Re: portupgrade - portmaster Rosetta Stone?

On 03/03/12 12:23, Kurt Jaeger wrote: The script that does this uses: portupgrade -arR -m BATCH=yes Hi Kurt Wouldn't portupgrade -a do exactly the same as -arR since -a affects all ports that have been updated and so by definition will build *updated* dependencies as well? Regards

Re: Why does Samba requires 777 permissions on /tmp

On 05/19/13 20:56, Bob Eager wrote: On Sun, 19 May 2013 13:34:49 -0500 sindrome sindr...@gmail.com wrote: can't authenticate to my samba server. There has to be a root of this problem to make them both work. Is there some other place portupgrade is having /tmp amended on without it being in

Re: Why does Samba requires 777 permissions on /tmp

On 20/05/2013 15:38, Bob Eager wrote: On Mon, 20 May 2013 08:03:09 -0500 sindrome sindr...@gmail.com wrote: What I think is happening is that portupgrade is building and running shell scripts in /tmp. It's running them with (in ruby): system('/tmp/script') [roughly] The ruby

Maintainer timeout: security patch, ports/188945 (www/drupal6)

Would any committer be able to look at the captioned patch for www/drupal6? This is a security update that has been pending since 24 April. Many thanks Simon Wright. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

pkg aparently not respecting subversion make.conf settings

. Can anyone offer any suggestions to let me build a package of portdowngrade that uses my desired version of subversion or see what I've done wrong? Thanks! Simon Wright. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Re: pkg aparently not respecting subversion make.conf settings

On 10/06/2014 18:50, Mikhail Tsatsenko wrote: 2014-06-10 20:31 GMT+04:00 Simon Wright simon.wri...@gmx.net: Hi all I've recently set up poudriere and pkg on a 9.2 amd64 box. This has worked well for the last month or so. However I have just tried to downgrade subversion to 1.7x from 1.8x

Re: pkg aparently not respecting subversion make.conf settings

On 10/06/2014 19:45, Scot Hetzel wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Simon Wright simon.wri...@gmx.net wrote: Hi all I've recently set up poudriere and pkg on a 9.2 amd64 box. This has worked well for the last month or so. However I have just tried to downgrade subversion to 1.7x from

Re: pkg aparently not respecting subversion make.conf settings

On 10/06/2014 22:35, olli hauer wrote: On 2014-06-10 22:01, Simon Wright wrote: On 10/06/2014 19:45, Scot Hetzel wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Simon Wright simon.wri...@gmx.net wrote: Hi all I've recently set up poudriere and pkg on a 9.2 amd64 box. This has worked well

Re: pkg aparently not respecting subversion make.conf settings

On 11/06/2014 00:19, olli hauer wrote: On 2014-06-11 00:02, Simon Wright wrote: On 10/06/2014 22:35, olli hauer wrote: ... poudriere bulk -j freebsd:9:x86:64 -C ports-mgmt/portdowngrade portdowngrade is removed from the repo and then the rebuild begins: : .. Not easy to tell since we

Re: Unable to build graphics/ImageMagick port

On 20/06/12 06:22, Kevin Oberman wrote: For this to work, install ImageMagick WITH HDRI, The test that fails is for HDRI and attempts to use files that don't yet exist. Thus analyze.sh failes. To install ImageMagick with all default options, turn on HDRI (High Dynamic Range), a very desirable

Re: Ports make fetchindex still getting outdated INDEX-9

On 01/01/13 23:07, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote: On 14 December 2012 13:08, Jim Pingleli...@pingle.org wrote: On 13 Dec 2012 16:57, Jim Pingle wrote: I saw a thread last month about the servers that build INDEX files being down since the security incident - is that still the case?

Re: [CFT] SSP Package Repository available

the same make.conf setting for about two months and have seen no issues there either. I have just updated my pkg configuration to use the new repository and have reinstalled all official packages. Regards, Simon Wright. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

Any update planned for www/mod_log_sql2

of any time line or migration path would be much appreciated! Many thanks. Simon Wright. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr

[Resolved] Re: Any update planned for www/mod_log_sql2

On 06/09/2014 19:36, Patrick Powell wrote: On 09/06/14 02:05, Simon Wright wrote: I was wondering whether mod_log_sql2 will be or can be updated to work with the new default of Apache24? Apache22 is specified explictly in the Makefile. I'm not sure whether mod_log_mysql is a replacement

Bug 192099 - [security][patch] www/drupal7: update to 7.31

Hi all Could we get a maintainer timeout on this security patch for Drupal 7 and get it committed please? Patch was originally submitted on 2014-07-24, updated on 2014-08-07. Thanks Simon. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Security patches for Drupal 6 and 7: upgrades to 6.34 7.34 respectively

Hi all I have submitted patches for the latest Drupal security vulnerability on 6 7, would a committer be able to take a look at them? Patches are: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195254 and https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195257 Poudriere build logs are

Re: Tracking Binary Ports/Pkgs Tree

Seconded. This has been an issue for me this weekend with the perl default changing to 5.18 and the gettext port split but the packages in the FreeBSD repo are still using the old default for perl and the old version for gettext whereas my local repo (with custom options) are using the new

ports-mgmt/portshaker: Maintainer timeout [patch]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195740 Would anyone be able to have a look at this bug to allow portshaker to use either subversion 1.7 or 1.8 depending on the setting of WITH_SUBVERSION_VER in make.conf. It's been open for 3 weeks now. Regards Simon Wright

Security patch for Drupal 6/7 needed

Hi all I am the maintainer of Drupal 6 7. Upstrem have just released a moderately critical security update but I am travelling with no access to my systems. If someone can quickly write and test a patch I will approve it. There are a couple of points listed on the release notes but nothing

Re: Synchronising ports with package cluster

On 12/04/2015 18:50, Mike Clarke wrote: Sounds like it would be a useful feature but in the meantime could anyone point me to where I can find the SVN revision used by the ports cluster when building for 101amd64-default? It used to be on beefy2.isc.freebsd.org/#latest_builds but that now only

www/drupal6 www/drupal7: Security patches submitted (bugs 200956 200957)

thanks, Simon Wright. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Bug 215153: sysutils/apcupsd, change default options to enable SNMP driver

Hi all, I requested this change to sysutils/apcupsd so that it will be possible to access/control/monitor UPS's across the network out of the box. At present due to the SNMP driver not being enabled in the default settings this is not possible. The maintainer has not responded to the bug or

Re: Poudriere package builds for 101amd64-default have not run since 1-Jan-2017

On 14/01/2017 15:26, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Le 14/01/2017 à 05:57, Simon Wright a écrit : Hi all I sync my local ports tree to the same release as is used to build packages. Checking my logs and the logs on beefy6 which is/was the Has anything changed with the build system or are there issues

Poudriere package builds for 101amd64-default have not run since 1-Jan-2017

or are there issues? There are a few security issues in r430183 which I guess are fixed in more current revisions. We are currently at r431456 for the ports tree. If anyone has any info or links to updates or changes . . . . Cheers, Simon Wright. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic

Re: gettng the port revision number associated with the pkg repo.

On 02/10/2017 22:19, Julian Elischer wrote: On 28/9/17 9:25 pm, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Julian Elischer writes: On 26/9/17 10:07 pm, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Julian Elischer writes: SO imagine that I needed to be ab;e to reproduce the pkg repo as of a

Re: Updating poudriere jail

pkg repro on any jail updates. -- Simon Wright. -- Simon Wright Public key: http://www.santos-wright.net/pki/publickey.gpg smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: pkg feature request

On 12/08/2020 5:51 am, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote: On 8/11/20 9:39 PM, Mike Clarke wrote: On Sunday, 9 August 2020 17:27:01 BST RW via freebsd-ports wrote: What I'd like to see is a simple way to update the ports tree to match what was used to build the current packages in the repository.

Re: Problem building py-cryptography

:17 pm, Simon Wright wrote: On 20/05/2021 12:00 pm, Kubilay Kocak wrote: On 20/05/2021 1:21 pm, Simon Wright wrote: Hi all, I've been unable to build security/py-cryptography for about 10 days now. The build in Poudriere under 12.2 and 13.0 fail with a "Bad_C++_code" error. I trie

Re: Problem building py-cryptography

:17 pm, Simon Wright wrote: On 20/05/2021 12:00 pm, Kubilay Kocak wrote: On 20/05/2021 1:21 pm, Simon Wright wrote: Hi all, I've been unable to build security/py-cryptography for about 10 days now. The build in Poudriere under 12.2 and 13.0 fail with a "Bad_C++_code" error. I trie

Problem building py-cryptography

the right direction to get this fixed please? Below is my make.conf, list of poudriere-built ports and the full poudriere log for py-cryptography Thanks, Simon Wright. make.conf WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/tmp OPTIONS_SET=GECKO CUPS NOI4B=1 OPTIONS_S

Re: Problem building py-cryptography

On 20/05/2021 12:00 pm, Kubilay Kocak wrote: On 20/05/2021 1:21 pm, Simon Wright wrote: Hi all, I've been unable to build security/py-cryptography for about 10 days now. The build in Poudriere under 12.2 and 13.0 fail with a "Bad_C++_code" error. I tried removing the libressl

Re: Additional filtering on pkg-status.freebsd.org url

Totally perfect. Thank you Michael :). On 08/05/2021 5:53 pm, Michael Gmelin wrote: On Sat, 8 May 2021 17:46:03 +0800 Simon Wright wrote: Hi all, The move to git for ports is more or less OK for me now, thanks to several for the various pointers. I still have issues with accessing

Additional filtering on pkg-status.freebsd.org url

that I'm interested in. Is this possible? Encoding AND Search='130amd64' in the URL does not work. Can anyone point me in the right direction for this? Thanks, Simon Wright. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Re: Problem building py-cryptography

On 20/05/2021 12:00 pm, Kubilay Kocak wrote: On 20/05/2021 1:21 pm, Simon Wright wrote: Hi all, I've been unable to build security/py-cryptography for about 10 days now. The build in Poudriere under 12.2 and 13.0 fail with a "Bad_C++_code" error. I tried removing the libressl

Re: Problem building py-cryptography

On 20/05/2021 12:32 pm, Kubilay Kocak wrote: On 20/05/2021 2:17 pm, Simon Wright wrote: On 20/05/2021 12:00 pm, Kubilay Kocak wrote: On 20/05/2021 1:21 pm, Simon Wright wrote: Hi all, I've been unable to build security/py-cryptography for about 10 days now. The build in Poudriere under

Bug 242248 - misc/compat11x pkg-descr correction [PATCH], committer love pls!

Hi all, Would any committer with a few spare cycles please look at the correction to the pkg-descr in compat11x? It's a very minor issue but so quick to fix :). https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242248 Thanks, Simon. ___

Re: misc/compat11x pkg-descr correction

Thank you for checking this Adriaan. On 27/04/2021 6:20 pm, Adriaan de Groot wrote: On Tuesday, 27 April 2021 11:23:51 CEST freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org wrote: From: Simon Wright To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Bug 242248 - misc/compat11x pkg-descr correction [PATCH

Specific svn/git package update use case

using svn works. My apologies if I've missed this in the discussion or referenced docs and thanks for any guidance or pointers. Simon Wright. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubs

Re: Specific svn/git package update use case

: Could not read from remote repository. Thanks, Simon. On 04/04/2021 10:30 am, Simon Wright wrote: Hi all, I've been following the discussion about the git upgrade to the ports repro but am not clear about how it impacts my use case. At the moment I track ports on the revision that the Freebsd

Re: Specific svn/git package update use case

Thank you. I had to delete and recreate the repro as non-shallow to get the commit history but once done then I could find the commit and update to it. Follow-up: I'm still not clear though whether checking out this commit brings in all the commits from git clone to this one or only this commit.

Re: Specific svn/git package update use case

. That is trivial to feed to my script though I do have a couple of other questions which I raised further down the thread. On 09/04/2021 11:08 am, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: On 4/04/2021 12:30 pm, Simon Wright wrote: Hi all, I've been following the discussion about the git upgrade to the ports repro but am

Re: Specific svn/git package update use case

so there is nothing unique in my /usr/ports and I only track main, no other branches. On 09/04/2021 1:23 pm, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports wrote: Simon Wright simon.wright at gmx.net wrote on Fri Apr 9 02:48:47 UTC 2021 : I'm still not clear though whether checking out this commit brings

Re: Specific svn/git package update use case

Great, that answers all my questions thank you very much! Just need to wait for the package build process to run again (the last status for 122amd64-default was stoped: crashed:) so that I can test properly. On 10/04/2021 1:20 am, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports wrote: Simon Wright simon.wright

Re: Access to detailed status info on package build servers

On 14/04/2021 2:46 pm, Ronald Klop wrote: Van: Kevin Oberman Datum: 14 april 2021 08:31 Aan: Simon Wright CC: FreeBSD Ports ML Onderwerp: Re: Access to detailed status info on package build servers On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:02 PM Simon Wright wrote: > Hi all, > > > I

Access to detailed status info on package build servers

-04-10 01:01 Elapsed 99:04:36 SVN Or is it possible to return the access permissions for this server/directory/file to what they were last week? Thanks for any guidance. Simon Wright. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org