On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:45:16 -0400
Aryeh M. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. Though you might get some strange situations depending on the
guest OS and emulated machine.
cool
For example when emulating a x86_64
running XP pro as the Guest OS I can ping/telnet the host OS but I
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 00:47 -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
Frank Jahnke writes:
VMs in general are a problem on Free. There is an effort to port the
most recent VMware Workstation by a very good man.
VMware employee?
No. He is the fellow who did the VMware 3 port.
Quoting Francisco Reyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Frank Jahnke writes:
VMs in general are a problem on Free. There is an effort to port the
most recent VMware Workstation by a very good man.
VMware employee?
No, Orlando Bassotto, who is the programmer who did much of the work
for the original
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:38:46 -0400
Aryeh M. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Francisco Reyes wrote:
Norberto Meijome writes:
I do not have Windows on any of my machines but I have heard that
Win4BSD is really good. It is not free! I believe it is about
$45.
$45 is far cheaper than
I didnt know all this. thanks! QEMu will have to keep working for now ;)
btw, does QEMU work ok under 64bit?
Yes. Though you might get some strange situations depending on the
guest OS and emulated machine. For example when emulating a x86_64
running XP pro as the Guest OS I can
Francisco Reyes wrote:
Norberto Meijome writes:
I do not have Windows on any of my machines but I have heard that
Win4BSD is really good. It is not free! I believe it is about
$45.
$45 is far cheaper than EMC's VMWare workstation edition. Does it
support Vista
now? interesting..you can
Frank Jahnke writes:
VMs in general are a problem on Free. There is an effort to port the
most recent VMware Workstation by a very good man.
VMware employee?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Norberto Meijome writes:
I do not have Windows on any of my machines but I have heard that
Win4BSD is really good. It is not free! I believe it is about
$45.
$45 is far cheaper than EMC's VMWare workstation edition. Does it support Vista
now? interesting..you can also try QEMu, on which
Ghirai wrote:
I managed to run XP on qemu, it was pretty painless.
I'll try with vista the next couple of days and report back.
What disk image type and what version of FreeBSD do you run (for me
8-current amd64)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
I managed to run XP on qemu, it was pretty painless.
I'll try with vista the next couple of days and report back.
---
Regards,
Ghirai.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 06:02:29PM +, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
I want to run vista (windows) on my freebsd (amd64) machine without
rebooting what is better wine or an vm emulator (if so which one... I
know how to use vmware but never done so on a *nix machine)
Have you tried qemu? You
On Friday 19 October 2007, Frank Jahnke wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 16:47 +0200, Frank Staals wrote:
What is the status of that project if I may ask ? I did some research
on it some time ago but the best I could find was that there was
someone porting vmware-workstation 4.5.X to FreeBSD
On 10/19/07, Frank Jahnke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed. For me it is the biggest problem with using a FreeBSD desktop.
One other sign of hope: there has been intermittent work on a port of
VirtualBox. When I checked last, the GUI environment would build.
That's certainly not a complete
On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 10:23 -0500, Matt wrote:
VirtualBox builds from the Innotek svn sources, and the GUI runs but
with some issues. However, it is possible to boot a full VM instance
from within VirtualBox on a FreeBSD host (which is very promising).
The major missing component (that I'm
Frank Jahnke wrote:
VMs in general are a problem on Free. There is an effort to port the
most recent VMware Workstation by a very good man. I do hope this
works, because right now things in the VM world on FreeBSD truly are
bleak.
Frank
What is the status of that project if I may ask ? I
On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 16:47 +0200, Frank Staals wrote:
What is the status of that project if I may ask ? I did some research on
it some time ago but the best I could find was that there was someone
porting vmware-workstation 4.5.X to FreeBSD allthough there were quite a
lot problems so
Frank Staals wrote:
Frank Jahnke wrote:
VMs in general are a problem on Free. There is an effort to port the
most recent VMware Workstation by a very good man. I do hope this
works, because right now things in the VM world on FreeBSD truly are
bleak.
Frank
What is the status of that
I have heard that Win4BSD is really good.
Your hearing is not good. Win4BSD is a terrible product when compared
with the very old version of VMware. Its only advantage is that you can
run it with more than one CPU (namely, APIC is enabled). Win4BSD is
less stable, less responsive, and it
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:02:29 +
Aryeh M. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to run vista (windows) on my freebsd (amd64) machine without
rebooting what is better wine or...
AFAIK Wine can't run any Windows OS, it runs individual applications.
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
Dear Vista,
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 18:02 +, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
I want to run vista (windows) on my freebsd (amd64) machine without
rebooting what is better wine or an vm emulator (if so which one... I
know how to use vmware but never done so on a *nix
Dear Vista,
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 18:02 +, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
I want to run vista (windows) on my freebsd (amd64) machine without
rebooting what is better wine or an vm emulator (if so which one... I
know how to use vmware but never done so on a *nix machine)
Vista! You have no
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
I want to run vista (windows) on my freebsd (amd64) machine without
rebooting what is better wine or an vm emulator (if so which one... I
know how to use vmware but never done so on a *nix machine)
___
I want to run vista (windows) on my freebsd (amd64) machine without
rebooting what is better wine or an vm emulator (if so which one... I
know how to use vmware but never done so on a *nix machine)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:13:29 -0700
Predrag Punosevac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
I want to run vista (windows) on my freebsd (amd64) machine without
rebooting what is better wine or an vm emulator (if so which one... I
know how to use vmware but never done so on a
Predrag Punosevac wrote:
Frank Jahnke wrote:
I have heard that Win4BSD is really good.
Your hearing is not good. Win4BSD is a terrible product when compared
with the very old version of VMware. Its only advantage is that you can
run it with more than one CPU (namely, APIC is enabled).
25 matches
Mail list logo
