sendmail: stat=Deferred: Connection reset by local

2009-05-26 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hi people. Please help! This morning I decided to go back to plain smtp without authentication that I had enabled about one year ago following the instructions in the handbook. Now sendmail doesn't deliver any more local mail. Here's part of a line from /var/log/maillog stat=Deferred:

Re: sendmail: stat=Deferred: Connection reset by local

2009-05-26 Thread Roberto Nunnari
, pri=30862, relay=local, dsn=4.4.2, stat=Deferred: Connection reset by local May 26 17:40:47 jupiter spamd[4853]: prefork: child states: II Please help! Thank you! Robi Roberto Nunnari ha scritto: Hi people. Please help! This morning I decided to go back to plain smtp without authentication

Re: sendmail: stat=Deferred: Connection reset by local

2009-05-26 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hi Wojciech. Thank you. See my answer in context. Wojciech Puchar ha scritto: for completeness, the last lines of maillog if I send a mail from root to a local account (robi): May 26 17:40:46 jupiter sendmail[10730]: n4QFeh7V010730: to=robi, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:03,

Re: sendmail: stat=Deferred: Connection reset by local

2009-05-26 Thread Roberto Nunnari
/usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail Roberto Nunnari wrote: for completeness, the last lines of maillog if I send a mail from root to a local account (robi): May 26 17:40:46 jupiter sendmail[10730]: n4QFeh7V010730: to=robi, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:03, xdelay=00:00:03, mailer=relay, pri=30032

Re: sendmail: stat=Deferred: Connection reset by local

2009-05-26 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Wojciech Puchar ha scritto: ps ax|grep sendmail # ps ax|grep sendmail 12313 ?? Ss 0:00.04 sendmail: accepting connections (sendmail) 12314 ?? S 0:02.34 sendmail: ./n4QG4DDt012314 mx1.eu.apache.org.: client DATA 354 (sendmail) 12315 ?? Is 0:00.00 sendmail: Queue

Re: sendmail: stat=Deferred: Connection reset by local

2009-05-26 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Wojciech Puchar ha scritto: now show me your /etc/mail/`hostname`*.mc here it is: it's `hostname`.mc looks OK but how about `hostname`.submit.mc here it is: divert(0)dnl VERSIONID(`$FreeBSD: src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.submit.mc,v 1.1 2003/10/19 00:03:13 gshapiro Exp $')

Re: sendmail: stat=Deferred: Connection reset by local

2009-05-26 Thread Roberto Nunnari
submit.mc file? Hi never had that line.. Any more hints? Tim Roberto Nunnari wrote: Wojciech Puchar ha scritto: ps ax|grep sendmail # ps ax|grep sendmail 12313 ?? Ss 0:00.04 sendmail: accepting connections (sendmail) 12314 ?? S 0:02.34 sendmail: ./n4QG4DDt012314 mx1

Re: sendmail: stat=Deferred: Connection reset by local

2009-05-26 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Wojciech Puchar ha scritto: here it is: divert(0)dnl VERSIONID(`$FreeBSD: src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.submit.mc,v 1.1 2003/10/19 00:03:13 gshapiro Exp $') define(`confCF_VERSION', `Submit')dnl define(`__OSTYPE__',`')dnl dirty hack to keep proto.m4 from complaining define(`_USE_DECNET_SYNTAX_',

Re: sendmail: stat=Deferred: Connection reset by local

2009-05-26 Thread Roberto Nunnari
the solution, I'll post it here. Best regards. Robi Roberto Nunnari ha scritto: Wojciech Puchar ha scritto: here it is: divert(0)dnl VERSIONID(`$FreeBSD: src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.submit.mc,v 1.1 2003/10/19 00:03:13 gshapiro Exp $') define(`confCF_VERSION', `Submit')dnl define(`__OSTYPE__',`')dnl dirty

upgrade from 6.1-RELEASE to 6.3-RELEASE

2008-09-23 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hello list. I'm about to upgrade from 6.1-RELEASE to 6.3-RELEASE from source and I'd like to ask a couple of questions. 1) Do the system interface change? That is, will I have to recompile all ports after upgrading? 2) Any gotcha, hints or things to be aware of? Of course, as usual I'll take

Re: upgrade from 6.1-RELEASE to 6.3-RELEASE

2008-09-23 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Good! Thank you guys for your quick answer. Best regards. Robi Matthew Seaman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Roberto Nunnari wrote: | Hello list. | | I'm about to upgrade from 6.1-RELEASE to 6.3-RELEASE | from source and I'd like to ask a couple of questions. | | 1

Re: X11 tunnel over ssh and then rsh

2008-08-22 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hello Nikos. Thank you for your reply. See my comments below. Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: On Thursday 21 August 2008 09:54:29 Roberto Nunnari wrote: Anybody on this, please? Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hello list. I have this scenario 1) host A with X server 2) host B with ssh server but without

Re: X11 tunnel over ssh and then rsh

2008-08-22 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hello Nikos. Thank you for your reply. See my comments below. Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: On Thursday 21 August 2008 09:54:29 Roberto Nunnari wrote: Anybody on this, please? Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hello list. I have this scenario 1) host A with X server 2) host B

Re: X11 tunnel over ssh and then rsh

2008-08-21 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Anybody on this, please? Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hello list. I have this scenario 1) host A with X server 2) host B with ssh server but without X server 3) host C with rsh server and X client programs but without X server (on host C there's also an ssh server, but in our case, users have

Re: X11 tunnel over ssh and then rsh

2008-08-21 Thread Roberto Nunnari
is all in a private network. Thanks for the suggestion. I'll try that right away. Robi Oliver Fromme wrote: Roberto Nunnari wrote: 1) host A with X server 2) host B with ssh server but without X server 3) host C with rsh server and X client programs but without X server (on host C there's

X11 tunnel over ssh and then rsh

2008-08-19 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hello list. I have this scenario 1) host A with X server 2) host B with ssh server but without X server 3) host C with rsh server and X client programs but without X server (on host C there's also an ssh server, but in our case, users have to use rsh) now, I need to connect from host A to host

Re: Install Linux in FreeBSD

2008-07-11 Thread Roberto Nunnari
I believe the OP question is: How to run a Full blown linux OS on a Virtual Machine on FreeBSD, and not how to run linux binaries on FreeBSD via emulation.. As for myself, I went the other way round, as I needed to run FreeBSD and windows on the same hardware. Best regards. Robi Jonathan

Re: perl WITH_THREADS= yes or no?

2008-06-19 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hi Anton. I'm no expert here, but I found that installing perl without threads works for the vast majority of ports. In one occasion I needed to recompile perl with thread because another port required so. Also, I remember that using WITH_THREADS=yes came together with a warning that it could

Re: how to check status of ida disks?

2008-06-11 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Anybody on this, please? -- Robi Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hello. I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 on an old compac server. The server has a RAID SCSI controller (if I'm not wrong is the Compaq SMART 3200 Controller) that at times I'd like to check if the status is still ok or somehow degraded. The OS

how to check status of ida disks?

2008-06-10 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hello. I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 on an old compac server. The server has a SCSI controller (if I'm not wrong is the Compaq SMART 3200 Controller) that at times I'd like to check if the status is still ok or somehow degraded. The OS is accessing it using the ida driver. Do anybody know how to

Re: how to check status of ida disks?

2008-06-10 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Sorry.. I meant *RAID* SCSI controller.. and the raid I'd like to check is RAID 1. -- Robi Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hello. I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 on an old compac server. The server has a SCSI controller (if I'm not wrong is the Compaq SMART 3200 Controller) that at times I'd like to check

Re: FreeBSD 7 on Windows 2008 (Hyper-V)

2008-06-09 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Same here. -- Robi Outback Dingo wrote: Ok heres the best solution, Im not even a big linux fan but install Ubuntu Server KVM, then install windows and FreeBSD 6, 7 or 8 Linux KVM just works, ive had 0 issues with FreeBSD under KVM with bridged networking. On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 6:59 PM,

Re: Server crashing, no explanations

2008-05-20 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Crash dumps should help. Alan Gilmour wrote: Hey all, We have recently been getting a lot of traffic to one of our sites. The CPU is consistently during busy periods using 100% utilisation. When this happens we have approx 150 apache threads, and the loads goes way above 15. However recently

Re: Server crashing, no explanations

2008-05-20 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Then, if crash dumps are enabled, it could be a HW failure.. Once I had a server crashing with no dumps, and I found out it was I power supply problem. Best regards. Robi Alan Gilmour wrote: Hi Roberto, There's nothing in /var/crash Any other ideas? Cheers Alan On 20/05/2008, Roberto

Re: raid1 + degraded (take out one disk) + fatal trap 12 on next reboot

2008-05-03 Thread Roberto Nunnari
the array and reinstall the OS. That is why you make a backup first when the system is off-duty. Ted -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Roberto Nunnari Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 12:35 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: raid1

Re: raid and dump/restore after the disaster

2008-04-30 Thread Roberto Nunnari
that the last activities before it panics are on the disks and fakeraid.. it finds one of the disks and then the last output before the panic is about the Intel MatrixRAID. Any thoughts on this, please? Best regards Robi Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hi all! I'm playing with new HW and FreeBSD 6.3

raid and dump/restore after the disaster

2008-04-29 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hi all! I'm playing with new HW and FreeBSD 6.3 and 7.0. I set up raid 1 on two sata disks (fakeraid on ICH9R) and as long as I can see, it seams to work very well. Now I'm trying to simulate 1 disk failure (I just take out a disk and boot again). Doesn't matter which of the two disks I take

Re: is this hardware supported?

2008-04-29 Thread Roberto Nunnari
: Installation gets to the end and lets a bootable system, but the system doesn't recognice the NIC nor the SATA fakeraid. Graphics is correctly configured and Gnome starts up correctly. Best regards. Roberto Nunnari wrote: Roland, Thank you for your support. I'll post here the result

Re: raid1 + degraded (take out one disk) + fatal trap 12 on next reboot

2008-04-29 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Nobody on this, please? :) Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hi all! I'm playing with new HW and FreeBSD 6.3 and 7.0. I set up raid 1 on two sata disks (fakeraid on ICH9R) and as long as I can see, it seams to work very well. Now I'm trying to simulate 1 disk failure (I just take out a disk and boot

FreeBSD on xen?

2008-04-24 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hi! Is anybody successfully running FreeBSD on xen? xen docs doesn't talk about support for FreeBSD.. Only Linux and Windows! The doc says the Guest operating system must be aware on running virtualized! Does FreeBSD supports it? What if the HW supports Intel's VT / AMD's AMD-V ? Will this

Re: is this hardware supported?

2008-04-22 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Roland, Thank you for your support. I'll post here the result of installing FreeBSD on that HW. Best regards. Robi. Roland Smith wrote: On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 06:45:40PM +0200, Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hi! Ok. So what about this? http://de.asus.com/products.aspx?modelmenu=2model=1178l1=3l2

Re: is this hardware supported?

2008-04-19 Thread Roberto Nunnari
CORE2DUO E4600 - 2 GB DDR2-RAM Patriot DDR2 2GB Kit, PC6400 - 2 sata drives (HW RAID 1) Any comment/hint welcome. Thank you. Best regards. -- Robi Roland Smith wrote: On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 02:12:28AM +0200, Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hi! I would like to buy the following motherboard but I

is this hardware supported?

2008-04-18 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hi! I would like to buy the following motherboard but I couldn't find its chipsets in the 6.3 supported HW list: So, I thought to ask the list for comments. http://www.gigabyte.de/Products/Motherboard/Products_Spec.aspx?ClassValue=MotherboardProductID=2613ProductName=GA-73PVM-S2H It's a

Re: Best way to achive email hosting for several domains

2008-03-20 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Please, any thoughts here? Best regards. Robi. Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hi. I'd like to know what are the best practices for implementing email hosting for several domains. The service is accessible via pop/imap/webmail Apart from that, I'd like to ask for comments on the actual comfiguration

Re: Best way to achive email hosting for several domains

2008-03-20 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hi Norberto. Norberto Meijome wrote: On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:29:29 +0100 Roberto Nunnari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now, everything works fine, but I'm a bit concerned with the webmail login.. I'd like [EMAIL PROTECTED] to login with a username equal to the email, but as the authentication

Best way to achive email hosting for several domains

2008-03-18 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hi. I'd like to know what are the best practices for implementing email hosting for several domains. The service is accessible via pop/imap/webmail Apart from that, I'd like to ask for comments on the actual comfiguration.. The system is already configured and running as follows: # uname -rms

Re: [SOLVED] sendmail: from virtual address changed to maindomain

2008-03-17 Thread Roberto Nunnari
hehe.. as usual.. the computer is always right! my fault.. seeing that 'make all' generates hostname.cf thought that was enough and never typed make install.. ahh... Best regards. Robi Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hello Matthew. Thank you for your reply. please see my comments below. Matthew

Re: sendmail: from virtual address changed to maindomain

2008-03-15 Thread Roberto Nunnari
yes. here it is. Thank you. Robi. Wojciech Puchar wrote: entries in hostname.mc FEATURE(virtusertable, `hash -o /etc/mail/virtusertable') FEATURE(genericstable, `hash -o /etc/mail/genericstable') GENERICS_DOMAIN_FILE(`/etc/mail/generics-domains') MX hostnames are all A records. well, as

Re: sendmail: from virtual address changed to maindomain

2008-03-15 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hello Matthew. Thank you for your reply. please see my comments below. Matthew Seaman wrote: Roberto Nunnari wrote: yes. here it is. Thank you. Robi. Wojciech Puchar wrote: entries in hostname.mc FEATURE(virtusertable, `hash -o /etc/mail/virtusertable') FEATURE(genericstable, `hash -o

sendmail: from virtual address changed to maindomain

2008-03-14 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hi all. This is driving me mad.. I hope a kind soul can help me out.. This is the relevant environment: # uname -rms FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p23 i386 # hostname jupiter.maindomain.com # cat /etc/mail/local-host-names maindomain.com mydomain1.com # cat /etc/mail/generics-domains mydomain1.com #

users cannot login anymore

2007-08-30 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hi. This morning I got a problem on one of my FreeBSD servers. In practice: # su - robi su: /bin/csh: Permission denied also, # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/tomcat6 start Starting tomcat60. su: /usr/local/bin/bash: Permission denied # uname -rms FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p19 i386 Any hints? -- Robi

Re: users cannot login anymore

2007-08-30 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hi Bahman. see below my answer. Bahman M. wrote: # su - robi su: /bin/csh: Permission denied also, # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/tomcat6 start Starting tomcat60. su: /usr/local/bin/bash: Permission denied # uname -rms FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p19 i386 What's the output of # ls -l /usr/local/bin/bash #

Re: users cannot login anymore

2007-08-30 Thread Roberto Nunnari
in effect, trying to login as a unprivileged user gives an additional line.. but it doesn't give me hints.. # ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Password: Last login: Thu Aug 30 12:12:12 2007 from Copyright (c) 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1990, 1991, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of

Re: users cannot login anymore

2007-08-30 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Puchar wrote: check / and /lib and /libexec On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hi Bahman. see below my answer. Bahman M. wrote: # su - robi su: /bin/csh: Permission denied also, # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/tomcat6 start Starting tomcat60. su: /usr/local/bin/bash: Permission denied # uname

Re: em0 net interface Link state changed to UP too late at boot time

2007-06-29 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hi Kevin. Ok. I'll try that. Thank you. -- Robi Kevin Downey wrote: On 6/28/07, Roberto Nunnari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Kevin. No DHCP. The box gets a static address. From rc.conf: ifconfig_em0=inet aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd netmask 255.255.252.0 media 1000baseTX as you see, I also tried

net interface Link state changed to UP too late at boot time

2007-06-28 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hello list. I have a couple of FreeBSD boxes here that when booting the network interface Link state is changed to UP too late. .. as the systems mount at boot time a NFS FS, it hangs there and after that I get the following kernel message: xl0: Link state changed to UP or (depending on the

Re: em0 net interface Link state changed to UP too late at boot time

2007-06-28 Thread Roberto Nunnari
before in the boot stage? Thank you again. Best regards. -- Robi Lowell Gilbert wrote: Roberto Nunnari [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ..but on the other box (the em0 one that at the second retry will succed to mount the NFS FS) is there since I upgraded it from 5.3-RELEASE to 6.1-RELEASE Again.. any

net interface Link state changed to UP too late at boot time

2007-06-28 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hello list. Sorry to post again.. I just realized I was not subscribed (now I am) and also forgot to tell the OS version: # uname -rms FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p15 i386 I have a couple of FreeBSD boxes here that when booting, the network interface Link state is changed to UP too late. .. as the

Re: net interface Link state changed to UP too late at boot time

2007-06-28 Thread Roberto Nunnari
On one of the boxes the problem is solved.. it was a mistake of mine.. ..but on the other box (the em0 one that at the second retry will succed to mount the NFS FS) is there since I upgraded it from 5.3-RELEASE to 6.1-RELEASE Again.. any hints? Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hello list. Sorry

top: what processes use the CPU?

2006-08-10 Thread Roberto Nunnari
% 0.00% top 74398 root 80 3892K 3740K wait 0:00 0.00% 0.00% make # uname -srp FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p31 i386 Please reply also to my mailbox, as I'm not on the list. Thank you! -- Roberto Nunnari -software engineer- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: top: what processes use the CPU?

2006-08-10 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Stefan Bethke wrote: Am 10.08.2006 um 08:38 schrieb Roberto Nunnari: Hello everybody. Just a short question: Why top doesn't any more show what processes use the CPU? I mean.. 0.0% idle and the sum of the processes CPU doesn't reach 1.0%.. as an example, while make buildkernel top shows

Re: top: what processes use the CPU?

2006-08-10 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Stefan Bethke wrote: Am 10.08.2006 um 11:09 schrieb Roberto Nunnari: Stefan Bethke wrote: Am 10.08.2006 um 08:38 schrieb Roberto Nunnari: Hello everybody. Just a short question: Why top doesn't any more show what processes use the CPU? I mean.. 0.0% idle and the sum of the processes CPU

Re: top: what processes use the CPU?

2006-08-10 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Chuck Swiger wrote: Roberto Nunnari wrote: Stefan Bethke wrote: [ ... ] Because the cc processes are too short lived to consistently show up when top is scanning the process table? Ok.. but as idle CPU shows 0.0%, there should be a way of getting the processes that finished already living

Re: max number of groups a user can be member of

2006-07-25 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hi. Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Jul 24), Roberto Nunnari said: Hi everybody. Could anybody tell me the reason why by default FreeBSD limits the number of groups a user can be member of to 16? Compatibility with the NFS protocol. A google search on nfs 16 groups returned a lot

Re: max number of groups a user can be member of

2006-07-25 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Sorry.. In my previous mail, I forgot to say to send replies to my mailbox as well, as I'm not on the list. Thank you. Hi. Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Jul 24), Roberto Nunnari said: Hi everybody. Could anybody tell me the reason why by default FreeBSD limits the number of groups

max number of groups a user can be member of

2006-07-24 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hi everybody. Could anybody tell me the reason why by default FreeBSD limits the number of groups a user can be member of to 16? Not all servers have 5000k users and today memory is not an issue. Indeed, some servers used just for services have no users apart a few staff users and users to run

Re: max number of groups a user can be member of

2006-07-24 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Thank you Dan. I'll set up a test machine and try a kernel with the limit set to 256. Do you know if that change requires a build world or a buildkernel is enough? Best regards. Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Jul 24), Roberto Nunnari said: Hi everybody. Could anybody tell me

patches and uname -a

2006-01-12 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hello. Please also answer to my mailbox as I'm not on the list. After upgrading by sources and build world, uname correctly reports the current version of the system Today for the first time I applied all the relevant patches instead and all went well. The box was 5.3-RELEASE-p23. The applied

Re: patches and uname -a

2006-01-12 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Thank you Ceri and Jaap for your time. Ceri, edit src/sys/conf/newvers.sh and replace BRANCH=RELEASE-p23 with BRANCH=RELEASE-p24 would be enough?? Best regards. Ceri Davies wrote: On 12 Jan 2006, at 12:32, Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hello. Please also answer to my mailbox as I'm

Re: {Spam?} Re: patches and uname -a

2006-01-12 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Ceri Davies wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:26:22PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote: Ceri Davies wrote: On 12 Jan 2006, at 12:32, Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hello. Please also answer to my mailbox as I'm not on the list. After upgrading by sources and build world, uname correctly reports

Re: {Spam?} Re: patches and uname -a

2006-01-12 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Ceri Davies wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:26:22PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote: Ceri Davies wrote: On 12 Jan 2006, at 12:32, Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hello. Please also answer to my mailbox as I'm not on the list. After upgrading by sources and build world, uname correctly reports

Re: {Spam?} Re: {Spam?} Re: patches and uname -a

2006-01-12 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Ceri Davies wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:04:07PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote: I checked the patches (cpio.patch ee.patch texindex5x.patch) and none of them tries to change src/sys/conf/newvers.sh nor src/UPDATING There is an ipfw one as well. Cheers, Ceri Thank you Ceri, but I

Re: grub doesn't know ufs filesystem

2005-12-15 Thread Roberto Nunnari
at 08:36 -0800, Micah wrote: Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hello list. Please also reply to my mailbox, as I'm not on the list. Thank you. I have a old grub floppy that I use time to time to boot/recover pc with different OS.. Today I wanted to boot a freebsd 5.3-RELEASE-p23 box, but to my surprise

Re: grub doesn't know ufs filesystem

2005-12-15 Thread Roberto Nunnari
the disklabel is essentialy the same.. apart from the size of the swap and consequently the offset of the rest of the internal partitions.. Again.. any ideas? -- Robi Harley D. Eades III wrote: On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 08:36 -0800, Micah wrote: Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hello list. Please also reply to my

grub doesn't know ufs filesystem

2005-12-14 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hello list. Please also reply to my mailbox, as I'm not on the list. Thank you. I have a old grub floppy that I use time to time to boot/recover pc with different OS.. Today I wanted to boot a freebsd 5.3-RELEASE-p23 box, but to my surprise grub reported: Filesystem type unknown, partition

ata0-master: FAILURE - ATA_IDENTIFY time out

2005-11-15 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hi. Could any kind soul help me out, please? Please, also reply to my mailbox as I'm not on the list. I just upgrade a i386 FreeBSD box from REL-5.3.p15 to REL-5.3.p23. after installkernel I could reboot to single usermode and did installworld, but after that I can no longer reboot..

ata0-master: FAILURE - ATA_IDENTIFY time out

2005-11-15 Thread Roberto Nunnari
ok ok.. fixed it! Don't know why, but boot_modules was set to /boot/modules .. set that to /boot/kernel and the system was up again. Sorry for the noise! Best regards. -- Robi ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: access oracle from php (mod_php4)

2005-03-01 Thread Roberto Nunnari
. On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 09:31:14PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote: I'm using a client app to access an oracle 8i database myself. I'm using unixODBC on freebsd which the oracle 9i libraries from the oracle website and the oracle driver from www.easysoft.com which allows unixodbc apps to use

Re: talk command help

2005-02-17 Thread Roberto Nunnari
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Roberto Nunnari -software engineer- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Scuola Universitaria Professionale della Svizzera Italiana Dipartimento Tecnologie Innovative http://www.dti.supsi.ch SUPSI-DTI Via Cantonale

Re: upgrading to a specified version?

2005-02-17 Thread Roberto Nunnari
You Yahoo!? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Roberto Nunnari -software engineer- mailto

no crash dump generated

2005-02-16 Thread Roberto Nunnari
~ Wed Feb 16 09:16 What do I miss? Do I need some kernel option? Best regards. -- Roberto Nunnari -software engineer- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Scuola Universitaria Professionale della Svizzera Italiana Dipartimento Tecnologie Innovative

access oracle from php (mod_php4)

2005-02-03 Thread Roberto Nunnari
PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WEB i386 Could any kind soul help me? Thank you! -- Roberto Nunnari -software engineer- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Scuola Universitaria Professionale della Svizzera Italiana Dipartimento Tecnologie Innovative

ipfw not working any more after upgrade to 5.3

2005-01-29 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Hello. I just upgraded my FreeBSD box to 5.3-RELEASE-p5 from 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 and now I can no longer use ipfw to fwd from one port to another: # ipfw add fwd 192.168.1.5,8180 tcp from any to 192.168.1.5 80 ipfw: getsockopt(IP_FW_ADD): Invalid argument What's wrong? Please send replies also to my

Re: /etc/make.conf

2004-08-12 Thread Roberto Nunnari
As announced yesterday.. ..today I finished the upgrade process and all went just fine. ...have you had the chance to find out whether perl is needed at all in 5.2.1? Best regards. Lowell Gilbert wrote: Henrik W Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Roberto Nunnari wrote: Thank you all for your answers

/etc/make.conf

2004-08-11 Thread Roberto Nunnari
A perl5 module implementing High resolution time, sleep, an perl-5.6.1_15 Practical Extraction and Report Language perl-5.8.2_5Practical Extraction and Report Language Thank you. -- Roberto Nunnari -software engineer- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Scuola

Re: /etc/make.conf

2004-08-11 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Thank you all for your answers. one more questions... What is the preferred/advised version for buildWorld and co? Henrik W Lund wrote: Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hi all. Please also reply to my mailbox, as I'm not on the list. Thank you! Can anybody tell me about /etc/make.conf in FreeBSD-5.2.1

Re: /etc/make.conf

2004-08-11 Thread Roberto Nunnari
regards. Lowell Gilbert wrote: Henrik W Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Roberto Nunnari wrote: Thank you all for your answers. one more questions... What is the preferred/advised version for buildWorld and co? Without knowing for sure, I'd say the base version of perl is the best one to use for the whole

strange kernel messages..

2004-08-04 Thread Roberto Nunnari
-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 #2: Fri Jul 30 17:35:55 CEST 2004 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WEB i386 Thank you. -- Roberto Nunnari -software engineer- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Scuola Universitaria Professionale della Svizzera Italiana Dipartimento

Re: strange kernel messages..

2004-08-04 Thread Roberto Nunnari
Thank you Simon. Simon Barner wrote: Roberto Nunnari wrote: Hello. Please send replies also to my mailbox, as I'm not on this list. Can anybody tell me what are these messages about? Are them just informational or do I have to worry? Aug 2 18:23:59 web kernel: lock order reversal Aug 2 18:23:59

# bsdlabel -w /dev/amrd1 auto

2004-03-30 Thread Roberto Nunnari
as before? Thank you. -- Roberto Nunnari -software engineer- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Scuola Universitaria Professionale della Svizzera Italiana Dipartimento Tecnologie Innovative http://www.dti.supsi.ch SUPSI-DTI Via Cantonale

broken partition table

2004-03-29 Thread Roberto Nunnari
fdisk.conf.amrd0 # values extacted from old fdisk.amrd0 g c4420 h255s63 p 1 165 63 71007237 p 2 0 0 0 p 3 0 0 0 p 4 0 0 0 a 1 -- Roberto Nunnari -software engineer

Re: cannot resolve localhost

2003-05-29 Thread Roberto Nunnari
but the problem is still there... any ideas? Ruben de Groot wrote: On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 12:37:30PM +0200, Roberto Nunnari typed: Hi there. Hi, 5.0-RELEASE != current, you would better have asked this on -questions. To answer your question: man nsswitch.conf cheers, Ruben it seems that my 5.0