Kris Kennaway wrote:
Unfortunately it doesn't DTRT with files terminated with DOS-style CRLF
(e.g. devel/p5-Tie-Restore, others).
First, I certainly would not have any problem with a policy that says
files in ports shouldn't have CRLF line endings. Second, I am sure we
could probably do
Since this subject has been discussed recently, I want to tell my
observations.
I played a bit with INDEX_JOBS environment variable, and I found that
for my notebook
the best value is 8. The limiting factor seems to be grep'ing for
libssl through
packages. I believe this is easy to reproduce,
Doug Barton wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
The new 'make describe' target runs entirely using shell builtins
apart from the need to sed pkg-descr to extract the WWW [2]
[2] Actually I am not happy with this but couldn't think of a way to
do it better. Having to fork the subshell costs about
Pietro Cerutti wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Kris Kennaway wrote:
| **
| * NOTE TO PORT DEVELOPERS
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Kris Kennaway wrote:
| Pietro Cerutti wrote:
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA512
|
| Kris Kennaway wrote:
|
| | **
| | * NOTE TO PORT DEVELOPERS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Kris Kennaway wrote:
| **
| * NOTE TO PORT DEVELOPERS
| **
|
|
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 04:49:18PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
The new 'make describe' target runs entirely using shell
builtins apart from the need to sed pkg-descr to extract the WWW [2]
[2] Actually I am not happy with this but couldn't think of a way to do
it
Alex Kozlov wrote:
Good idea. I also do something like that [1]. But before we can use this
method, we have to fix ports with bad pkg-descr:
Yeah, in a brief glance at Kris' sed routines I would think at least
some of this work would have to be done no matter what (and it should be
done
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:22:18AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Alex Kozlov wrote:
Good idea. I also do something like that [1]. But before we can use this
method, we have to fix ports with bad pkg-descr:
Yeah, in a brief glance at Kris' sed routines I would think at least
some of this
Please review and test the following patches that optimize port INDEX
builds (and as a side-effect, other recursive tree traversals). I am
particularly interested in a comparison between old and new indexes
built locally: the only diff should be in audio/festvox-hvs [1].
The patches remove
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Kris Kennaway wrote:
| Another important optimization is to use /rescue/sh instead of /bin/sh
| for index builds. The former is statically linked and this is much
| faster to execute.
True, but the for is not even guaranteed to exist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Pietro Cerutti wrote:
| Kris Kennaway wrote:
|
| | Another important optimization is to use /rescue/sh instead of /bin/sh
| | for index builds. The former is statically linked and this is much
| | faster to execute.
|
| True, but the for is not
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:45:32 -0500, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another important optimization is to use /rescue/sh instead of /bin/sh
for index builds. The former is statically linked and this is much
faster to execute.
I don't have INDEX in all of my systems, so I am only
Pietro Cerutti wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Pietro Cerutti wrote:
| Kris Kennaway wrote:
|
| | Another important optimization is to use /rescue/sh instead of /bin/sh
| | for index builds. The former is statically linked and this is much
| | faster to execute.
|
|
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:45:32 -0500, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another important optimization is to use /rescue/sh instead of /bin/sh
for index builds. The former is statically linked and this is much
faster to execute.
I don't have INDEX in all of my
Alex Kozlov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 06:45:32PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Please review and test the following patches that optimize port INDEX
builds (and as a side-effect, other recursive tree traversals). I am
particularly interested in a comparison between old and new indexes
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:52:01PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Alex Kozlov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 06:45:32PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Please review and test the following patches that optimize port INDEX
builds (and as a side-effect, other recursive tree traversals). I am
Alex Kozlov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:52:01PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Alex Kozlov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 06:45:32PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Please review and test the following patches that optimize port INDEX
builds (and as a side-effect, other recursive tree
Kris Kennaway wrote:
The new 'make describe' target runs entirely using shell
builtins apart from the need to sed pkg-descr to extract the WWW [2]
[2] Actually I am not happy with this but couldn't think of a way to do
it better. Having to fork the subshell costs about 60 seconds of system
19 matches
Mail list logo
