Hans Petter Selasky writes:
Hi,
Why should LISTs only be forward traversable? The following piece of
code make lists backward traversable:
No objection to the concept.
But...
/sys/sys/queue.h:
+#define LIST_PREV(head,elm,field) \
+ (((elm) == LIST_FIRST(head)) ? ((__typeof(elm))0) :
Sam Leffler writes:
I asked a certain person to add the obsd sysctl long ago but it never
happened.
That would be me.
And it wouldn't be the first time a ball got dropped. I'll get to
it. :-]
M
--
Mark R V Murray
What is the most interesting question you have asked?
What, if any, was the
, if I type rm anything, I wake up.
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/lib?
yes.
In current use
WANT_LINT= yes
in /etc/make.conf. This won't work in STABLE; I haven't MFCed it.
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
YACINE GHANJAOUI writes:
Anyone help me how to untar a file with this extention file.tar.bz2 ?
Thanks,
This is really questions@ material, but...
$ tar -y
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
getting something done, and if you like FreeBSD as much
as I do, that is an end in itself!
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail
any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
architectures like 256-bit machines. Doesn't
it make sense just to presume that out-of-range is impossible, and recode
for default if (sizeof(x) == 1) return x; (ignore syntax) ?
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
things with vi(1), instead of
with gcc :-)
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
maya Haddad writes:
would you help me in writing network LKM under linux kernel 2.4, small examol
e would be good.
You sent this to a FreeBSD list, you need to find a Linux list instead.
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED
but no errors
3. ./configure --with-pam --with-s-key// PAM was configured, but S/Key
wasn't.. dunno why yet
4. make sshd // below are the errors I got after a bunch of warnings
No.
That is NOT how its built.
Look at src/secure/*/*ssh*/Makefile
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
discussed
VERY many times.
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes:
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 04:46:10PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
+ We are currently being attacked by an individual who is attempting
+ to mass-subscribe our lists to other mailing lists.
+=20
+ PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO ANY OF THIS MAIL! I am taking care of it.
+=20
Hi
We are currently being attacked by an individual who is attempting
to mass-subscribe our lists to other mailing lists.
PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO ANY OF THIS MAIL! I am taking care of it.
Thank you for your co-operation. :-)
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
and filters to cater to your own pickiness.
Amen!
Can we get back on topic now, please? :-)
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
) if you don't
include it. The kernel-building individual would have had to have made
a decision to not include the RNG, and as such is assumed to know what
she is doing.
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers
.
Indeed. Good move.
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
aoutput at all.
Maybe do it on a vty instead of in X.
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
_
Chat with friends online, try MSN
.
Maybe do it on a vty instead of in X.
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
_
Chat with friends online, try
keyboard?
I'm trying to see if /dev/random can be persuaded to give
_any_
aoutput at all.
Maybe do it on a vty instead of in X.
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
0 bytes transferred in 0.36 secs (0 bytes/sec)
Can you try a few of these while furiously abusing your keyboard?
I'm trying to see if /dev/random can be persuaded to give _any_
aoutput at all.
Maybe do it on a vty instead of in X.
M
--
o Mark Murray
not changed, but the OpenSSL code has. Maybe OpenSSL's
internal PRNG is doing something naughty.
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
:
Host key verification failed
Does anyone know why this happens, why it didn't happen prior to 4.6.2,
and
how I can fix it ?
The random device has not changed, but the OpenSSL code has. Maybe
OpenSSL's
internal PRNG is doing something naughty.
M
--
o Mark Murray
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
be persuaded to give _any_
aoutput at all.
Maybe do it on a vty instead of in X.
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
_
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http
+) it is in src/sys/dev/null/ and is much cleaner. :-)
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
.
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
#text/plain; name=cv.doc [Mark Murray CV Plain Text] cv.doc
#application/octet-stream; name=cv.pdf [Mark Murray CV PDF] cv.pdf
some testing, and it
would be nice to get it committed eventually.
Ooooh! :-)
Yes please!
I'll look at this.
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
#text/plain; name=cv.doc [Mark Murray CV Plain Text] cv.doc
#application/octet-stream; name=cv.pdf [Mark Murray CV
that we can be ready to use it later this year.
Also - have you looked at STABLE's /dev/urandom?
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
for us. He's not on
this list, so don't drop his address. I was more involved at the higher
levels of what we needed to get done when we rebased our appliance from
OpenBSD to FreeBSD last Summer.
:-) You may be pleasantly surprised :-)
M
(Thanks for the sources!)
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O
them as a PR, but have
not had time to. If you're interested I can send you the patches and you
can give them a try.
Hi.
Please send me what you have.
Thanks!
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
of using sufficient and required for pam_ssh and
pam_unix do not seem to affect things.
Nor should they :-)
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_ FreeBSD Services Limited
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers
independant files.
This has not been fixed. I could look at it (I am the author of that)
and look for a solution. It may take a bit of time.
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
--
o Mark Murray
\_ FreeBSD Services Limited
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap
This piece obviously has at least two errors. First, if PAM_OPT_AUTH_AS_SELF
is true, then value of user is undefined. It should probably log
pwd-pw_name instead. Second, check for root must of course be reversed
and become if (!pwd-pw_uid).
Fixed locally. Commit coming soon.
M
--
Mark
I think Mark Murray is still sitting on the patch I did for this very
thing. Check the -hackers mail archives. It was about 2-3 Months
ago, so it may not even patch cleanly anymore against -CURRENT.
I committed this today!
Apologies for the delay.
M
--
Mark Murray
Warning: this .sig
this.
(I think we are really close, BTW).
M
--
Mark Murray
Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
r programs. How does that sounds?
Wonderful!
If you need repo-copying done, I'm your man!
--
Mark Murray
Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Hi
Could you people please take this flamewar off our lists?
Thanks!
M
--part1_f8.65bd20b.278a2f74_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 1/7/2001 11:27:46 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
[
and postfix. The mail volumes will benefit
from hardware crypto. I really prefer to stay with Free, vs. Open.
Quite. :-)
Please don't ask anything more than your "quarterly query"; that way I won't
have to lie to you. :-)
M
--
Mark Murray
Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe:
that the lock can be blown away if needed.
Works like a charm.
M
--
Mark Murray
Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
the PID to see if it is still live.
If not, blow away the lockfile. If still alive and older than N minutes,
blow away the PID and break the lock.
M
--
Mark Murray
Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" i
sends out an
announcement (cryptograhically signed of course) letting folks
know what identity (fingerprint) to expect.
M
--
Mark Murray
Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
he's wrong. There was a time that we
were very lax about confirming the server public keys.
The last round of changes have all been confirmed by digital
signature by well-known server administrators.
M
--
Mark Murray
Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with &q
Anyone want to have a look at this? It's from the GNU awk maintainer.
Without knowing which random.c it was, it's hard to judge :-) Also not
knowing what the intended use is, it's hard to recommend something.
I'd guess src/lib/libc/stdlib/random.c
I'll bury it in my TODO.
M
--
Mark
Yes, it is this simple :-).
Can you get it ready for 4.2? I'd like to see us be able to
run bind9 in the next release.
Sure. I'll see if I can do it in the next couple of hours.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
- [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
It patches cleanly against -STABLE and -CURRENT, and only touches
libcrypt. Take a look at it, feedback/patches are welcome, and if you
like it, maybe someone can integrate it into -CURRENT. (I don't know
whose dept. this would be -- Mark Murray perhaps? )
http://www.frenchfries.net
If i do a perlcc test.pl i get the folllowing , in CURRENT ?
Must i define something beforehand, or is it broken ?
I'll take a look...
Looks like perl brokenness. The missing boot_DynaLoader is in DynaLoader.a,
but there is no way of linking it in.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM
If i do a perlcc test.pl i get the folllowing , in CURRENT ?
Must i define something beforehand, or is it broken ?
I'll take a look...
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ha
to Mark Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] who has done alot of
work with the current implementation of our random device.
I am currently rewriting FreeBSD's /dev/random device to use Schneier's
Yarrow algorithm. Some of it is in current, and a lot more is uncommitted.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM
sample program fail on NetBSD in the same way that
it failed on FreeBSD?
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
things use __COPYRIGHT; ftp(d?), routed and make. None of them
use \n's like you do.
I've sent private mail to Peter, who introduced this implementation of
__IDSTRING in rev 1.26 of cdefs.h.
Compatibility measure?
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe
need to
double-escape the \n's (like \\n) to get them into the .ident
line symbolically.
(I just checked - it worked!)
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Why not just use cvsup? It is already installed and running on internat
and the firewall is already configured to allow it through.
CVSUP only covers that which is already in CVS. The FTP stuff is
what this chap is looking for.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http
Mark Murray would know :-)
I think there's a lot of stale cruft on ftp.internat.freebsd.org which
doesn't need to be mirrored - Mark could probably tell us all which bits
are suitable for mirroring (this should be documented somewhere for
posterity)
Mostly packages and distfiles
...a sys/crypt/ directory should hold their DES code. :-)
^
Shouldn't this be crypto ? That is what I see if I look on internat
in the /usr/local/etc/cvsup/sup directory.
So it should, and in the patch that I have, it is :-).
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement
/ng_mppc.c which adds
MPPE/MPPC support for PPTP. However it's useless without an [A]RC4
implementation.
I'd like DES, arc4 and MD5/SHA for Yarrow.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ha
Does anybody know why ( i know that the directory /R/stage/trees/krb/
does not exist , but the directory /R/stage/trees/krb4/ do exist ) ??
For some reason, your src/release/* area is not getting updated.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe
expect to
be able to tweak it so that this his is not too heavy, and customisable.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
could be invented for src/crypto? We'd need
to make the distibution machinery understand that, but I don't see
too much a problem there.
I have no strong feelings about src/crypto/sys or src/sys/crypto.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail
/blowfish.h
src/sys/crypto/des/des_3cbc.c
src/sys/crypto/des/des.h
src/sys/crypto/des/des_cbc.c
src/sys/crypto/des/des_ecb.c
src/sys/crypto/des/des_locl.h
src/sys/crypto/des/des_setkey.c
src/sys/crypto/des/podd.h
src/sys/crypto/des/sk.h
src/sys/crypto/des/spr.h
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti
the buck very fast nowadays.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
that may
get Americans into trouble if they export it, so I maintain a copy
in South Africa (on internat.freebsd.org).
I'll be very happy to work with you on this one.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
could be invented for src/crypto? We'd need
to make the distibution machinery understand that, but I don't see
too much a problem there.
I have no strong feelings about src/crypto/sys or src/sys/crypto.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail
/blowfish.h
src/sys/crypto/des/des_3cbc.c
src/sys/crypto/des/des.h
src/sys/crypto/des/des_cbc.c
src/sys/crypto/des/des_ecb.c
src/sys/crypto/des/des_locl.h
src/sys/crypto/des/des_setkey.c
src/sys/crypto/des/podd.h
src/sys/crypto/des/sk.h
src/sys/crypto/des/spr.h
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti
very fast nowadays.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
make world with
NFS mounted disks, possibly using another FreeBSD box as
a router for extra stress.
Is this what you are looking for?
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hacke
with
NFS mounted disks, possibly using another FreeBSD box as
a router for extra stress.
Is this what you are looking for?
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
A regression test to make sure that the OS is not broken before you
inflict it on your colleagues/engineers?
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
it on standard idiots to check for install problems is a
human-engineering aproach you could also take? Impossible to automate,
though.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers
.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
a bit until it becomes greater than (or less than) the number
in question.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
So are there any _objections_ to having the kernel match promiscuous
"enabled" messages with "disabled" counterparts?
I strongly _request_ such a log message.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTE
So are there any _objections_ to having the kernel match promiscuous
enabled messages with disabled counterparts?
I strongly _request_ such a log message.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe
Who were the parties that were heading up the Kerberos 5 integration?
I have questions.
Me.
I will be bringiong in Heimdal (when it interoperates with MIT-K5).
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
both (Isuspect), and the r-utils also.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Who were the parties that were heading up the Kerberos 5 integration?
I have questions.
Me.
I will be bringiong in Heimdal (when it interoperates with MIT-K5).
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
both (Isuspect), and the r-utils also.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
What is holding back the work in the userland stuff then? Time?
No; the lack thereof ;-)
The current rush of things crypto has piqued my interest, so I am
hammering away quite hard these days.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail
The current rush of things crypto has piqued my interest, so I am
hammering away quite hard these days.
Well, would it be useful for me to commit the KERBEROS - KERBEROS4
changes?
Er, no; please submit them to me as patches. :-)
Thanks!
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http
(for
other encryption algorithms, pick a freely available implmenetation such
as the one from openssl).
This makes the most sense. Thrash it out as a port, and if that works,
we can bring it into both repositories.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send
(for
other encryption algorithms, pick a freely available implmenetation such
as the one from openssl).
This makes the most sense. Thrash it out as a port, and if that works,
we can bring it into both repositories.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send
DES, Mark, -hackers!
How about the following patch. It adds an OPTIONAL_MANPATH directive,
which is equivalent to the MANDATORY_MANPATH, except an absence of the
directory is not considered an error.
Cool! Do it, I say!
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
Why not just wait and bring the openssl library in?
Er - I do't think that will happen. Not for a while.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
usefulness
for DHCP and rarpd is too compelling.
Perhaps the comments in the GENERIC file could be updated.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
So I propose a new file wintendo, for all gaming file formats used on
the MS Windows platform.
Wintendo is a bad name for anything official. Try to find MS's
official name for the format(s).
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail
On Mon, 26 Jul 1999 22:17:20 +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
Wintendo is a bad name for anything official. Try to find MS's
official name for the format(s).
You're hoping for a standard name for file formats of games used on
Microsoft platformat? There are two words in that question that one
ironment (I think) so that app cannot
do any damage even if compromised.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
damage even if compromised.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
What is needed to make this support a more sensible number of IRQs?
Mainly changing the ioctl and its clients (rndcontrol only?) to supply
more bits.
I am currently rewriting /dev/random (and rndcontrol).
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe
for it to be more compatible with MITK5.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Quoth "Keith Stevenson":
(Mark Murray: jump in here if I get this wrong)
The way I understand it, a PAM module (pam_unix?) would need to be able to
look at the password hash and figure out which of the crypt functions to
call. Ideally, the PAM configuration would be able to spe
When you say rewriting, do you mean syncing with the version of the code
in Linux (1.04, instead of our 0.95) or actually rewriting? If the latter,
I'm curious as to what your aims are.
I want to implement Bruce Schneier's Yarrow.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http
What is needed to make this support a more sensible number of IRQs?
Mainly changing the ioctl and its clients (rndcontrol only?) to supply
more bits.
I am currently rewriting /dev/random (and rndcontrol).
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe
for it to be more compatible with MITK5.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Quoth Keith Stevenson:
(Mark Murray: jump in here if I get this wrong)
The way I understand it, a PAM module (pam_unix?) would need to be able to
look at the password hash and figure out which of the crypt functions to
call. Ideally, the PAM configuration would be able to specify which
When you say rewriting, do you mean syncing with the version of the code
in Linux (1.04, instead of our 0.95) or actually rewriting? If the latter,
I'm curious as to what your aims are.
I want to implement Bruce Schneier's Yarrow.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http
On Sun, 11 Jul 1999 22:34:09 +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
As long as the documentation is _clear_ that this is not a front-line
security tool, but rather a thing to marginally augment logs with
user-supplied info, then I'll buy it.
This is why I put forward a motion to move pidentd out
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo