Anybody is using the Tor Browser?
I started using security/tor.
In addition to this, the tor
folk insist on using the tor browser:
https://www.torproject.org/download/download#warning
which is a part of the tor bundle:
https://www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser-details.html.en#build
Now
I find two native FreeBSD ports for OPERA.
With that I want to say, I am not using Linux-Opera anymore.
But since some time, I had installed
www/opera-devel
and
www/opera
at the same time and played with them. Now I see, that opera has a
greater release-level then opera-devel.
That makes no
://http://www.opera.com/browser/next/
pull down the correct file, then untar it into a directory,
copy the profile/ directory over (if needed) run it
from the local users directory.
This way we don't have stray files clotting up /usr/local
don't have to rely on the whims of the maintainer
to update
My mouse works as expected for copy and paste function on the xterm
console. But when I launch the links command line browser the mouse
pointer is OVER active. I move the mouse a hair and the pointer on the
links browser screen moves 2 inches. Is there some way in links to
control the mouse
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 09:33:43AM -0400, Fbsd8 wrote:
My mouse works as expected for copy and paste function on the xterm
console. But when I launch the links command line browser the
mouse pointer is OVER active. I move the mouse a hair and the
pointer on the links browser screen moves 2
Hello.
2012/04/05 09:33:43 -0400 Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com = To FreeBSD Questions
:
F My mouse works as expected for copy and paste function on the xterm
F console. But when I launch the links command line browser the mouse
F pointer is OVER active. I move the mouse a hair and the pointer
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 08:48:35PM +, Peter Harrison wrote:
First impressions of xxxterm are that it's very good. The keybinding is
quite as good as uzbl or vimperator on firefox, but it's live-able
with, and it seems to have fewer performance or configuration
downsides.
I've been using
that is good-enough. but it's
author says that this firefox 'addon' will not work with
firefox-9. So: does anybody know of a browser with a
builtin text-to-speech reader? i have searched ff and found
no other such readers.
I was hoping someone else might have an answer
On 4 January 2012 17:18, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 12:56:38 -0500
ill...@gmail.com wrote:
If you have a few hours, lots of RAM, you'd like to stress-
test your system:
cd /usr/ports/www/chromium make install
Unless things have changed radically that sounds
to X during the make stage. That was the
point I decided _not_ to continue (as the system
in question didn't have X). Maybe I did something
wrong, maybe I should have dealt with building
options more carefully. But anyway, you type make
and the intended web browser wants to access X?
From within a UID
something
wrong, maybe I should have dealt with building
options more carefully.
You turned-on Profile-Guided Optimization, which is off by default.
But anyway, you type make
and the intended web browser wants to access X?
From within a UID=0 session? Hmmm...
pre-extract:
.if defined(WITH_PGO
Im running Free BSD 8.2 and was wondering whats a good web browser for
version 8.2?
Where and how would we install it? ( Im really new to unix)
Thanks,
Daniel Lewis
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Hi,
Reference:
From: Daniel Lewis innervisionnetw...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 07:17:47 -0500
Message-id:
cahsizg-op0mo79qawg2grlyleatkcip8iabq+0ayqvk7idz...@mail.gmail.com
Daniel Lewis wrote:
Im running Free BSD 8.2 and was wondering whats a good web browser
On 01/04/2012 01:17 PM, Daniel Lewis wrote:
Im running Free BSD 8.2 and was wondering whats a good web browser for
version 8.2?
Where and how would we install it? ( Im really new to unix)
Thanks,
Daniel Lewis
Hi Daniel,
It depends on your preferences.
You can read up on:
http
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 07:17:47 -0500, Daniel Lewis wrote:
Im running Free BSD 8.2 and was wondering whats a good web browser for
version 8.2?
Where and how would we install it? ( Im really new to unix)
You will get many different answers for this question. :-)
What are your primary requirements
running Free BSD 8.2 and was wondering whats a good web browser for
version 8.2?
Where and how would we install it? ( Im really new to unix)
su
cd /usr/ports/www/firefox ; make install
This fetches then builds from source code
Or to install binaries
man pkg_add
Cheers,
Julian
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 07:17:47AM -0500, Daniel Lewis wrote:
Im running Free BSD 8.2 and was wondering whats a good web browser for
version 8.2?
Where and how would we install it? ( Im really new to unix)
There are at least as many answers to this as there are browsers, and
probably quite
running Free BSD 8.2 and was wondering whats a good web browser for
version 8.2?
Where and how would we install it? ( Im really new to unix)
su
cd /usr/ports/www/firefox ; make install
This fetches then builds from source code
Or to install binaries
man pkg_add
If you have a few
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 07:17:47AM -0500, Daniel Lewis wrote:
Im running Free BSD 8.2 and was wondering whats a good web browser for
version 8.2?
Where and how would we install it? ( Im really new to unix)
There are at least as many answers
On 4 Jan 2012, at 16:54, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 07:17:47AM -0500, Daniel Lewis wrote:
Im running Free BSD 8.2 and was wondering whats a good web browser for
version 8.2?
Where and how would we install it? ( Im really new to unix)
There are at least as many answers
I looked, though
I may have relied on a nonstandard ports tree search tool that sometimes
(unexpectedly) fails to update its search database. It's good to hear
xxxterm is available in ports.
I installed for exactly the same reasons you're looking at it - fast
lean browser with good (vi-like
looking at it - fast
lean browser with good (vi-like) keybindings.
I'm playing with it now. I find I need to rebind a lot of functionality
to make it feel really vi-like, and some of the bindings I would like to
use are not possible with the keybinding configuration capabilities of
xxxterm
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 12:56:38 -0500
ill...@gmail.com wrote:
If you have a few hours, lots of RAM, you'd like to stress-
test your system:
cd /usr/ports/www/chromium make install
Unless things have changed radically that sounds like a bit of an
exaggeration. Until about 9 months ago I was
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 08:48:35PM +, Peter Harrison wrote:
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 20:48:35 +
From: Peter Harrison four.harris...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: Browser
To: Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com
Cc: questi...@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 09:54:46PM +, Peter Harrison wrote:
On 4 Jan 2012, at 21:26, Chad Perrin wrote:
Did you mean to say The keybinding is *not* quite as good . . . or did
you mean it is, as you wrote it here?
Perils of typing too fast.
Yes, I meant the keybinding is /not/
gnome-open is the program that opens your browser when you click
on a link in gnome-terminal. Except that recently it's started
opening Gedit, the gnome text editor, instead.
I have triple super checked to be absolutely sure that the preferred
web browser application is my browser (chrome
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:03 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws wrote:
... when mplayer plays some (rare) video files.
Xorg then stays at 100% CPU, and it is impossible to kill it,
neither from the inside, nor from the outside (logged in via
ssh) with SIGKILL.
Yuri y...@rawbw.com writes:
I saw this with firefox, now I see the same with chrome.
After a while when the browser is launched with ~10 tabs open, Xorg
begins to consume 100% CPU and all graphics apps get
sluggish. Quitting the browser brings situation back to normal.
[...]
Have you tried
I saw this with firefox, now I see the same with chrome.
After a while when the browser is launched with ~10 tabs open, Xorg
begins to consume 100% CPU and all graphics apps get sluggish. Quitting
the browser brings situation back to normal.
It looks amazing to me that both firefox
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote:
I saw this with firefox, now I see the same with chrome.
After a while when the browser is launched with ~10 tabs open, Xorg begins
to consume 100% CPU and all graphics apps get sluggish. Quitting the browser
brings situation back
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, C. P. Ghost wrote:
Running:
FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0 r222832 amd64
with
xorg-server-1.7.7_1,1
xorg-drivers-7.5.1
and the radeonhd driver:
radeonhd is defunct. Everything it does should be done better by the
radeon driver from xf86-video-ati.
C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws wrote:
... when mplayer plays some (rare) video files.
Xorg then stays at 100% CPU, and it is impossible to kill it,
neither from the inside, nor from the outside (logged in via
ssh) with SIGKILL. Only a reboot helps here.
An unkillable process is almost
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:28:45AM -0800, Chip Camden wrote:
It's called Vimium, and Chad Perrin figured out how to get it working on
FreeBSD. But Vimium isn't Vimperator, and chromium disables extensions
when viewing the home page or local files. So, for instance, vimium's
key bindings
I've heard certain noises on this list that the current
port-maintainer of Chromium has dropped the ball (not my words, just
paraphrasing the sentiment from the below thread).
That's too bad. I'm using Chromium 6.0.472.63 from the ports which
works quite nicely, although I'm aware of the
have its own twitter and facebook
tho.
Anybody else have the browser on FBSD??
Tried it before then deleted it... it depends on ALSA and builds its own
webkit package instead of the one in the ports
-g
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service
its own twitter and facebook
tho.
Anybody else have the browser on FBSD??
I haven't tried it, but maybe it works under the FreeBSD Linux emulation. I
found some build hints here too: http://wiki.freebsd.org/Chromium , however it
definitely needs some love from a dedicated FreeBSD
I give it all three thumbs
down.
Would still like to see GOOG have its own twitter and facebook
tho.
Anybody else have the browser on FBSD??
I haven't tried it, but maybe it works under the FreeBSD Linux emulation. I
found some build hints here too: http
thumbs
down.
Would still like to see GOOG have its own twitter and facebook
tho.
Anybody else have the browser on FBSD??
I haven't tried it, but maybe it works under the FreeBSD Linux emulation. I
found some build hints here too: http://wiki.freebsd.org/Chromium , however
... like vlc, etc. Can't find and back/Forward
icons, nothing like firefoxI give it all three thumbs
down.
Would still like to see GOOG have its own twitter and facebook
tho.
Anybody else have the browser on FBSD??
I haven't tried it, but maybe it works under
GOOG have its own twitter and facebook
tho.
Anybody else have the browser on FBSD??
-g
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org
The 7.98a release of Jottings: http
Hey,
Am 16.02.2011 10:54, schrieb Sergiy Suprun:
Hi.
I use free package from http://chromium.hybridsource.org/ on my home pc.
All works fine.
Linux emulation used only for adobe flash but is other story
For this package u must pay, so i have understand. I has read that come
a new port
On Wed Feb 16 11, Silvio Siefke wrote:
Hey,
Am 16.02.2011 10:54, schrieb Sergiy Suprun:
Hi.
I use free package from http://chromium.hybridsource.org/ on my home pc.
All works fine.
Linux emulation used only for adobe flash but is other story
For this package u must pay, so i
GOOG have its own twitter and facebook
tho.
Anybody else have the browser on FBSD??
-g
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org
The 7.98a release of Jottings: http
, nothing like firefoxI give it all three thumbs
down.
Would still like to see GOOG have its own twitter and facebook
tho.
Anybody else have the browser on FBSD??
I haven't tried it, but maybe it works under the FreeBSD Linux emulation. I
found some build hints
'o' and 'j'
and 'H' when browsing using IE on my works machine.
Peter Harrison
www.4harrisons.blogspot.com
-
From: Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com
Subject:Re: google browser?
Date: 16th February 2011 16:06
Quoth Devin Teske on Wednesday
Quoth four.harris...@googlemail.com on Wednesday, 16 February 2011:
Sorry for top-posting - my 'phone makes doing it properly difficult.
There is a similar extension to Vimperator for Chromium, but it's name
escapes me (Vimeo?). Last time I checked though it didn't work on the FreeBSD
maintainer's
business model kept the port at v6.x, which is what is currently in
ports. The current version of the chromium browser is 9.x, and I suspect
the minor work done early this year is work on getting v9.x ready for
inclusion in ports.
Now... that being said, I have a co-worker
the browser on FBSD??
-g
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org
The 7.98a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org
___
freebsd
Hi
One of our freebsd systems is a user terminal with desktop. We have constant
difficulties with web browsing on that platform. Here is the data
1. INFO:
System:
freebsd 7.2-RELEASE-p3 - GENERIC amd64
Desktop:
kde4.5.1
Current installed web browser stuff:
konqueror 4.5.1
epiphany-2.30.2_1
reliable browser combination and recomendations of specific
port combinations which can deliver reliable browsing including
flash capability.
What works for me - doesn't crash, but sometimes can't handle
the content - is:
firefox-3.6.8 (or)
seamonkey-2.0.6
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 07:46:53 -0400, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
David Southwell writes:
[snip]
3. ADVICE PLEASE
Most reliable browser combination and recomendations of specific
port combinations which can deliver reliable browsing including
flash capability.
What
Current installed web browser stuff:
konqueror 4.5.1
epiphany-2.30.2_1
firefox-3.5.11,1
flashplugin-mozilla-0.4.13_5 A GPL standalone Flash (TM) plugin for Mozilla
This plugin is now five years old, and doesn't seem to be in active
development anymore.
3. ADVICE PLEASE
Most reliable
installed web browser stuff:
konqueror 4.5.1
epiphany-2.30.2_1
firefox-3.5.11,1
flashplugin-mozilla-0.4.13_5 A GPL standalone Flash (TM) plugin for
Mozilla
This plugin is now five years old, and doesn't seem to be in active
development anymore.
3. ADVICE PLEASE
Most reliable browser
of all available browsers - seems to be flash
related.
3. ADVICE PLEASE
Most reliable browser combination and recomendations of specific
port combinations which can deliver reliable browsing including
flash capability.
What works for me - doesn't crash, but sometimes can't
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Tue Aug 24 16:31:11 2010
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:31:29 -0700
From: Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com
To: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: printing outside browser cuts off top and bottom of page
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 02:42:18PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Chad Perrin wrote:
I was not entirely sure before today whether the 4050N could handle
straight PostScript instead of PCL, but the test I performed using nc to
see if it would print properly involved using
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 01:31:06AM -0500, Robert Bonomi wrote:
What are the chances that that those 'problem' PDFs are designed for a
slightly _different_ paper size, and CUPS is -nto- 'scaling' to fit the
actual paper size?
When printing via a method that bypasses CUPS (using netcat), it
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 06:12:40PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Chad Perrin wrote:
CUPS is a black box to me, filled with black magic.
Me too. That's why I use lpd.
I'm considering it, at least for this laptop. Still, it would be nice to
know how to fix this problem
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:33:34PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
Quoth Warren Block on Tuesday, 24 August 2010:
It appears that PPDs are stored in the reasonably-named
/usr/local/etc/cups/ppd. There's a PPD for the LJ4050 in
print/foomatic-db...
And it has
*ImageableArea
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:12:40 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com
wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:49:24PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
The LJ4050 is a great printer, but it doesn't print PDFs natively.
So you need to find what CUPS is
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:33:34PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
Quoth Warren Block on Tuesday, 24 August 2010:
It appears that PPDs are stored in the reasonably-named
/usr/local/etc/cups/ppd. There's a PPD for the LJ4050 in
print/foomatic-db...
And it
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 07:57:29AM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
For another test, use pdf2ps and feed the PS output directly to the
printer, bypassing CUPS. If the LJ4050N Ethernet is connected (and it
really should be), you can use nc something like this (untested):
# pdf2ps test.pdf -
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:38:52AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
If your printer can do PS, you don't need CUPS; lpd does everything.
If you just need to convert printing output (which traditionally *is*
PS) to PCL, you might be interested in using apsfilter. It's a lot
more lightweight than
Quoth Chad Perrin on Wednesday, 25 August 2010:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 07:57:29AM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
For another test, use pdf2ps and feed the PS output directly to the
printer, bypassing CUPS. If the LJ4050N Ethernet is connected (and it
really should be), you can use nc
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:27:20 -0600, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
Is there much I'd need to know about apsfilter to use it with lpd?
No, just make sure to compile it with options
PAGE=A4
PAPERSIZE=a4
A4=yes
in /etc/make.conf if you need ISO A4 support. It is
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Chip Camden wrote:
Quoth Chad Perrin on Wednesday, 25 August 2010:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 07:57:29AM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
For another test, use pdf2ps and feed the PS output directly to the
printer, bypassing CUPS. If the LJ4050N Ethernet is connected (and it
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Chad Perrin wrote:
I was not entirely sure before today whether the 4050N could handle
straight PostScript instead of PCL, but the test I performed using nc to
see if it would print properly involved using pdf2ps and no other file
format transformations, so it seems PS is
I'm using CUPS on FreeBSD 8.0, and any time I try to print from outside
Firefox the top and bottom of a PDF gets cut off. I don't have any means
installed for printing a PDF from inside Firefox, but Webpages and the
CUPS test page print just fine from within the browser. For instance:
/usr
from within the browser. For instance:
/usr/local/bin/lpr -P 4050N sheet.pdf
(using an HP 4050N printer)
This results in the top and bottom edge of the PDF getting cut off. I've
tried tweaking settings in GUI tools such as GtkLP to try to force it to
print the PDF at a smaller size
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 02:04:32PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
I'm not seeing that here, but I don't have a PDF that prints data in the
margins. If you have one, can you email it to me?
I don't think it prints to the margins, per se.
I also know that it's not particular to the printer, since
Quoth Chad Perrin on Tuesday, 24 August 2010:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 02:04:32PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
I'm not seeing that here, but I don't have a PDF that prints data in the
margins. If you have one, can you email it to me?
I don't think it prints to the margins, per se.
I
within the browser. For instance:
/usr/local/bin/lpr -P 4050N sheet.pdf
(using an HP 4050N printer)
This results in the top and bottom edge of the PDF getting cut off. I've
tried tweaking settings in GUI tools such as GtkLP to try to force it to
print the PDF at a smaller size on the page so
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:49:24PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
The LJ4050 is a great printer, but it doesn't print PDFs natively.
So you need to find what CUPS is using to convert PDFs to PostScript and
adjust that. It may be an A4 to letter conversion, or it's trying to
intelligently
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:49:24PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
The LJ4050 is a great printer, but it doesn't print PDFs natively.
So you need to find what CUPS is using to convert PDFs to PostScript and
adjust that. It may be an A4 to letter
Quoth Warren Block on Tuesday, 24 August 2010:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:49:24PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
The LJ4050 is a great printer, but it doesn't print PDFs natively.
So you need to find what CUPS is using to convert PDFs to PostScript and
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Chip Camden wrote:
Quoth Warren Block on Tuesday, 24 August 2010:
As Chip Camden noted, it could be a problem with the printable area not
being correct. CUPS should get that information from a PPD file--I
think. Do you have the correct PPD installed...er...wherever it
Quoth Warren Block on Tuesday, 24 August 2010:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Chip Camden wrote:
Quoth Warren Block on Tuesday, 24 August 2010:
As Chip Camden noted, it could be a problem with the printable area not
being correct. CUPS should get that information from a PPD file--I
think. Do you have
. But it segfaults on
start:
- gst-browser
Recompiling classes...
Recompiling class: GTK.GtkRequisition class
Recompiling selector: #sizeof
Recompiling classes...
Recompiling classes...
Recompiling classes...
Recompiling class: GTK.GdkEventButton class
Recompiling selector: #sizeof
Recompiling
system you use (FreeBSD version and architecture).
Best regards,
Johan van Selst
It compiles and installs on FreeBSD 8.0-p2 on amd64. But it segfaults on
start:
- gst-browser
Recompiling classes...
Recompiling class: GTK.GtkRequisition class
Recompiling selector: #sizeof
Recompiling
Anyone have experience using Sun's Virtual Box on FreeBSD? I am
looking for a way to run virtual Windows machines to do cross-browser
testing...
Don't need sound card or anything complex... if I can get it working
good enough to have access to IE 6, 7, and 8 (with 3 different virtual
boxes
John Almberg jalmb...@identry.com a écrit :
Anyone have experience using Sun's Virtual Box on FreeBSD? I am
looking for a way to run virtual Windows machines to do
cross-browser testing...
Don't need sound card or anything complex... if I can get it working
good enough to have access
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:02 AM, John Almberg jalmb...@identry.com wrote:
Anyone have experience using Sun's Virtual Box on FreeBSD? I am looking
for a way to run virtual Windows machines to do cross-browser testing...
Don't need sound card or anything complex... if I can get it working good
John Almberg jalmb...@identry.com wrote:
Anyone have experience using Sun's Virtual Box on FreeBSD? I am
looking for a way to run virtual Windows machines to do cross-browser
testing...
Don't need sound card or anything complex... if I can get it working
good enough to have access to IE
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:02:59AM -0500, John Almberg wrote:
Anyone have experience using Sun's Virtual Box on FreeBSD? I am
looking for a way to run virtual Windows machines to do cross-browser
testing...
I've been using it to do some .NET programming, and it's been pretty
good. No major
Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:02:59AM -0500, John Almberg wrote:
Anyone have experience using Sun's Virtual Box on FreeBSD? I am
looking for a way to run virtual Windows machines to do cross-browser
testing...
I've been using it to do some .NET programming, and it's been
hi there,
just wanted to ask if there's a way to actually download files via the SVN
ViewVC browser? right now i'm using SVN DAV tree for downloads and SVN
ViewVC browser to track changes, do diffs, etc.
cheers.
alex
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:42:00PM -0400, Chris Hill wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 08:27:34AM -0400, Chris Hill wrote:
Firefox has not had Ctrl-Q for some time. Try Alt-F followed by Q. I guess
that's 2.5 keystrokes, but at least it's keystrokes.
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 08:15:15AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Chad Perrin wrote:
Firefox has not had Ctrl-Q for some time. Try Alt-F followed by Q. I
guess that's 2.5 keystrokes, but at least it's keystrokes.
What version number would you call some time ago? I just used Ctrl-Q
about six
On Fri,08/07/09 [09:32:38], Daniel Underwood wrote:
I'd really love to see chromium ported over.
ditto. But now I'm pretty happy with that new firefox-3.5 which seems pretty
faster than previous version and still light enough for my old 1.6G
celeron-powered laptop.
--
Best regards,
Jeff
|
uber-old
ancient 0.5G AMD powered laptop? :-)
By the way: In order to find out which browser is *really* lightweight,
fast and still easy to use, responsive and standard compliant, you should
try running it on *really* old hardware. If it runs there good enough
so you would use
ditto. But now I'm pretty happy with that new firefox-3.5 which seems pretty
faster than previous version and still light enough for my old 1.6G
celeron-powered laptop.
Nice. I haven't tried 3.5 yet.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 02:55:08AM +0400, Jeff Laine wrote:
On Fri,08/07/09 [09:32:38], Daniel Underwood wrote:
I'd really love to see chromium ported over.
ditto. But now I'm pretty happy with that new firefox-3.5 which seems pretty
faster than previous version and still light enough for
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 08:27:34AM -0400, Chris Hill wrote:
Firefox has not had Ctrl-Q for some time. Try Alt-F followed by Q. I guess
that's 2.5 keystrokes, but at least it's keystrokes.
What version number would you call some time ago? I just used
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 08:27:34AM -0400, Chris Hill wrote:
Firefox has not had Ctrl-Q for some time. Try Alt-F followed by Q. I guess
that's 2.5 keystrokes, but at least it's keystrokes.
What version number would you call some time ago? I just used Ctrl-Q
about six hours or so ago.
--
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:53:22AM +0200, Wolfgang Riegler wrote:
Has anyone tested Arora?
I wouldn't recommend Arora as a lightweight browser to anyone who isn't
already using applications built with the Qt toolkit. If you're a KDE
user, it may be a good choice; if you aren't, it spectacularly
Chad Perrin wrote:
Firefox has not had Ctrl-Q for some time. Try Alt-F followed by Q. I guess
that's 2.5 keystrokes, but at least it's keystrokes.
What version number would you call some time ago? I just used Ctrl-Q
about six hours or so ago.
The FreeBSD machine with Firefox is down but
I'd really love to see chromium ported over.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
I'm using kazehakase with xulrunner. As far as I know,
the only full featured browser to run on ia64.
--
Anton Shterenlikht
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
Bristol University
University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Tel: +44 (0)117 928 8233
Fax
Randall Wood wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:53:22AM +0200, Wolfgang Riegler wrote:
Has anyone tested Arora?
I'm actually surprised no one has recommended Konqueror. It's not my
favorite browser (I happen to love Opera) but it would seem to mostly fit the
bill of fast
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:53:22AM +0200, Wolfgang Riegler wrote:
Has anyone tested Arora?
I'm actually surprised no one has recommended Konqueror. It's not my favorite
browser (I happen to love Opera) but it would seem to mostly fit the bill of
fast, graphical. One trick it does that I
1 - 100 of 351 matches
Mail list logo
