On 29 Dec, Wes Peters wrote:
Bill Fumerola wrote:
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 04:04:36PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Fumerola, who states that security policy
information is un-available. However, I might
refer his comment to the Security Officer instead,
Bill Fumerola wrote:
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 04:04:36PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Fumerola, who states that security policy
information is un-available. However, I might
refer his comment to the Security Officer instead,
if Bill feels this
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 1:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Thread DIES [Re: ssh - are you nuts?!? ]
On 26 Dec, Mike Smith wrote
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 04:04:36PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Fumerola, who states that security policy
information is un-available. However, I might
refer his comment to the Security Officer instead,
if Bill feels this appropriate.
for the public record:
On 28 Dec, Bill Fumerola wrote:
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 04:04:36PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Fumerola, who states that security policy
information is un-available. However, I might
refer his comment to the Security Officer instead,
if Bill feels this
On 26 Dec, Mike Smith wrote:
If it is FUD as you claim, then the call should be made
by the SO. This would seem to be prudent policy.
Jesse, Kris *is* the Security Officer.
Now, please let this thread die.
Mike,
You and I don't often agree, but this time is worth noting.
I agree.
6 matches
Mail list logo
