Re: Problem on re0

2011-12-18 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 06:49:48PM +0200, Sami Halabi wrote: Hi, I've moved to a new server with bge card driver, similar configuration: /etc/sysctl.conf net.inet.flowtable.enable=0 net.inet.ip.fastforwarding=1 kern.ipc.somaxconn=8192 kern.ipc.shmmax=2147483648 kern.ipc.maxsockets=204800

Re: Problem on re0

2011-12-18 Thread Sami Halabi
Hi, It seems you have really complex network configuration(ipfw(4), lagg(4), dummynet(4), bridge(4) and ipsec(4) etc). Finding out simplest network setup that shows the issue would be required here. hmm.. i actually don't use lagg nor bridge nor ipsec, i compile them for any future use that might

Re: Problem on re0

2011-12-17 Thread Sami Halabi
Hi, I've moved to a new server with bge card driver, similar configuration: /etc/sysctl.conf net.inet.flowtable.enable=0 net.inet.ip.fastforwarding=1 kern.ipc.somaxconn=8192 kern.ipc.shmmax=2147483648 kern.ipc.maxsockets=204800 kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=2097152 hw.intr_storm_threshold=9000

Re: Problem on re0

2011-12-17 Thread Sami Halabi
Hi, here is # pciconf -lv | grep -A4 bge\[0-9]\@ bge0@pci0:2:0:0:class=0x02 card=0x03781014 chip=0x165a14e4 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' device = 'Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5722 Gigabit (94309)' class = network subclass = ethernet --

Re: Problem on re0

2011-12-17 Thread Sami Halabi
updated sysctl: dev.bge.1.stats.FramesDroppedDueToFilters: 0 dev.bge.1.stats.DmaWriteQueueFull: 2291364 dev.bge.1.stats.DmaWriteHighPriQueueFull: 0 dev.bge.1.stats.NoMoreRxBDs: 0 dev.bge.1.stats.InputDiscards: 0 dev.bge.1.stats.InputErrors: 0 dev.bge.1.stats.RecvThresholdHit: 124125195

Re: Problem on re0

2011-12-08 Thread Sami Halabi
hi, i can see what it does. how do i compile the driver and load it instead of the running driver without restarting? its a production server. Thanks, Sami On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:58 AM, YongHyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 09:55:22AM +0200, Sami Halabi wrote: Hi,

Re: Problem on re0

2011-12-08 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:56:51AM +0200, Sami Halabi wrote: hi, i can see what it does. how do i compile the driver and load it instead of the running driver without restarting? its a production server. There is no such way. You have to rebuild/install kernel and reboot. Thanks, Sami

Re: Problem on re0

2011-12-08 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:52 PM, YongHyeon PYUN pyu...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:56:51AM +0200, Sami Halabi wrote: hi, i can see what it does. how do i compile the driver and load it instead of the running driver without restarting? its a production server. There is no

Re: Problem on re0

2011-12-07 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 09:55:22AM +0200, Sami Halabi wrote: Hi, the patch failed, As i see /usr/src/dev/re/if_re.c has the following at line 1943: if (rxstat RL_RDESC_STAT_RXERRSUM !(total_len 8191 (rxstat RL_RDESC_STAT_ERRS) ==

Re: Problem on re0

2011-12-06 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:53:03PM +0200, Sami Halabi wrote: Hi, Dmesg: re0: RealTek 8169/8169S/8169SB(L)/8110S/8110SB(L) Gigabit Ethernet port 0x9000-0x90ff mem 0xf400-0xf4ff irq 16 at device 6.0 on pci1 re0: Chip rev. 0x1000 re0: MAC rev. 0x miibus0: MII bus on re0

Re: Problem on re0

2011-12-06 Thread Sami Halabi
Hi, the patch failed, As i see /usr/src/dev/re/if_re.c has the following at line 1943: if (rxstat RL_RDESC_STAT_RXERRSUM !(total_len 8191 (rxstat RL_RDESC_STAT_ERRS) == RL_RDESC_STAT_GIANT)) { ifp-if_ierrors++;

Re: Problem on re0

2011-12-05 Thread Sami Halabi
Hi, Dmesg: re0: RealTek 8169/8169S/8169SB(L)/8110S/8110SB(L) Gigabit Ethernet port 0x9000-0x90ff mem 0xf400-0xf4ff irq 16 at device 6.0 on pci1 re0: Chip rev. 0x1000 re0: MAC rev. 0x miibus0: MII bus on re0 rgephy0: RTL8169S/8110S/8211B media interface PHY 1 on miibus0

Problem on re0

2011-12-04 Thread Sami Halabi
Hi, I have a desktop on which being used as a MPD server. the server isn't that loaded, and the cpu is highly idel 90-92% of the time. My problem is in the network card connected to the cables provider. in a random manner ot stops working whith no notice, and all l2tp/pptp users disconnect, also

Re: Problem on re0

2011-12-04 Thread Vladislav V. Prodan
04.12.2011 19:33, Sami Halabi wrote: here is the plot of lspci: Please, show the output: #pciconf -lv | grep -A4 re\[0-9]\@ -- Vladislav V. Prodan System Network Administrator http://support.od.ua +380 67 4584408, +380 99 4060508 VVP88-RIPE ___

Re: Problem on re0

2011-12-04 Thread Sami Halabi
Hi, %pciconf -lv | grep -A4 re\[0-9]\@ re0@pci0:1:6:0: class=0x02 card=0x816910ec chip=0x816910ec rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' device = 'Single Gigabit LOM Ethernet Controller (RTL8110)' class = network subclass = ethernet re1@pci0:1:7:0:

Re: Problem on re0

2011-12-04 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 07:33:01PM +0200, Sami Halabi wrote: Hi, I have a desktop on which being used as a MPD server. the server isn't that loaded, and the cpu is highly idel 90-92% of the time. My problem is in the network card connected to the cables provider. in a random manner ot stops

Problem with re0

2011-02-09 Thread Gabor Radnai
Both the em and re drivers have had a lot of work done recently. Are you trying with 8.2RC1 ? Tried with 8.2RC2 (via fixit shell with em): the same symptoms sadly. Card recognized, driver loaded as a result ifconfig reports it as available interface. Though neither static IP addressing nor

Re: Problem with re0

2011-02-05 Thread Zeus V Panchenko
Pyun YongHyeon (pyu...@gmail.com) [11.01.31 23:14] wrote: Then I have no idea. Does other OS work with your hardware without issues? As last resort, could you try vendor's FreeBSD driver? The vendor's driver applies a bunch of magic DSP fixups which re(4) does not have. I don't know whether

Re: Problem with re0

2011-01-31 Thread Zeus V Panchenko
Pyun YongHyeon (pyu...@gmail.com) [11.01.31 04:08] wrote: The RTL8168/8111D sample board I have does not show this kind of issue. This happens only when established link is 1000baseT, right? I slightly changed PHY's link detection code so would you try that patch at the following URL?

Re: Problem with re0

2011-01-31 Thread Milan Obuch
On Monday 31 January 2011 03:07:02 Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 05:15:10PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 02:53:15PM +0100, Milan Obuch wrote: On Sunday 30 January 2011 07:40:48 Zeus V Panchenko wrote: another detail for this nic dmidecode

Re: Problem with re0

2011-01-31 Thread Zeus V Panchenko
Milan Obuch (freebsd-...@dino.sk) [11.01.31 17:31] wrote: I checked my cables and one of them had bad pairing. Worked in 100 Mb mode, but not in 1 Gb mode. After I replaced it I check with flood ping, 1472 bytes packets again and no sign of problem here - one reply missing in almost 21

Re: Problem with re0

2011-01-31 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 02:15:09PM +0200, Zeus V Panchenko wrote: Pyun YongHyeon (pyu...@gmail.com) [11.01.31 04:08] wrote: The RTL8168/8111D sample board I have does not show this kind of issue. This happens only when established link is 1000baseT, right? I slightly changed PHY's link

Re: Problem with re0

2011-01-30 Thread Milan Obuch
On Sunday 30 January 2011 07:40:48 Zeus V Panchenko wrote: another detail for this nic dmidecode Base Board Information Manufacturer: ASUSTeK Computer INC. Product Name: AT5NM10-I Version: Rev x.0x Serial Number: MT7006K15200322 I did not followed this

Re: Problem with re0

2011-01-30 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 02:53:15PM +0100, Milan Obuch wrote: On Sunday 30 January 2011 07:40:48 Zeus V Panchenko wrote: another detail for this nic dmidecode Base Board Information Manufacturer: ASUSTeK Computer INC. Product Name: AT5NM10-I Version: Rev x.0x

Re: Problem with re0

2011-01-30 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 08:40:48AM +0200, Zeus V Panchenko wrote: another detail for this nic dmidecode Base Board Information Manufacturer: ASUSTeK Computer INC. Product Name: AT5NM10-I Version: Rev x.0x Serial Number: MT7006K15200322 uname -a FreeBSD

Re: Problem with re0

2011-01-30 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 05:15:10PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 02:53:15PM +0100, Milan Obuch wrote: On Sunday 30 January 2011 07:40:48 Zeus V Panchenko wrote: another detail for this nic dmidecode Base Board Information Manufacturer: ASUSTeK

Re: Problem with re0

2011-01-30 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 05:20:32PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 08:40:48AM +0200, Zeus V Panchenko wrote: another detail for this nic dmidecode Base Board Information Manufacturer: ASUSTeK Computer INC. Product Name: AT5NM10-I

Re: Problem with re0

2011-01-29 Thread Zeus V Panchenko
another detail for this nic dmidecode Base Board Information Manufacturer: ASUSTeK Computer INC. Product Name: AT5NM10-I Version: Rev x.0x Serial Number: MT7006K15200322 uname -a FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE amd64 system was cvsup-ed 2011.01.20 if_re.c,v 1.160.2.17

Re: Problem with re0

2011-01-21 Thread Zeus V Panchenko
Hi all, the same problem i wrote in the first posts about year ago :( onboard re(4) tremendous flapping while ( cable connects nic and switch ) { re0: link state changed to UP re0: link state changed to DOWN } here the details: dmidecode Base Board Information Manufacturer: ASUSTeK

Problem with re0

2011-01-02 Thread Gabor Radnai
The question has come up several times. What should be changed in re(4) to cover this? Well, if this question has come up several times a) it has a reason: same chip works for some but not for others b) description is not clear that driver is only supporting this chip if and when ... Anyhow, one

Re: Problem with re0

2011-01-02 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 1/2/2011 4:20 PM, Gabor Radnai wrote: The question has come up several times. What should be changed in re(4) to cover this? Both the em and re drivers have had a lot of work done recently. Are you trying with 8.2RC1 ? ---Mike ___

Problem with re0

2010-12-13 Thread Gabor Radnai
Realtek 8111 is not supported - that's the final conclusion? If so can this be made clear in re driver manual? Thanks. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: Problem with re0

2010-12-13 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Dec 13, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Gabor Radnai wrote: Realtek 8111 is not supported - that's the final conclusion? If so can this be made clear in re driver manual? At least some people have reported the Realtek 8111 working for them. This said, Realtek's older 10/100 NICs were infamous for being

Re: Problem with re0

2010-12-13 Thread Adam Vande More
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote: On Dec 13, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Gabor Radnai wrote: Realtek 8111 is not supported - that's the final conclusion? If so can this be made clear in re driver manual? At least some people have reported the Realtek 8111 working

Re: Problem with re0

2010-12-13 Thread Warren Block
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Gabor Radnai wrote: Realtek 8111 is not supported - that's the final conclusion? If so can this be made clear in re driver manual? r...@pci0:4:0:0:class=0x02 card=0x514c1462 chip=0x816810ec rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' device

Re: Problem with re0

2010-12-03 Thread Gabor Radnai
Hi, On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:56:42PM +0100, Gabor Radnai wrote: Hi, Could someone pls advise how to inject HEAD driver to stable release without full kernel rebuild (if possible)? If you have updated to

Problem with re0

2010-12-02 Thread Gabor Radnai
Hi, Could someone pls advise how to inject HEAD driver to stable release without full kernel rebuild (if possible)? I tried this way but found no assurance/evidence actually kernel using the new driver: 1. download full HEAD source with help of csup 2. in /usr/src/sys/modules/re did make install

Re: Problem with re0

2010-12-02 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:56:42PM +0100, Gabor Radnai wrote: Hi, Could someone pls advise how to inject HEAD driver to stable release without full kernel rebuild (if possible)? If you have updated to stable/8, the driver code would be the same. So need to replace driver with HEAD version.

Problem with em0 (was Re: Problem with re0)

2010-11-23 Thread Jay Borkenhagen
Just a me too to echo Gabor's request for guidance for checking out and using new drivers from HEAD. In my case I'd like to try the new em(4) Jack's been talking about. I've been running FreeBSD machines for several years, but this is the first time I've found myself having driver problems On

Re: Problem with re0

2010-11-18 Thread Gabor Radnai
re0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 options=389bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_UCAST,WOL_MCAST,WOL_MAGIC ether d8:5d:4c:80:b4:88 inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT

Re: Problem with re0

2010-11-15 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 09:09:18AM +0200, Zeus V Panchenko wrote: Pyun YongHyeon (pyu...@gmail.com) [10.11.13 01:01] wrote: Please be more specific for the issue. Your description is hard to narrow down possible cause. i was sure it is the problem of the onboard rt nics ...

Re: Problem with re0

2010-11-12 Thread Gabor Radnai
Hi, I hope you are interested in inet section it looks like this (will able to send the exact output only a bit later unfortunately as removed the card) : inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.255 Thanks, Gabor On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov

Re: Problem with re0

2010-11-12 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:18:40PM +0100, Gabor Radnai wrote: Hi, I hope you are interested in inet section it looks like this (will able to send the exact output only a bit later unfortunately as removed the card) : inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.255 This might be caused by

Re: Problem with re0

2010-11-12 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:07:59AM +0200, Zeus V Panchenko wrote: Hi, Gabor Radnai (gabor.rad...@gmail.com) [10.11.11 23:22] wrote: pciconf: n...@pci0:0:20:0:class=0x068000 card=0x816a1043 chip=0x026910de rev=0xa3 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' device =

Re: Problem with re0

2010-11-12 Thread Zeus V Panchenko
Pyun YongHyeon (pyu...@gmail.com) [10.11.13 01:01] wrote: Please be more specific for the issue. Your description is hard to narrow down possible cause. i was sure it is the problem of the onboard rt nics ... pciconf output of all re(4) controllers are useless because the vendor

Re: Problem with re0

2010-11-11 Thread Zeus V Panchenko
Hi, Gabor Radnai (gabor.rad...@gmail.com) [10.11.11 23:22] wrote: pciconf: n...@pci0:0:20:0:class=0x068000 card=0x816a1043 chip=0x026910de rev=0xa3 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' device = 'MCP51 Network Bus Enumerator' class = bridge r...@pci0:1:0:0: