Peter Jeremy wrote:
Firstly, I have jdk-1.5.0.14p8,1 installed and this needs updating.
portmaster has decided that doing so requires java/diablo-jdk15 to be
installed - which is wrong because I already have a suitable jdk
installed.
You are right, but the port has the following line:
Since this subject has been discussed recently, I want to tell my
observations.
I played a bit with INDEX_JOBS environment variable, and I found that
for my notebook
the best value is 8. The limiting factor seems to be grep'ing for
libssl through
packages. I believe this is easy to reproduce,
When I try to update to pkg_install-20080530 I get errors in the build.
Version: 4.10
GCC: 2.95.3
cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized
-Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow
-Wnon-const-format
Hi all.
Perhaps someone can share his wisdom with me. I just installed security/gnupg
and tried to create a key pair using gpg --gen-key. After issuing the command
gnupg barfed at me that pinentry could not be started. Now I wonder why pinentry
is not a dependency of gpg as it seems to rely on
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our experience has shown that it is very common for tests to succeed
when run by the maintainer, but to fail in the package cluster
environment because of differences in the environment, configuration,
default assumptions, etc. i.e. the regression
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 08:10:28 -0500, Jim Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I try to update to pkg_install-20080530 I get errors in the build.
Version: 4.10
GCC: 2.95.3
We (FreeBSD project) no longer support FreeBSD 4.x. Time for you to
upgrade your FreeBSD to 7.x.
Cheers,
Mezz
cc -O
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:25:56 +0200
Tobias Rehbein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps someone can share his wisdom with me. I just installed security/gnupg
and tried to create a key pair using gpg --gen-key. After issuing the
command
gnupg barfed at me that pinentry could not be started. Now I
Doug Barton wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
The new 'make describe' target runs entirely using shell builtins
apart from the need to sed pkg-descr to extract the WWW [2]
[2] Actually I am not happy with this but couldn't think of a way to
do it better. Having to fork the subshell costs about
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:12:16PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote:
Hi!
I've been playing with a qemu-devel update again recently (which also
includes a kqemu api change, therefore I have a new kqemu-kmod-devel
port too), and these are the main news:
- Many targets including x86 have been
