.
- I replied that it was not a
Am Thursday 16 August 2012 10:16:04 schrieb Lukasz Sokol:
On 15/08/2012 16:05, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Wednesday 15 August 2012 16:45:03 schrieb Lukasz Sokol:
If the maintainers decide to build in the suggested function above then
everthing is solved. By now no one of the maintainers
Am Thursday 16 August 2012 10:50:25 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
Lukasz Sokol wrote:
Please explain.
I do not change the code. I am only searching some pointers.
Well, yeah, _you_ don't. What if somebody else could create a program
that extracts private (unexported) function pointers from
Am Thursday 16 August 2012 11:27:08 schrieb Rainer Stratmann:
Customers are fully satisfied and know about my fast responce.
response
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Am Thursday 16 August 2012 12:23:00 schrieb Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior:
I still dont understand why dont you hack passrc and grab all the
strings from the source ?
Because I have an almost finished solution. I worked already for a while on
it. Some integrated piece of code is easier to handle
Am Thursday 16 August 2012 13:27:17 schrieb Lukasz Sokol:
So from this POV, his process /is/ easier: he runs his program, and tells
it to export strings to be translated, then loads 'snippets' on demand/on
next execution.
Yes.
To Rainer: Please accept apologies, I did not mean to offend you
Am Thursday 16 August 2012 13:53:18 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
And let's not forget: if we choose a reasonable default library name,
99% of all problems fall away by themselves, and the component will
not be needed in the first place; Just for special cases will you need it.
I did not follow
Does the compiler generates (an) assembler file(s)?
I did not find here:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/prog.html
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Am Saturday 18 August 2012 22:10:17 schrieb Martin:
On 18/08/2012 21:03, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Does the compiler generates (an) assembler file(s)?
I did not find here:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/prog.html
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/user/userch5.html#x33-45
Am Saturday 18 August 2012 23:53:36 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
On 18 Aug 2012, at 22:48, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
I did option -a, the compiler needs longer now, but where can I see the
generated file(s)?
In the same directory that contains the generated .o and .ppu files
Am Sunday 19 August 2012 10:59:16 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
On 19 Aug 2012, at 10:55, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Saturday 18 August 2012 23:53:36 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
On 18 Aug 2012, at 22:48, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
I did option -a, the compiler needs longer now, but where can I see
Am Sunday 19 August 2012 18:01:42 schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
Can you try a newer version?
I am afraid of all the problems then with installing on a linux computer.
The computer further has no connection to the internet.
I try step by step to get more independend from lazarus first.
Then it will
I try to be independend from lazarus and wrote a configure file which I then
pass to fpc at the console.
Now suddenly the linker is noteable slower.
In both modes (from lazarus and from console).
Which reason can it have?
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
Am Friday 24 August 2012 11:00:35 schrieb Tomas Hajny:
On Fri, August 24, 2012 10:52, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
I try to be independend from lazarus and wrote a configure file which I
then
pass to fpc at the console.
Now suddenly the linker is noteable slower.
In both modes (from
1 - 100 of 458 matches
Mail list logo
