On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 07:14:04PM -0400, Steven Kreuzer wrote:
I achieve 100% compatability with the GNU version, I need to add
-v/--version and the issue I ran into is that since this program would
become part of the base os, what exactly should be displayed.
I see no reason you need to be
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 03:21:01PM -0700, Bert JW Regeer wrote:
Even if BSD has no tradition to keep a separate program version, it is
still very handy to be able to give this data to other developers if
something is failing.
$ ident failing-binary is the output that means something. A
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 02:58:40PM +0200, Jordan Gordeev wrote:
I am a student who considers applying for Google's Summer of Code
programme.
One of my ideas for a GSoC project has the following synopsis:
Add virtual kernel (vkernel) support to FreeBSD for the i386 and amd64
16.03.08, 09:30, David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Add virtual kernel (vkernel) support to FreeBSD for the i386 and amd64
architectures.
The vkernel support in question is the one found in DragonFlyBSD.
Not being up on DragonFlyBSD, can you better describe what vkernel is?
vkernel is
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 03:21:01PM -0700, Bert JW Regeer wrote:
Even if BSD has no tradition to keep a separate program version, it is
still very handy to be able to give this data to other developers if
something is failing. Programs that don't have a -v or --version switch are
frustrating to
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 01:30:25 -0500, David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 02:58:40PM +0200, Jordan Gordeev wrote:
I am a student who considers applying for Google's Summer of Code
programme.
One of my ideas for a GSoC project has the following synopsis:
Add
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
16.03.08, 09:30, David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Add virtual kernel (vkernel) support to FreeBSD for the i386 and amd64
architectures.
The vkernel support in question is the one found in DragonFlyBSD.
Not being up on DragonFlyBSD, can you better
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Hi Eygene, I could only now test the new port and it works. Now it's
just a matter
of fine-tuning it (i.e. I'd like to increase the acceleration of the
pointer)
Thanks for the great job!
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
16.03.08, 09:30, David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Add virtual kernel (vkernel) support to FreeBSD for the i386 and amd64
architectures.
The vkernel support in question is the one found in DragonFlyBSD.
Not being up on DragonFlyBSD, can you
Jordan Gordeev wrote:
Hello!
I am a student who considers applying for Google's Summer of Code
programme.
One of my ideas for a GSoC project has the following synopsis:
Add virtual kernel (vkernel) support to FreeBSD for the i386 and
amd64 architectures.
The vkernel support in question
What's vkernel's or modern UML multithreaded performance compared to native?
I have not been reading hackers in a long time and have no idea what's going
on... Please excuse my butting in...
Given the fact that there are not as many developers as needed, what would be a
practical purpose of
Dont hold me for this: but I remmeber that I read somewhere that if
projector is connected before Xorg starts available resolutions to
projector would be limited.
So best is to disconnect and connect it again when Xorg is already running.
Beware: I dont have experience with projectors with Xorg,
I seem to recall I just had to play with xrandr to get an external
monitor to work on my dell while my old Toshiba laptop used to need the
function-f3 or f4 key pressing, but its not something i've done recently
enough to remember the exact procedure for either.
Vince
Paul B. Mahol wrote:
Basically DragonFly has a syscall API that allows a userland process
to create and completely control any number of VM spaces, including
the ability to pass execution control to a VM space and get it back,
and control memory mappings within that VM space (and in the virtual
:
:Given the fact that there are not as many developers as needed, what would be
a practical purpose of vkernel?
:
:UML is typically used to debug drivers and/or for hosting. Now that Linux
about to have or already has container technology, hosting on UML makes little
sense.
The single
:Finally, the way vkernels were implemented in dragonfly was *very*
:disruptive to the kernel source (lots of function renaming etc), so it
:is likely that this would also have to be completely reimplemented in a
:FreeBSD port.
:...
:Kris
Well, I don't think I would agree with your
do sysctl -a | grep nonoptimal_volumes
this should find an oid somewhere under mpt branch, and it should
reflect the number of raid volumes in state other than optimal.
in most cases this means that a disk has gone bad.
Cristiano Deana wrote:
Hi,
I'm using a 7-RELEASE on a Dell PowerEdge
Matthew Dillon wrote:
:Finally, the way vkernels were implemented in dragonfly was *very*
:disruptive to the kernel source (lots of function renaming etc), so it
:is likely that this would also have to be completely reimplemented in a
:FreeBSD port.
:...
:Kris
Well, I don't think I would
On 16/03/2008, Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another avenue to consider is the Linux KVM virtualization technology, which
is seeing a high level of interest in the Linux community and sounds
increasingly mature and well-exercised. It would also offer interesting
migration
Matt,
You sure won't argue that UML isolation is inherently better than one that can
be provided by a hypervisor. If the performance is the same, what are you
gaining?
Hypervisor while slow, allows treating a complete OS with all applications as a
black box. Why would I choose UML over a
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16/03/2008, Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another avenue to consider is the Linux KVM virtualization technology,
which
is seeing a high level of interest in the Linux community and sounds
increasingly
(Newbie) I have FreeBSD 6.3 working on my Asus AB-2800. I just attempted a
fresh install of 7.0 and it couldn't find my disks - No Disks Found! The
Motherboard Chipset is ATI RS300 / IXP200. Any suggestions would
be appreciated. Thanks!
___
22 matches
Mail list logo
