On 2020-May-11, at 11:34, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> I’m confused by this thread. isn’t the point of Poudriere
> bulk builds to
When I listed:
# poudriere jail -l
JAILNAME VERSION ARCH METHOD TIMESTAMP PATH
FBSDFSSDjail 13.0-CURRENT amd64
Hi all,
I’m confused by this thread. isn’t the point of Poudriere
bulk builds to
- start with a clean jail
- build the first port in the list and all dependencies
- store the packages for later incorporation into the pkg repo
- clean out the jail completely
- start with the next port in the list
Leander Schaefer info at NetOcean.de wrote on
Tue May 5 20:38:49 UTC 2020 :
> I have been dealing with Poudriere for quite a while and one of the most
> issues I have is, that I have ports which won't compile along with
> another. Reason is mostly something like:
>
> pkg-static:
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 08:39:41PM +0200, Leander Schaefer wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> Hello List,
>
> I have checked out ports-mgmt/synth unfortunately it would be a massive
> downgrade compared to poudriere. Does anyone have the right clue about how
> the FreeBSD package managment team provides
On Thu, 7 May 2020 20:39:41 +0200 Leander Schaefer i...@netocean.de said
Hello Chris,
Hello List,
I have checked out ports-mgmt/synth unfortunately it would be a massive
downgrade compared to poudriere. Does anyone have the right clue about
how the FreeBSD package managment team provides a
## Leander Schaefer (i...@netocean.de):
> Does anyone have the right clue about
> how the FreeBSD package managment team provides a complete repository
> without having these conflicts? There must be a way to do this with
> poudriere since I am most certainly sure they also use poudriere.
Hello Chris,
Hello List,
I have checked out ports-mgmt/synth unfortunately it would be a massive
downgrade compared to poudriere. Does anyone have the right clue about
how the FreeBSD package managment team provides a complete repository
without having these conflicts? There must be a way to
Hello Chris,
thanks for your reply. Thanks for the hint about ports-mgmt/synth. I am
definitly going to have a look into this! Well, my Podriere is using
Jails by default. Is there any hack you applied for this issue to avoid?
Best regards,
Leander
Am 05.05.20 um 22:46 schrieb Chris:
On Tue, 5 May 2020 22:38:36 +0200 Leander Schaefer i...@netocean.de said
Hello,
I have been dealing with Poudriere for quite a while and one of the most
issues I have is, that I have ports which won't compile along with
another. Reason is mostly something like:
pkg-static:
