Hi all,
Our fileserver deadlocked, again. It is running RELENG_6 checked out
yesterday. I have enabled DDB, WITNESS and INVARIANTS and have it
hooked up via serial console.
I can not give out shell access, but I can run any command you might
consider useful, here's more details:
The system has
Hi all,
I'm rather new to freebsd so forgive me if I am saying things that don't
make sense.
I have a dual opteron server running freebsd 6.1/amd64 updated 4 weeks ago.
Since I moved to 6 I've been having tho following problem.
When I put heavy load on the server (python scripts that take
Hello,
While talking about custom patches, what's the best way to apply patches
after every cvsup.
In my case I'm using custom patches for bktr and network driver nfe from
HEAD.
As freebsd 6.2 is coming soon and there is work in progress on nfsmb
and I would like to test those new
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
The patch is evil, of that there is no doubt. However a wide cross
section of the user base will want to run a recent version of Flash
whilst 9 is not available.
Can't we work around the dlsym issue in the port with some linker magic?
Could you use objcopy
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 01:54:11AM +0100, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Do we even need the PAGING code in btx any more? It might make the real
mode hackery less confusing to implement.
It's #ifdef'ed out and not compiled in by default, what's the problem
with that?
Cheers,
--
Ruslan Ermilov
We have three Tyan GT20 (2865) NForce4 based machines with a single-
core Opteron and 2 GB of RAM, running stable i386 from two days ago.
(dmesg and kernconf attached.)
Often, but not always, we get the following panic when logging out on
the serial console, or when rebooting the system.
Hello,
I've attached two files. camdebug.log is a standard boot and
camdebug_verbose.log is verbose boot. Both logs were captured via the
serial console, so there might be control chars in them.
Please let me know what else might be helpful.
Cheers
Benjamin
pgpuuVjho1BaU.pgp
Description:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:10:41 +0100
Dominic Marks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:14:47 +0100
Dominic Marks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Received this one this morning. I was in Gnome, just opened
sylpheed. Had a collection of other apps running, no particular
how does one put in proper POC info for this? ...
hop on over to [EMAIL PROTECTED] most of the
mirror/infrastructure stuff seems to go there. there's
a mailman archive of it. a note would probably do.
... didn't already fix.
there's a pr/thread there that contains most of what
you'd want to
On Friday 27 October 2006 17:09, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
As freebsd 6.2 is coming soon and there is work in progress on nfsmb
and I would like to test those new features/drivers I cvsup very often
and sometimes I forget to apply my custom patches :)
The good thing is that all my patches are in
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Dominic Marks wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:10:41 +0100
Dominic Marks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:14:47 +0100
Dominic Marks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Received this one this morning. I was in Gnome, just opened sylpheed. Had
a collection of other apps
And again, this time with latest STABLE. Help! (please) Ideas for a
work-around would be appreciated as well. As before crash info is available
to developers (93MB).
If you have a serial console set up, could you compile DDB, INVARIANTS, and
WITNESS into the kernel? When the panic
In response to bram [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I'm rather new to freebsd so forgive me if I am saying things that don't
make sense.
I have a dual opteron server running freebsd 6.1/amd64 updated 4 weeks ago.
Since I moved to 6 I've been having tho following problem.
When I put
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 10:34:25PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Please let Scott and I know whether or not this patch works for you
(in addition to the information previously requested, if you have not
already sent it). Unfortunately it is only a workaround, but it
points to an underlying
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim C. Nasby
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 12:44 AM
To: David Magda
Cc: Mike Jakubik; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Running large DB's on FreeBSD
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 08:15:04PM
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 01:26:11 -0400
srwadleigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thinkpad T41
6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #20: Thu Oct 26 05:15:07 EDT
Two usb attached WD myBook 500gb external drives. The first drive is
setup as a gmirror provider, and mounts/functions fine, when I attempt
Free Shipping on Everything in the store.
(Expires December 14)
*Lesson Plans correlated to your state social studies curriculum standards
*Thousands of award-winning documentaries Biography programs organized by
Hi!
Can someone report success with the onboard GigE ports of an
Intel S5000PAL board ?
Thanks for any report 8-}
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 171 310137214 years to
go !
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 09:35:09AM +0200, bram wrote:
Hi all,
I'm rather new to freebsd so forgive me if I am saying things that don't
make sense.
I have a dual opteron server running freebsd 6.1/amd64 updated 4 weeks ago.
Since I moved to 6 I've been having tho following problem.
On 10/27/06, Kurt Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Can someone report success with the onboard GigE ports of an
Intel S5000PAL board ?
Thanks for any report 8-}
This is one of our new systems, the onboard NICs require either
the latest driver you can download from Intel, or the community
Hi,
At 17:05 27/10/2006, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
Can someone report success with the onboard GigE ports of an
Intel S5000PAL board ? [etc]
The standard ports Just Work with the em driver on a recent RELENG_6.
IPMI access to the BMC via the piggybacked MAC addresses also works.
We haven't
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 10:06:30AM -0400, Bucky Jordan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim C. Nasby
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 12:44 AM
To: David Magda
Cc: Mike Jakubik; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Hi folks. I have read of some issues with the Dell PE1950/2950s in the
archive, but nothing like this. I have a Dell PowerEdge 1950 with 2
dual-core Xeon 5050 processors, with SATA drives attached to the Dell
SAS5/i controller.
I'm trying to load 6.1-STABLE-200609 AMD64 on the machine. It
Hi,
has anyone experience with the Tyan Toledo i3000R (S5191)[1] Mainboard
or the Intel i3000 Chipset and FreeBSD-6?
[1] http://www.tyan.com/products/html/toledoi3000r.html
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
At 12:33 PM 10/27/2006, Jack Vogel wrote:
On 10/27/06, Kurt Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Can someone report success with the onboard GigE ports of an
Intel S5000PAL board ?
Thanks for any report 8-}
This is one of our new systems, the onboard NICs require either
the latest driver you
Sorry, but you dont want to do this. This is a hybrid
sorta NIC, the PHY is only 10/100, but the MAC is
a Gig part.
Get the latest em driver and load that, guess what, it
will work.
Dont look at me, wasnt my idea :)
Jack
On 10/27/06, Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:33 PM
At 05:28 PM 10/27/2006, Jack Vogel wrote:
Sorry, but you dont want to do this. This is a hybrid
sorta NIC, the PHY is only 10/100, but the MAC is
a Gig part.
Get the latest em driver and load that, guess what, it
will work.
Hi,
I thought the latest em driver is in RELENG_6 ? With the
On 10/27/06, Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 05:28 PM 10/27/2006, Jack Vogel wrote:
Sorry, but you dont want to do this. This is a hybrid
sorta NIC, the PHY is only 10/100, but the MAC is
a Gig part.
Get the latest em driver and load that, guess what, it
will work.
Hi,
I
At 05:52 PM 10/27/2006, Jack Vogel wrote:
HMMM, ok, maybe I jumped the gun, if this thing says ICH7 then its not
the NIC I was talking about, thats ICH8. I just didnt think there were any
10/100 parts that werent already in the fxp driver.
I looked at the PCI ID, and its not what I was talking
On 10/27/06, Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 05:52 PM 10/27/2006, Jack Vogel wrote:
HMMM, ok, maybe I jumped the gun, if this thing says ICH7 then its not
the NIC I was talking about, thats ICH8. I just didnt think there were any
10/100 parts that werent already in the fxp driver.
I
Philipp Wuensche wrote:
has anyone experience with the Tyan Toledo i3000R (S5191)[1] Mainboard
or the Intel i3000 Chipset and FreeBSD-6?
[1] http://www.tyan.com/products/html/toledoi3000r.html
I believe this was the MB in the GT20 we tested the other
day. In the brief test install and network
At 06:49 PM 10/27/2006, Jack Vogel wrote:
Any chance to commit the ID info to the driver ? Seems to work just
fine as an fxp.
---Mike
When the current firefight I'm in is over I'll check it out.
Super, thanks!
---Mike
___
After a conference call today, it was decided that a merge of
my Intel driver base and the STABLE code would take place.
This code undoes the INTR_FAST/taskqueue approach for right
now. Work will continue to get that to work, but the hope is that
this driver will be more stable for the 6.2
On Saturday 21 October 2006 13:33, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
= We aren't currently speaking about performance, we need to know whether
= kernel with DEVICE_POLLING option makes NIC work stable.
Having noticed today's em-driver update, I rebuilt world/kernel and tried the
dump-test again.
The kernel
34 matches
Mail list logo
