Re: [fpc-pascal] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: WebAssembly Target

2017-04-14 Thread Ryan Joseph
> On Apr 14, 2017, at 7:26 PM, Jürgen Hestermann > wrote: > > I doubt that you can do this only when allowing the execution of > arbitrary code (although I don't know very much about current HTML standards). I think you’re confusing Java for JavaScript. JavaScript

Re: [fpc-pascal] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: WebAssembly Target

2017-04-14 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017, Jürgen Hestermann wrote: Am 2017-04-14 um 11:03 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt: > On Fri, 14 Apr 2017, Jürgen Hestermann wrote: >> Am 2017-04-13 um 10:20 schrieb Michael Schnell: >> > So at the moment HTML5 and Java script is the way to go, but WebAssembly should recreate

Re: [fpc-pascal] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: WebAssembly Target

2017-04-14 Thread Jürgen Hestermann
Am 2017-04-14 um 11:03 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt: > On Fri, 14 Apr 2017, Jürgen Hestermann wrote: >> Am 2017-04-13 um 10:20 schrieb Michael Schnell: >> > So at the moment HTML5 and Java script is the way to go, but WebAssembly should recreate Action Script versatility performance in a more

Re: [fpc-pascal] WebAssembly Target

2017-04-14 Thread Jürgen Hestermann
Am 2017-04-13 um 10:20 schrieb Michael Schnell: > So at the moment HTML5 and Java script is the way to go, but WebAssembly should recreate Action Script versatility performance in a more "Standard" way. I hate Java Script and use NoScript to block it. I can't understand why scripting is needed

Re: [fpc-pascal] WebAssembly Target

2017-04-14 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017, Jürgen Hestermann wrote: Am 2017-04-13 um 10:20 schrieb Michael Schnell: > So at the moment HTML5 and Java script is the way to go, but WebAssembly should recreate Action Script versatility performance in a more "Standard" way. I hate Java Script and use NoScript to

Re: [fpc-pascal] Threading vs Parallelism ?

2017-04-14 Thread Sven Barth via fpc-pascal
Am 14.04.2017 09:23 schrieb "Michael Schnell" : > > On 12.04.2017 14:09, Lars wrote: >> >> If unix could just make processes even lighter weight or >> faster loading, I might avoid threads and just use processes... > > in Unix/Linux processes are not less "light" then threads.

Re: [fpc-pascal] Threading vs Parallelism ?

2017-04-14 Thread Michael Schnell
On 12.04.2017 14:09, Lars wrote: If unix could just make processes even lighter weight or faster loading, I might avoid threads and just use processes... in Unix/Linux processes are not less "light" then threads. You can create a process by "fork". no "Loading" involved. it just creates the

Re: [fpc-pascal] WebAssembly Target

2017-04-14 Thread Michael Schnell
On 12.04.2017 15:49, nore...@z505.com wrote: Why run webgl through javascript if you could just make something like a flash plugin object We once did a decent application using Pascal at the server and Flash (Action Script) at the client site. Works very nicely. But Action Script is Adobe

Re: [fpc-pascal] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: WebAssembly Target

2017-04-14 Thread Jürgen Hestermann
Am 2017-04-14 um 13:53 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt: >> Why is it scripting needed to display a calendar? > To display a popup menu, for example. > Or completion when typing in an edit: when you invite someone, it's handy > when calendar suggests the contact name. I doubt that you can do this

Re: [fpc-pascal] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: WebAssembly Target

2017-04-14 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017, Jürgen Hestermann wrote: Am 2017-04-14 um 13:53 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt: >> Why is it scripting needed to display a calendar? > To display a popup menu, for example. > Or completion when typing in an edit: when you invite someone, it's handy > when calendar suggests

Re: [fpc-pascal] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: WebAssembly Target

2017-04-14 Thread Jürgen Hestermann
Am 2017-04-14 um 15:12 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt: >> I want to keep control about what is executed on my computer. > So you are running an open source OS ? Unfortunately not (yet). I am working on getting rid of windows but some programs not available on Linux prevented me from doing this step

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freevision etc.

2017-04-14 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
On 13/04/17 10:00, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: My first problem is that there's a name clash between the Freevision and LCL variants of some units. I appear to be able to use something like uses Objects, Views in '/usr/local/lib/fpc/3.0.2/units/arm-linux/fv/views', Dialogs in