Am Wednesday 15 August 2012 14:13:41 schrieb Sven Barth: > Am 15.08.2012 10:48 schrieb "Rainer Stratmann" <rainerstratm...@t-online.de > > > > While this may all be very well known to you, I would ask you to step > > > back and consider it: having a detached look at it may lead to a better > > > choice. > > > > For me it would be interesting to know how dxgettext gets the snippet > > information from the program code...! > > It scans the source beforehand and looks for resourcestrings and > additionally for string constants embedded in a function call to "_()" > (which is their translation function). It also allows to scan DFM files.
If the compiler would simply store the 2 informations (caller adress, pointer to the pchar) in a list this scan beforehand would not be necessary anymore like in my solution. I would call this function rs( s : pchar ) because it has to be short. if there is a rs() in the program the compiler stores the caller adress (unique handle) and the pointer to the pchar in a list. That would be an advantage for freepascal if providing this information native and not by some kind of hack like I do now. Then also the compatible/portable discussion would have an end. And the jokes about try to make it more difficult to search through the opcodes :-) _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
