FreeBSD 7.0 WITHOUT Heimdal

2008-04-10 Thread Gunnar Flygt
In earlier version of FreeBSD I've been able to NOT include the heimdal delivered with the system, by providing the flag NO_KERBEROS=yes in /etc/make.conf In 7.0 there is no detection of such a flag. How should I continue to NOT build the 0.6.3 heimdal that is deliverd with 7.0? I want to use the

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 WITHOUT Heimdal

2008-04-10 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2008-04-10 13:24, Gunnar Flygt wrote: In earlier version of FreeBSD I've been able to NOT include the heimdal delivered with the system, by providing the flag NO_KERBEROS=yes in /etc/make.conf In 7.0 there is no detection of such a flag. All the NO_XXX flags have been obsoleted, use

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 WITHOUT Heimdal

2008-04-10 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2008-04-10 13:56, Dimitry Andric wrote: All the NO_XXX flags have been obsoleted, use WITHOUT_KERBEROS=yes instead. See src.conf(5) for more information. Btw, you also need to put these directives in /etc/src.conf, not /etc/make.conf. See /usr/src/UPDATING, under 20060317.

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 WITHOUT Heimdal

2008-04-10 Thread Gunnar Flygt
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 01:56:12PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2008-04-10 13:24, Gunnar Flygt wrote: In earlier version of FreeBSD I've been able to NOT include the heimdal delivered with the system, by providing the flag NO_KERBEROS=yes in /etc/make.conf In 7.0 there is no

Re: Digitally Signed Binaries w/ Kernel support, etc.

2008-04-10 Thread Peter Wemm
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 10:58:40AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: Signing binaries could be naturally tied in with securelevel, where some securelevel (1?) would mean kernel no longer accepts new keys. If you set the

Re: Digitally Signed Binaries w/ Kernel support, etc.

2008-04-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
Peter Wemm wrote: On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 10:58:40AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: Signing binaries could be naturally tied in with securelevel, where some securelevel (1?) would mean kernel no longer accepts new keys.

Re: Digitally Signed Binaries w/ Kernel support, etc.

2008-04-10 Thread Christian S.J. Peron
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 04:39:56PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote: [..] csjp@ had a mac_chkexec module that looks like it was never committed. http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.freebsd.hackers/msg/074eec7def84c52b Shouldn't be hard to update it. Just a few notes: - This isn't really

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 WITHOUT Heimdal

2008-04-10 Thread J. Porter Clark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dimitry Andric) writes: On 2008-04-10 13:24, Gunnar Flygt wrote: In earlier version of FreeBSD I've been able to NOT include the heimdal delivered with the system, by providing the flag NO_KERBEROS=yes in /etc/make.conf In 7.0 there is no detection of such a flag. All

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 WITHOUT Heimdal

2008-04-10 Thread Marcin Cieslak
J. Porter Clark wrote: gnome-vfs won't compile with WITHOUT_KERBEROS=yes for some reason or other. Ugh. Another reason to have permanent WITHOUT_GNOMEVFS=yes in /etc/make.conf ;-) --Marcin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [SO]HO Software RAID5 server: which implementation should I choice?

2008-04-10 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:45 AM, Lev Serebryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, freebsd-stable. Does somebody use some software RAID5 on FreeBSD in real production system? I want to build storage server for my home: RAW photos, multi-layer PhotoShop files and FLAC-encoded music consume

Re: Recent bootloaders not working also on FIC PA-2005 board

2008-04-10 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 04:32:48 pm Marcin Cieslak wrote: It would be these changes. Debugging this will be hard. :( Are you familiar with x86 assembly at all? I have a bit different problem: The box (old Pentium-MMX PC with the FIC PA-2005 board using VT82C580 (Apollo VP)

Re: LOR sleepq/scrlock

2008-04-10 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday 08 April 2008 07:46:41 pm Aristedes Maniatis wrote: On 08/04/2008, at 11:59 PM, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday 08 April 2008 04:06:24 am Aristedes Maniatis wrote: FreeBSD dash.ish.com.au 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #10 i386 with PAE (5Gb RAM) We've had fairly

HEADS UP: procstat(1) MFC to RELENG_7 in progress

2008-04-10 Thread Robert Watson
FYI: I've begun the MFC of procstat(1) from HEAD to RELENG_7. This requires merging a number of kernel changes, and then the command line tool, so it will occur over the next day or so. I'll send out a further e-mail when the merge is done. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University

RELENG_6_3 ping and DUP packets

2008-04-10 Thread Damian Weber
Hello list, after upgrading from RELENG_6_2 to RELENG_6_3, I'm seeing duplicate packets when pinging the upgraded machine. I'm somewhat stuck, didn't find anything useful on the Web, so I'm asking the list, what I should try next. BTW, everything else works fine (ssh, NFS mount, NIS,). - -

Disk I/O Question 7.0-STABLE

2008-04-10 Thread Karl Denninger
FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #9: Sat Mar 29 08:31:56 CST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KSD-SMP Running generally well. I have disks on the internal ICH7 adapters (on the motherboard), SATA, and also a TWE controller with two disks. When hitting the TWE controller hard I can hose the

Re: LOR sleepq/scrlock

2008-04-10 Thread Aristedes Maniatis
http://www.ish.com.au/s/LOR/1.jpg http://www.ish.com.au/s/LOR/2.jpg http://www.ish.com.au/s/LOR/3.jpg (this overlaps with [2]) These are all garbage in kuickshow. :( They work fine for me in Firefox. But don't know what sort of jpegs the Sony camera saves. Anyhow I've also now resaved

Re: HEADS UP: procstat(1) MFC to RELENG_7 in progress

2008-04-10 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:49:55PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: FYI: I've begun the MFC of procstat(1) from HEAD to RELENG_7. This requires merging a number of kernel changes, and then the command line tool, so it will occur over the next day or so. I'll send out a further e-mail when the

Re: RELENG_6_3 ping and DUP packets

2008-04-10 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Apr 10, 2008, at 1:58 PM, Damian Weber wrote: But here is the problem, pinging the machine from remote gives A.B.C.X$ ping A.B.C.D PING A.B.C.D (A.B.C.D): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from A.B.C.D: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.272 ms 64 bytes from A.B.C.D: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.391 ms (DUP!)

Re: USB keyboard locking up on 7-RELEASE/amd64

2008-04-10 Thread Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 17:07 -0500, H. Wade Minter wrote: I have a Dell Optiplex 755, with an Intel Core 2 Duo chip. I have installed 7-RELEASE/amd64 on it. 2GB of RAM, 6GB of swap. The install went fine, but post-install I'm running into a problem where the USB keyboard will just lock

Re: RELENG_6_3 ping and DUP packets

2008-04-10 Thread Mike Andrews
Chuck Swiger wrote: On Apr 10, 2008, at 1:58 PM, Damian Weber wrote: But here is the problem, pinging the machine from remote gives A.B.C.X$ ping A.B.C.D PING A.B.C.D (A.B.C.D): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from A.B.C.D: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.272 ms 64 bytes from A.B.C.D: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255

sched_ule performance on single CPU

2008-04-10 Thread Unga
Hi all I have noted early April that RELENG_7 is upgraded to sched_ule by default and gave it a try with sched_ule until today. My desktop is a 3GHz single Intel Pentium 4 processor with 512MB RAM. I have noted by desktop response wise sched_4bsd is better, ie. the desktop is more responsive. It