Hi,
I have a KZPSC (Mylex DAC960) and it displays a message the firmware is
outdated. I have tried to use flash the generic DAC960 firmware, but it fails
to load. Does somebody know where to get an updated version of the firmware.
I have searched on the COMPAQ web site, but couldn't find it.
Hi!
In addition, does anyone have a preference on the use of a pop3/imap
setup for a mail server?
Well, you've opened the can of worms :-)
It is my understanding that UW-IMAP is not the best possible IMAP
server out there. I've read about lots of security problems with it in
the past.
Any other applications that can acts as a web-based POP3 client?
IMP. http://horde.org/imp/
Most people use it with IMAP, but it can also be used with POP3.
--
Toomas Aas | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.raad.tartu.ee/~toomas/
* It's better to be rich and healthy than poor and sick.
To
On Dec 27 Didier Wiroth wrote:
I'm using a windows client, putty where I didn't find that kind of option,
here is the output of ssh -v from linux test machine:
OpenSSH_2.9.9p2, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090601f
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
debug1: Applying
Having installed Horde, Imp and Turba, --clean
install, no config files edited yet-- apachectl
configtest gives:
Processing config directory: /usr/local/etc/horde
Processing config file:
/usr/local/etc/horde/httpd.conf.horde
Processing config file:
/usr/local/etc/horde/httpd.conf.imp
[This is a resend. Ironically, the orignal was blocked by FreeBSD's spam
filter, I've had to send this from another account]
I am not sure which list is best for this issue, hence the cross
posting. I believe spam and anti-spam measures are security issues --
the 'Availability' part of C-I-A.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(12.28.2002 @ 0227 PST): Toomas Aas said, in 0.7K:
In addition, does anyone have a preference on the use of a pop3/imap
setup for a mail server?
It is my understanding that UW-IMAP is not the best possible IMAP
server out there. I've
Mail sent from my main server, gatehouse.quadtelecom.com (66.45.116.138)
gets rejected.
_450_Client_host_rejected:_cannot_find_your_hostname,_[66.45.116.138]
What are the rules for sending mail! I'm not a spammer -- I've
never sent spam!!! Your rejection is very disconcerting.
Harry
Harry Tabak wrote:
Mail sent from my main server, gatehouse.quadtelecom.com
(66.45.116.138) gets rejected.
_450_Client_host_rejected:_cannot_find_your_hostname,_[66.45.116.138]
What are the rules for sending mail! I'm not a spammer -- I've
never sent spam!!! Your rejection is very
WOULD YOU LIKE TO HAVE YOUR MESSAGE SEEN BY OVER
15.1 MILLION TARGETED PROSPECTS DAILY?
Below contains all the information you will ever need to market your product or
service on the Internet.
If you have a product, service, or message that you would like to get out
to Thousands, Hundreds of
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Harry Tabak wrote:
I recently discovered, and quite by accident, that a FreeBSD ported
package -- spambnc (aka Spambouncer or SB) -- was blocking mail from
me to an unknown number of businesses and individuals on the
internet.
More precisely, people who have chosen to
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 05:54:50 -0800
Adam Weinberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I use courier-imapd with SquirrelMail, and it rocks. It doesn't knock
my socks off when it's using really large directories, though. I save
every porn spam I get (dunno why... I get about 50/day), and it takes
my
There's not much you can do but what you already are doing. Complain.
You complain to the people using the software, and if they can't
configure it, they will probably stop using it if they care.
You complain to the people that actually wrote the software. Usually found
in the source code and
After using the custom software provided here at Penn State, and, uhm,
finding it lacking (Please restore from backup. You'll have to tell
us when it failed ?!?!?!), I need to find some simple, presumably
apache-based, web software to run on my workstation.
There will not be more than 70 students
From: Harry Tabak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is so crazy I had to respond.
My tiny x/29 block is sub-allocated from my DSL provider's x/23 block.
The DSL provider's block is a sub-allocation from Inflow.com's
66.45.0.0/17 block. Spambouncer doesn't like Inflow. While they have a
right to
Subject: Re: Bystander shot by a spam filter.
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:19:32 -0600 (CST)
From: Chuck Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Harry Tabak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's not much you can do but what you already are doing. Complain.
You complain to the
Hello,
This is my festive season question.
I was having some problems with my SMTP mail connection to my ISP.
So I tcpdump'ed the ethernet ADSL connection.
I think I know what most of it means, but can anyone tell me what
the following messages, every 2 seconds mean ?
It is not a problem, I just
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 14:50:54 +0100
From: rocky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: rocky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harry Tabak wrote:
Mail sent from my main server, gatehouse.quadtelecom.com
(66.45.116.138) gets rejected.
my business is main on biological and genetic field ,not computer or internet,
internet business is just for my interest only..
I main live on social assistance, so i don't care if i have no money or not , i only
busy about my research on biological and chemical study ,
i hope before i die ,
This is not all that surprising
The behavior you are talking about, blocking entire isp's and blocks of
ips, is the same as the other service you mentioned earlier, SPEWS.
SPEWS has blocked 2 entire c-classes at my isp, preventing my company
from sending mail to many large email sites, like
I've looked for a good set of working examples of packeting forwarding
using ipfw, but no luck yet. I'm wondering if the following rule would work
for sending packets received on the gateway to a machine on the internal
network (LAN)...???
# ipfw add fwd tcp from 65.xxx.zzz.yyy to 192.168.0.5
Does anyone have any URLs that explain the order in which the following
occur:
1. an outbound packet is NATed, encapsulated by ESP, and compared to an
ipfw ruleset
2. the same as above, except for an inbound packet
3. the same as both above, except for an ipf ruleset
I remember coming
Hey,
I've been trying to get X running on a laptop with a Silicon Motion
SM710 LynxEM.
When I startx I get a brief flash on the screen (two vertical lines)
but these soon disappear and I am unable to do anything (even
CTRL+ALT+F1) other than SSH in and kill -9 X.
pciconf shows it as:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 08:53:15AM -0500, Harry Tabak wrote:
Mail sent from my main server, gatehouse.quadtelecom.com (66.45.116.138)
gets rejected.
_450_Client_host_rejected:_cannot_find_your_hostname,_[66.45.116.138]
What are the rules for sending mail! I'm not a spammer -- I've
Easier said than done. I've been assigned 66.45.116.136/29 by the ISP.
.136 is not a power of 2 which is required for classless reverse
delegation. It should be .132/29 or .140/29
I control DNS for quadtelecom.com, but I don't control the reverse
lookup. I'd like to know the exact
On Thursday, December 26, 2002, at 06:01 PM, Keith Spencer wrote:
What does your /var/log/qmail/current file say?
$tail -f /var/log/qmail/current | tai64nlocal
Brian...I dont have such a /var/log/qmail/current
beast!
:(
Look in your /var/qmail directory for a subdirectory called
Today Harry Tabak wrote:
Mail sent from my main server, gatehouse.quadtelecom.com (66.45.116.138)
gets rejected.
_450_Client_host_rejected:_cannot_find_your_hostname,_[66.45.116.138]
If 450 is some error code, then it's only a _temporary_ error/failure
(RFC 1893). Maybe the DNS servers
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 10:15:21 +0700, dodi agusri wrote:
I use USER PPP to connect to internet . what is the
command to display the current
Speed of my modem ?
Thank fo reply.
cat /var/log/ppp.log | grep CONNECT
and look at the last one
---
doug reynolds | the maverick | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 11:09:12AM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
I've looked for a good set of working examples of packeting forwarding
using ipfw, but no luck yet. I'm wondering if the following rule would work
for sending packets received on the gateway to a machine on the internal
network
Hi,
I have an IPFILTER firewall that, ideally, should not
allow any arbitrary outgoing connections. So right
now, I only allow 25, 80 and 21. The machine itself
is behind one more firewall (at least temporarily)
so that I can't do active ftp even if the IPFILTER
does any kind of proxying.
Is
Someone, quite probably Harry Tabak, once wrote:
From: Chuck Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's not much you can do but what you already are doing. Complain.
You complain to the people using the software, and if they can't
configure it, they will probably stop using it if they care.
I know only
lewiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've just got a 3C589 PCCARD NIC going. However, I'm using the BNC
(10Base2) connector so I need to specify ``media 10base2/BNC'' in
rc.conf. However, if I do this DHCP doesn't seem to work. Is there any
way that I can combine media 10base2/BNC and DHCP
I am having some strange problems with detection of my ata hard drive, first here is
my system config.
Asus A7V8X, AMD 2000 512mb DDR400 ram, Geforce4 Ti4200 video, Adaptec 29160, Seagate
18gig LVD,
WD31600 HDD on primary, Lite-on cd-rw secondary master, Memorex cd-rom secondary slave.
Hey folks,
I'm noticing some odd behaviour with the linux compatability
recently. I have this small gnome app called gnome-run. It links against
a number of gnome libraries that I've copied from my linux partition over
to /compat/linux and put in the appropriate directories.
Lets say I have 2 freebsd instances installed on a box.
partition 1 contains one system, and partition 2 contains another freebsd
system.
Using freebsd boot loader, you need to press F1, F2 etc to select the
partition to boot from.
Say, I am on the system on partition one and I want to boot into
On Sat, 2002-12-28 at 18:51, Gerard Samuel wrote:
Well after almost 24 hours later, here is what happened...
Shortly after your last post, the situation got worse. I tried banging
the switch with a screwdriver, and that was it.
No more switch. The link light kept flashing, so I knew it was
At 06:55 PM 12.28.2002 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 11:09:12AM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote:
I've looked for a good set of working examples of packeting forwarding
using ipfw, but no luck yet. I'm wondering if the following rule would work
for sending packets received on
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Hey folks,
I'm noticing some odd behaviour with the linux compatability
recently. I have this small gnome app called gnome-run. It links against
a number of gnome libraries that I've copied from my linux partition over
to /compat/linux
How do you find if you are on the list? And who has the list?
Can they be sued?
Thanks,
Duncan (Dhu) Campbell
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 08:45:23 -0500
Harry Tabak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[This is a resend. Ironically, the orignal was blocked by FreeBSD's spam
filter, I've had to send this
Seems to me that this is an invitation to government
regulation -- interfering with the mail is a criminal
offense for good reason.
Dhu
On 28 Dec 2002 15:46:10 -0500
Shawn Duffy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The lists are usually kept on the websites of whatever particular
organizations are doing
Joe (and the list),
Your suggestion fixed my problem.
(I'm not sure if my first reply made it. Sorry if you received
duplicate responses.)
Cheers...
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 22:39, Tom Parquette wrote:
Please CC me on any replies. Thanks...
This is a 4.7-STABLE
Are you sure that the 66.45.0.0/17 block is from sb-blockdomains.rc file?
My guess is that it is from a listing on Five-Ten-SG blacklist, check out:
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/blackhole.php?ip=66.45.0.0
SpamBouncer supports a variety of blacklists including the Five-Ten-SG
blacklist, though
At 09:16 AM 12/28/2002, Harry Tabak wrote:
I can't really stop the Spambouncer people from shouting fire from their own
website -- freedom of speech and all that. But should FreeBSD act as an amplifier.
I personally believe that spam is a serious security issue (see
my paper at
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, [ISO-8859-1] Mikko Työläjärvi wrote:
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Hey folks,
I'm noticing some odd behaviour with the linux compatability
recently. I have this small gnome app called gnome-run. It links against
a number of gnome libraries
Seems to me that this is an invitation to government
regulation -- interfering with the mail is a criminal
offense for good reason.
Email is not regulated by the government.
Rick
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 02:00:12PM -0700, Brett Glass wrote:
I personally believe that spam is a serious security issue (see
my paper at http://www.brettglass.com/spam/). However, be warned
that this list's Supreme Moderator may declare your posting to
be off-topic, because it doesn't relate
Abe wrote:
Are you sure that the 66.45.0.0/17 block is from sb-blockdomains.rc file?
Nevermind. I found the Inflow entry in sb-blockdomains.rc file. :)
Regards,
Abe Ro
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Bosko Milekic wrote:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 02:00:12PM -0700, Brett Glass wrote:
I personally believe that spam is a serious security issue (see
my paper at http://www.brettglass.com/spam/). However, be warned
that this list's Supreme Moderator may declare your
(please tell me this is just a dream, and this thread really isn't
happening and I am not participating...)
++ 28/12/02 08:45 -0500 - Harry Tabak:
| I am not sure which list is best for this issue, hence the cross
| posting. I believe spam and anti-spam measures are security issues --
The
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, lewiz wrote:
I was playing around with some options on a 4.4-RELEASE disc1 ISO I'd
burnt. I have now got it working. I'm just about to test if it'll work
on 5.0-DP2. A guy on eu.openprojects.net in #freebsd told me to disable
all unrequired devices in visual config. I
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 14:11:50 -0800 (PST)
Rick Hamell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems to me that this is an invitation to government
regulation -- interfering with the mail is a criminal
offense for good reason.
Email is not regulated by the government.
Rick
Yup.
I _really_ fail to see what this has to do with FreeBSD.
Can you please move this to a more appropriate forum ? I'm sure
there are lists and groups out there where the black-listing
crew communicates.
Thankyou!
Poul-Henning
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Duncan Patton a Campb
ell writes:
So theoretically scanning email attatchments for viruses is illeagal too?
and the same goes for filtering out porn?
-chris
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
Seems to me that this is an invitation to government
regulation -- interfering with the mail is a criminal
offense
The law would have to consider intention of the sender:
Virii are (generally) not intended by the sender, except
for the original author. If I didn't intend to send the
virus, there is no constraint on you scanning and chopping
it. As for porn, if you are a minor, then by sending it
to you I
Harry Tabak wrote:
[This is a resend. Ironically, the orignal was blocked by FreeBSD's spam
filter, I've had to send this from another account]
I'm sorry to hear that you've had problems with spam filters; like most things
(and most people), they aren't perfect and they sometimes make
So we should let the govt open all unopened mail to make sure nothing is
illegal in it? and then leave it up to them to determine if it was
intentional?
please...
On Sat, 2002-12-28 at 16:51, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
The law would have to consider intention of the sender:
Virii are
No. The automated systems to filtre spam and virii better
be *really* careful about what they block.
If you block or subvert discrete communications between humans then
you are asking for real trouble. That's all.
Dhu
On 28 Dec 2002 17:00:54 -0500
Shawn Duffy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So
*doesnt want to get laws very involved with the internet*
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
No. The automated systems to filtre spam and virii better
be *really* careful about what they block.
If you block or subvert discrete communications between humans then
you are
On Saturday 28 December 2002 02:44 pm, Dale Morris wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up 4.7 after being away from FreeBSD for a
while. I'm having trouble with kmix
I have sound working, cd's play, realplayer works but when I
select kmixer from the panel, the waiting cursor comes up and
Here is the difference...
The US Postal Service is a government agency owned by the people,
hence, interfering with regular mail is bad..
email runs over corporate networks and uses private resources, none
owned by the people... hence a corporation, ISP, can certainly
decide what it allows into
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Chris Orr wrote:
*doesnt want to get laws very involved with the internet*
better yet, who's laws should be followed then? should the world follow
the american laws like loyal puppies or should we follow another countries
laws? perhaps the law of the country of the sending
I would say a better solution that blocks would be header/body based
phrase and word matching on a weighting system like spamassassin
provides. The False positive rates for such a system are MUCH lower
than what you could ever hope for with a blacklist. Also regarding
Inflow. They have been
CAN WE GET THIS THREAD KILLED NOW ???
It has nothing to do with FreeBSD.
Please shut up and move this thread somewhere else!
Poul-Henning
In message 1041114029.3577.60.camel@pitbull, Shawn Duffy writes:
--=-hYgamAC/8Ubo1V9A/Ysq
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 02:33:10PM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
lewiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've just got a 3C589 PCCARD NIC going. However, I'm using the BNC
(10Base2) connector so I need to specify ``media 10base2/BNC'' in
rc.conf. However, if I do this DHCP doesn't seem to
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 10:21:55PM +0100, Marcel Stangenberger wrote:
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, lewiz wrote:
I was playing around with some options on a 4.4-RELEASE disc1 ISO I'd
burnt. I have now got it working. I'm just about to test if it'll work
on 5.0-DP2. A guy on eu.openprojects.net
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 10:22:56PM +, lewiz wrote:
pccard_ifconfig but I could be wrong. It works so I'm leaving it there.
I ran the DOS-based 3Com configuation utility. I downloaded it from the
Internet (mail me if you can't find it and I'll email it to you). This
On second thoughts...
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 08:53:15AM -0500, Harry Tabak wrote:
Mail sent from my main server, gatehouse.quadtelecom.com (66.45.116.138)
gets rejected.
_450_Client_host_rejected:_cannot_find_your_hostname,_[66.45.116.138]
I'm getting this all the time too. It seems that after a while my mails
* Anish Mistry [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-12-28 14:11]:
On Saturday 28 December 2002 02:44 pm, Dale Morris wrote:
I'm in the process of setting up 4.7 after being away from FreeBSD for a
while. I'm having trouble with kmix
try running kmix from an xterm window and see what error message(s) you
Hi all. I used to have an email that came from this list detailing which
UPS program to use for freebsd, but for some reason I have lost it. I
currently have an APC 650 Pro UPS attached to Com1 on one of my machines
and I need to set it up so that it will monitor the machine and shut it
Hi all,
I just found a little problem with my security and i hope you guys (and
girls) can help me out.
I'm running an apache webserver (1.3.27) and the default ftpd (from the
inetd).
To use the mod_userdir i need to give all dirs and files in
/home/username/www 705 (rwx---r-x) and
On Saturday, 28 December 2002 at 11:27:53 -0600, Len Conrad wrote:
Easier said than done. I've been assigned 66.45.116.136/29 by the ISP.
.136 is not a power of 2 which is required for classless reverse
delegation.
They don't need to be powers of 2.
It should be .132/29 or .140/29
No,
On Saturday, 28 December 2002 at 22:32:30 +, lewiz wrote:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 08:53:15AM -0500, Harry Tabak wrote:
Mail sent from my main server, gatehouse.quadtelecom.com (66.45.116.138)
gets rejected.
_450_Client_host_rejected:_cannot_find_your_hostname,_[66.45.116.138]
I'm
When openssl in the basesystem and in ports will be updated? Quite a
long time has passed since the openssl 0.9.6h was released (5.12.02).
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
i prefer some way to insure that users cannot cd to other directory's
outside of there homedir.
i found the solution, i created a /etc/ftpchroot file and added the
usergroup.
Greetings,
Marcel
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, lewiz wrote:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 10:22:56PM +, lewiz wrote:
pccard_ifconfig but I could be wrong. It works so I'm leaving it there.
I ran the DOS-based 3Com configuation utility. I downloaded it from the
Internet (mail me if you can't find it and I'll email
On Saturday, December 28, 2002, at 04:22 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
No, this means that your DNS is flaky. As somebody observed, this is
a transient error. Your MTA retries about every 30 minutes for about
5 days, and sooner or later the reverse lookup succeeds, and your mail
is
Brett Glass wrote:
At 09:16 AM 12/28/2002, Harry Tabak wrote:
I can't really stop the Spambouncer people from shouting fire from their own website -- freedom of speech and all that. But should FreeBSD act as an amplifier.
I personally believe that spam is a serious security issue (see
my
Dear/Beste Patrick,
Saturday, December 28, 2002, 4:37:26 PM, you wrote:
Hello all,
What do you use for a backup solution for your freebsd server?
I've got a server running mail and web that I would like to back up
on a regular basis. Some of the ideas ive heard:
o Buy a
Chuck Swiger wrote:
snip
If one sends a message that could not be delivered, an error report
(called a DSN) is returned, describing the problem. People sending
legitimate email know who they've sent mail to, right? And when they
get DSN's, as you most probably did, you talk to your ISP,
Geez, Is this *still* going on?
Why are you still cc'ing the list
Regards,
Stacey
On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 03:11, Harry Tabak wrote:
Chuck Swiger wrote:
snip
If one sends a message that could not be delivered, an error report
(called a DSN) is returned, describing the problem. People
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 10:34:28PM -0500, Fuzzy wrote:
On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Saturday, 28 December 2002 at 22:32:30 +, lewiz wrote:
No, this means that your DNS is flaky. As somebody observed, this is
a transient error. Your MTA retries about every 30
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 02:49:34PM -0500, Murat Bicer wrote:
Lets say I have 2 freebsd instances installed on a box.
partition 1 contains one system, and partition 2 contains another freebsd
system.
Using freebsd boot loader, you need to press F1, F2 etc to select the
partition to boot
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 02:02:01AM +0100, Daimonion wrote:
When openssl in the basesystem and in ports will be updated? Quite a
long time has passed since the openssl 0.9.6h was released (5.12.02).
After 5.0-RELEASE; FreeBSD-current and the ports collection are in code freeze.
Kris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(12.28.2002 @ 2157 PST): Derision said, in 0.4K:
What is the correct line in the kernel config for
making halt -p work?
Mine is currently
deviceapm0
(FreeBSD 4.7)
end of APM from Derision
Make sure you also have:
Today I purchased a Belkin 5 port USB PCI card, which claims to be
OHCI compliant, and backwards-compatible to USB 1.1 -- so it should
work with FreeBSD, right?.
I'm not sure where I'm going wrong, but the system doesn't seem to
detect the card. I've tried scanpci, pcitweak, and pciconf to see
I'm not sure where I'm going wrong, but the system doesn't seem to
detect the card. I've tried scanpci, pcitweak, and pciconf to see if
the card shows up there (I'm not sure if those utilities actually scan
the PCI bus, or just report what's been scanned before, but...) and
still, it's not
Hello,
Anyone know of any similar commands that will strip out the DOS
control-M's that show up in files? dos2unix in solaris... rmcr in SCO..
how about FreeBSD?
Thanks..
C.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 10:54:53PM -0800, Chris P wrote:
Hello,
Anyone know of any similar commands that will strip out the DOS
control-M's that show up in files? dos2unix in solaris... rmcr in SCO..
how about FreeBSD?
The unix2dos port or a trivial 1-line tr command :)
Kris
I compiled device pcm in my kernel. my music cds play
perfect but mp3s wont play at all in xmms. i upgraded
from 4.6.2 to 4.7 last night and the mp3s played fine
in 4.6.2. Is there something I need to do in 4.7 that
I don't know about? I checked the handbook but
nothing. please Cc: [EMAIL
for entire files. I didnt see any ports for dos2unix.. Not real familiar
with tr..
C.
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 10:54:53PM -0800, Chris P wrote:
Hello,
Anyone know of any similar commands that will strip out the DOS
control-M's that show up
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 11:26:26PM -0800, Chris P wrote:
for entire files. I didnt see any ports for dos2unix.. Not real familiar
with tr..
I already you answered your question.
Kris
msg13546/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Probably you have your cd-rom drive plugged into your soundcard, which
means that its bypassing your operating system and sending the output
directly through the sound card. try running '#esd -trust -unix' and
see if your speakers are outputting sound. maybe its a problem with the
output plugin
Rick Hamell writes:
I'm not sure where I'm going wrong, but the system doesn't seem to
detect the card. I've tried scanpci, pcitweak, and pciconf to see if
the card shows up there (I'm not sure if those utilities actually scan
the PCI bus, or just report what's been scanned before,
the port for unix2dos goes both ways
--mat
On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 01:26, Chris P wrote:
for entire files. I didnt see any ports for dos2unix.. Not real familiar
with tr..
C.
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 10:54:53PM -0800, Chris P wrote:
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 22:54:53 -0800 (PST), Chris P wrote:
Hello,
Anyone know of any similar commands that will strip out the DOS
control-M's that show up in files? dos2unix in solaris... rmcr in SCO..
how about FreeBSD?
there is a dos2unix in the ports...
cd /usr/ports
make search
OK, Its all figured out now..
I didnt catch Kris's unix2dos.. I thought it was dos2unix. Then I found
the port unix2dos, which builds BOTH a dos2unix, and a unix2dos. I prefer
full explainations like that.. :)
Thanks to all that replied.
C.
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, paul beard wrote:
On
96 matches
Mail list logo
