On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 05:51:28PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 23:45:28 +0200, Vincent Jardin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I agree, then... Isn't it already the purpose of RTF_CLONING ?
When should RTF_PRCLONIG be set ?
RTF_PRCLONING is set automatically by the protocol
Hello,
Any hopes for anything like a pptpd (like the pppoed)
any time soon ? , discussion stopped in the thread
so maybe you guys discussed this further privately
and decided something ?
pptpd is a much needed feature nowdays.
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 23:00:45 -0600
Brett Glass [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In netgraph(4) it is said that:
In both directions, (request and response)
it is up to the receiver of that message to free() the control mes-
sage buffer. All control messages and replies are allocated with
malloc() type M_NETGRAPH.
Does this mean that
Hello.
I've got a production server which keeps crashing if I use bpfs to much.
I usually only use bpf0 for dhcp server, but if I start e.g. snort and ntop, the
machine will soon reboot. The same
happens if I run tcpdump.
uname -a gives:
FreeBSD x..zz 4.7-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 07:13:04PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
If you want to send me the node you have writen I can
make the diffs and send it back :-)
thanks Julian, but i prefer to do it myself,
cause i want to understand how the hell netgraph works... =)
btw, i think i did the
hi, there!
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 12:30:42PM +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote:
And while you are listening, i can show u something else... =)
I have NETGRAPH in my kernel, and this is what i get when i
try to load ng_ether the first time:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# kldload ng_ether
Hi Folks,
I verified my network traffic using tcpdump.
I have 3 sub-net. In the past i used one switch per sub-net. The broadcast
were genereted for PC's inside your sub-net.
I need to created VLANS in one switch and attach the 3 sub-nets. Now the
broadcasts are genereted of all PC's to all
Here is my patch for this. I've added the new settings to uipc_socket2.c
instead of subr_param.c because they need to be initialized with maxsockets
to keep the current behavior by default.
This patch adds four new tunable vars:
kern.ipc.maxripcb - maximum number of raw pcbs
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 12:30:42PM +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote:
btw, i think i did the converion and it was quite straightforward,
but i've still a little problem that i didn't have in 5.x:
if i try to unload my module, change the internals, compile
and use it again, it fails! =P
I
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 04:16:41PM +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote:
well, i answer to myself:
it seems it's not my mistake, cause you can trigger it with a
plain original tee node too. =P
Ok, i promise this is the last msg:
it was my mistake, whe i deleted the tee node, the ether
node short
** Reply to note from Olivier Nicole [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:56:30
+0700 (ICT)
since it is connected to a full-duplex switch.
Is the port set to full-duplex? Or to auto configuration?
There is no such options: it's always using Auto-Negotiation.
If the last, the default is to
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Paolo Pisati wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 04:16:41PM +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote:
well, i answer to myself:
it seems it's not my mistake, cause you can trigger it with a
plain original tee node too. =P
Ok, i promise this is the last msg:
it was my
Christophe Prevotaux wrote:
Any hopes for anything like a pptpd (like the pppoed)
any time soon ? , discussion stopped in the thread
so maybe you guys discussed this further privately
and decided something ?
Not really.. from my point of view, unfortunately I don't have time
to work on mpd
On Friday 18 July 2003 21:24, Van Vinh Vo wrote:
i am working the research about the network of freeBSD
i want knowing the developpement of BSD4.4 life
comparing the 4.3 BSD.
I've explained to you several times these historical questions are not
appropriate for the freebsd-net mailing list.
** Reply to note from Sreekanth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:53:05 -0700
Ok, so I tried:
ifconfig xl0 mediaopt autoselect
but I get:
ifconfig: SIOCSIFMEDIA: Device not configured
Try
ifconfig xl0 media auto
Ditto. I get the same message.
bye Thanks
On Monday 28 July 2003 05:33 pm, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hi, we recently bought a fully supported SysKonnect 9821 adapter,
but it claims to be V2.0. I can't find any docs anywhere on this
extra feature but the card does not detect under either a
standard kernel or one with the sk
** Reply to note from Sreekanth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:53:05 -0700
Ok, so I tried:
ifconfig xl0 mediaopt autoselect
but I get:
ifconfig: SIOCSIFMEDIA: Device not configured
Try
ifconfig xl0 media auto
Ditto. I get the same message.
bye
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Jason Hunt wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 06:14:29PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering how to modify the appropriate files to setup a FreeBSD
computer to act as a NAT Router, that would do the following:
Check the natd(8) man page, it should give you
Cristophe:
Nothing was decided in private e-mail. I'd really like to go for this,
but will likely need some help analyzing the existing code, abstracting
the right parts from pppoed and mpd, and gluing everything together.
That's why I was hoping to ask Archie and Brian for help. The code for
Hello!
Help!! I'm running a PC with dual NICs and FreeBSD 4.8 for a bridged
firewall. I've got a private IP 10.0.0.1 tied to the internal card on the
box for remote management. The firewall blocks any 10.x traffic coming in on
the external card, so to remotely admin it, I have to shell into a
Per a list members request, I've attached dumps of the following commands:
arp -a
netstat -m
ipfw show
ifconfig
netstat -s
netstat -i
One caveat, I've hidden all IP addresses that could be used to divine my
netblock... I guess I'm a little paranoid about people inspecting my
firewall
From: William Knechtel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think you need to allow arp through this device, something
like:
ipfw add 30 allow layer2 mac-type arp
[not sure which rule to insert it at].
I'm guessing your arp cache is timing out.
___
[EMAIL
** Reply to note from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Paul) Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:18:33 -0700
(PDT)
If your switch is not managed and doesn't allow you to manually
configure the port settings, then you're out of luck. You'll just
have to live with half duplex mode.
Sigh: this is the case. :(
Well,
23 matches
Mail list logo
