Re: [fprint] [Fwd: Re: Upek Eikon II]

2010-04-28 Thread Jorge Suárez de Lis
The upeksonly device seems to work *very* differently to the other two devices. The upeksonly driver has not the same structure as the upekts driver as well, and we should need to take a very deep look into its code to do the matching. I mean, that would be a lot of hard work. I like your idea,

Re: [fprint] [Fwd: Re: Upek Eikon II]

2010-04-27 Thread Alexia Death
I don't think there's any way to do this on fprint. I still have to take a better look at the code, but it seems that the drivers just register themselves as I am ready to support the device with these IDs, so I'll do the job. I have an upeksonly device. It must be possible to differentiate

Re: [fprint] [Fwd: Re: Upek Eikon II]

2010-04-26 Thread David Hollis
On 04/26/2010 02:33 PM, Jorge Suárez de Lis wrote: That's weird. I've never received 2e. You should receive 0d, then 0e, then 26 and then 27. But not 2e. Is your device the same as mine? On the barcode it says TCRD4CA1H6A3. Try this, after line 1000 (case 0x27:) add this: I can't check

Re: [fprint] [Fwd: Re: Upek Eikon II]

2010-04-26 Thread David Hollis
Full lsusb output: Bus 001 Device 003: ID 147e:2016 Upek Biometric Touchchip/Touchstrip Fingerprint Sensor Device Descriptor: bLength18 bDescriptorType 1 bcdUSB 1.01 bDeviceClass0 (Defined at Interface level) bDeviceSubClass 0